Files
2nd/10_Wiki/Topics/AI_and_ML/CPTED.md
T
koriweb d8a80f6272 chore(wiki): dangling 링크 canonical 정규화 (768파일/1200건)
이름만 다른(표기 변형) [[위키링크]]를 대상 문서의 canonical 제목으로 치환해
끊겼던 1,200개 링크를 연결. 제목/파일명 정규화 일치만 적용하고 별칭 매칭은
과병합 위험으로 제외(애매성 가드). 원본은 _link_reconcile_backup/ 에 백업.
도구: Datacollect/scripts/link_reconcile_apply.mjs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-08 12:24:15 +09:00

244 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown

---
id: wiki-2026-0508-cpted
title: CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [CPTED, environmental design, defensible space, broken windows, urban safety, Oscar Newman]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.88
verification_status: applied
tags: [urban-planning, security, cpted, defensible-space, broken-windows, smart-city, environmental-design]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: urban planning / security
applicable_to: [Urban Design, Smart City, Security Architecture]
---
# CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
## 📌 한 줄 통찰
> **"매 공간 으로 범죄 의 prevention"**. 매 CCTV 의 reactive X — 매 building / lighting / fence 의 design 의 의지 의 deter. 매 5 strategy. 매 modern: 매 smart city + AI 의 simulation 의 augment.
## 📖 핵심
### 매 5 strategy (2nd-gen CPTED)
1. **Natural Surveillance**: 매 visibility (low fence, transparent wall, lighting).
2. **Natural Access Control**: 매 single entry, 매 clear pathway.
3. **Territorial Reinforcement**: 매 public-private boundary 의 clear.
4. **Activity Support**: 매 people 의 traffic.
5. **Maintenance** (Image): 매 broken window 의 fix.
### 매 historical
- **Jane Jacobs** (1961): "The Death and Life of Great American Cities" — 매 "eyes on the street".
- **Oscar Newman** (1972): "Defensible Space".
- **C. Ray Jeffery** (1971): 매 CPTED term.
- **Wilson & Kelling** (1982): 매 broken windows theory.
### 매 1st vs 2nd vs 3rd generation
| 세대 | 강조 |
|---|---|
| 1st | 매 physical (Jeffery, Newman) |
| 2nd | 매 social cohesion (community) |
| 3rd | 매 sustainability + tech |
### 매 application 예
- **Park**: 매 sightline + lighting + 매 wide path.
- **Apartment**: 매 lobby visibility + 매 single entry + 매 maintained.
- **Parking lot**: 매 lighting + 매 emergency phone + 매 cctv.
- **School**: 매 layered security + 매 visibility + 매 community.
- **ATM**: 매 lighting + 매 visibility + 매 mirror.
- **Transit station**: 매 sightline + 매 staff presence.
### 매 modern (smart city)
- **AI surveillance**: 매 abnormal pattern detection.
- **Adaptive lighting**: 매 motion-triggered.
- **Crowd flow analytics**: 매 design feedback.
- **Predictive crime mapping**: 매 high-risk area focus.
- **Citizen reporting app**: 매 311 / SeeClickFix.
### 매 limitation / critique
- **Displacement**: 매 crime 의 다른 area 의 move.
- **Surveillance**: 매 privacy concern.
- **Equity**: 매 wealthy area 의 over-invest.
- **False sense**: 매 design 의 omnipotent X.
- **Broken windows critique**: 매 racial bias.
### 매 Korea CPTED
- 매 2014 의 시범 도시.
- 매 경찰청 의 cooperation.
- 매 Salt Path / 안심 귀가 길.
- 매 mural / lighting / mirror.
### 매 design checklist
1. 매 sightline 의 unobstructed?
2. 매 lighting 의 0.5+ lux 의 every spot?
3. 매 access route 의 single + clear?
4. 매 dead-end / hidden alcove?
5. 매 maintenance 의 < 24h response?
6. 매 territoriality (sign, paint, fence)?
7. 매 activity (cafe, store) 의 generator?
