9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
5.2 KiB
5.2 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-purpose | Purpose | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.85 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Purpose
매 한 줄
"매 know your why before you optimize your how.". 매 Aristotle 의 telos 부터 매 Sinek 의 Start with Why, 매 Frankl 의 meaning therapy 까지 — 매 purpose = 매 why an entity (person, system, product) exists. 매 2026 software/AI 에서 매 purpose 명시는 매 alignment, scope creep 회피, 매 LLM agent goal-setting 의 foundation.
매 핵심
매 4 levels of purpose
- Existential (인간): 매 Frankl — 매 meaning vs pleasure vs power.
- Organizational: 매 mission statement — 매 "why does this company exist?".
- Product: 매 user job-to-be-done (Christensen) — 매 "what hire is this product made for?".
- System/Code: 매 module purpose — 매 "what 1 thing does this module own?".
매 purpose articulation patterns
- Sinek's Golden Circle: WHY → HOW → WHAT.
- JTBD: "When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]".
- OKR: Objective (qualitative why) + Key Results (measurable).
- Module docstring: 1-line purpose + invariants.
매 응용
- Code: 매 module 의 1-sentence purpose 가 unclear 면 — split or rename.
- LLM agent: 매 system prompt 의 첫 줄은 purpose — 매 alignment anchor.
- Career: 매 ikigai (것 + 잘 + need + paid).
- Product: 매 JTBD interview → feature prioritization.
💻 패턴
Pattern 1: Module-level purpose docstring
"""
auth/jwt.py
PURPOSE: 매 issue and verify JWT tokens for our API authentication.
INVARIANTS:
- Tokens always include `iss` claim.
- Verification rejects tokens with `alg=none`.
NON-GOALS:
- Session storage (see auth/session.py).
- Refresh-token rotation (see auth/refresh.py).
"""
Pattern 2: LLM agent system prompt
SYSTEM = """You are a code-review assistant.
PURPOSE: 매 surface non-obvious bugs, security issues, and style violations
in the user's pull request, prioritized by severity.
NON-GOALS:
- Generating new code (the user does that).
- Auto-fixing without confirmation.
CONSTRAINTS:
- Always cite file:line for every claim.
- Refuse to comment on out-of-scope files.
"""
Pattern 3: JTBD interview template
job_to_be_done:
situation: "When I'm onboarding a new team member"
motivation: "I want a single doc with their day-1 setup"
outcome: "so they can ship a real PR by end of week 1"
current_alternatives: [README, Notion page, ad-hoc Slack DMs]
hire_criteria: [single-source, executable, verified]
Pattern 4: OKR framing
objective: "매 Make AI Act compliance trivial for EU SMBs"
key_results:
- "Onboard 100 SMBs by Q3"
- "Reduce time-to-compliance from 30d → 5d"
- "NPS ≥ 50"
Pattern 5: Purpose-test for scope creep
def is_in_scope(feature, module_purpose) -> bool:
"""매 ask: 'does this feature serve the module's stated purpose?'"""
# 매 if no, push to a different module or reject
return feature.advances(module_purpose)
Pattern 6: 5-Whys to surface purpose
Q: Why are we building this dashboard?
A: To show metrics.
Q: Why?
A: So managers can see team health.
Q: Why?
A: So they can intervene early.
Q: Why?
A: To prevent burnout & attrition.
Q: Why?
A: Because attrition costs $200K/engineer.
→ 매 PURPOSE: "매 reduce attrition cost via early-burnout intervention".
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Tool |
|---|---|
| 매 module/file design | 1-sentence purpose docstring |
| 매 LLM agent design | Purpose + non-goals + constraints in system prompt |
| 매 product feature triage | JTBD + Purpose-test |
| 매 organization strategy | Mission statement + OKRs |
| 매 personal direction | Ikigai / 5-Whys |
기본값: 매 1-sentence purpose 가 없으면 — 매 don't ship.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Philosophy · Design Thinking
- 변형: Mission · Vision · Telos · Ikigai
- 응용: OKR
- Adjacent: Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 system prompt 첫 줄, 매 module docstring, 매 product brief, 매 strategy doc. 언제 X: 매 throwaway prototypes — 매 over-formalization slows iteration.
❌ 안티패턴
- No purpose: 매 module 이 "everything" 하면 — 매 god class.
- Purpose drift: 매 purpose 명시했지만 features 가 매 drift — 매 update or refactor.
- Aspirational nonsense: 매 "make the world better" — 매 unactionable.
- Purpose ≠ method: 매 "use React" 는 method, not purpose.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics; Frankl Man's Search for Meaning; Sinek Start with Why; Christensen JTBD).
- 신뢰도 A (foundational philosophical + management canon).
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — 4 levels, JTBD/OKR/Golden Circle 패턴 |