## 💻 패턴 (응용 — design checklist + sim)
### CPTED audit checklist (programmatic)
```python
def cpted_audit(location):
return {
'natural_surveillance': {
'sightline_coverage': measure_sightlines(location), # 매 % visible
'avg_lux_at_night': measure_lighting(location),
'window_facing_ratio': building_facade_ratio(location),
},
'access_control': {
'entry_count': count_entries(location),
'pathway_clarity': measure_path_clarity(location),
},
'territoriality': {
'boundary_markers': count_boundary_signs(location),
'private_public_clarity': assess_boundary(location),
},
'activity': {
'foot_traffic_per_hour': pedestrian_count(location),
'commercial_density': commerce_per_sqm(location),
},
'maintenance': {
'graffiti_density': count_graffiti(location),
'broken_lighting_pct': pct_broken_lights(location),
'litter_score': litter_density(location),
},
}
```
### Crime risk simulation
```python
def predict_crime_risk(area, design_params):
"""매 simple model 의 risk score."""
risk = 0
risk -= design_params['lux_avg'] * 0.3
risk -= design_params['sightline_pct'] * 0.5
risk += design_params['hidden_alcoves'] * 2
risk -= design_params['foot_traffic_per_hr'] * 0.01
risk += design_params['litter_score'] * 0.5
return max(0, risk)
# 매 design alternative 의 비교
baseline = predict_crime_risk(area, current_design)
improved = predict_crime_risk(area, {**current_design, 'lux_avg': 5, 'hidden_alcoves': 0})
print(f'Risk reduction: {baseline - improved:.1f}')
```
### Adaptive lighting (smart city)
```python
class AdaptiveStreetlight:
def __init__(self, motion_sensor, schedule):
self.sensor = motion_sensor
self.schedule = schedule
def update(self):
time = datetime.now().time()
# 매 base level
base_level = self.schedule.level_for(time)
# 매 motion 시 의 brighten
if self.sensor.motion_detected_recently(seconds=30):
self.set_brightness(min(100, base_level + 50))
else:
self.set_brightness(base_level)
```
### 311 / citizen report integration
```python
def cpted_response_pipeline(report):
"""매 citizen report → 매 prioritize."""
if report.type == 'broken_streetlight':
priority = 'high' if report.area.crime_rate > MEDIAN else 'medium'
target_response = 24 if priority == 'high' else 72 # hours
elif report.type == 'graffiti':
priority = 'medium'
target_response = 48
elif report.type == 'overgrown_bush':
priority = 'medium' # 매 sightline 의 obstruct
target_response = 72
return dispatch(report, priority, target_response)
```
### Design alternative scorer
```python
def score_design_options(options):
scored = []
for opt in options:
score = (
opt.surveillance_score * 0.3 +
opt.access_control_score * 0.2 +
opt.territoriality_score * 0.2 +
opt.activity_score * 0.2 +
opt.maintenance_score * 0.1
)
cost = opt.estimated_cost
scored.append((opt, score, score / cost)) # 매 cost-effectiveness
return sorted(scored, key=lambda x: -x[2])
```
### Predictive crime mapping (caution)
```python
# 매 ProPublica / Gender Shades 의 lesson:
# 매 historical crime data 의 bias.
# 매 over-policing 의 reinforce.
def predict_with_bias_check(features, model, bias_audit):
pred = model.predict(features)
# 매 demographic 의 audit
by_demo = bias_audit.check(pred)
if by_demo['disparity'] > 0.2:
flag('Disparate impact detected — review required')
return pred
```
## 🤔 결정 기준
| 상황 | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Park redesign | Sightline + lighting + activity |
| Apartment | Single entry + lobby visibility |
| Parking | Lighting + emergency call + visibility |
| Transit | Sightline + staff + cctv |
| Smart city | Adaptive lighting + crowd analytics |
| Tight budget | Lighting + maintenance |
**기본값**: 매 surveillance + lighting + maintenance + activity 의 first investment.
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Security]]
- 변형: [[Defensible-Space]] · [[Broken-Windows]]
- 사상가: [[Oscar-Newman]]
- Adjacent: [[Atmospheric-Intelligence]] · [[Algorithmic Fairness]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 urban planning. 매 building design. 매 smart city. 매 community safety initiative.
**언제 X**: 매 systemic root cause (poverty 의 substitute). 매 surveillance state justification.
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Surveillance 의 only**: 매 design 의 ignore.
- **Fortress design**: 매 community 의 disconnect.
- **No maintenance**: 매 broken windows.
- **No activity**: 매 dead street.
- **Bias 의 ignore** (predictive crime): 매 over-policing.
- **Rich neighborhoods 만 의 invest**: 매 inequity.
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Jacobs 1961, Newman 1972, Wilson-Kelling 1982).
- 신뢰도 A.
- Related: [[Smart-City]] · [[Atmospheric-Intelligence]] · [[Surveillance-Capitalism]] · [[Algorithmic Fairness]].
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — 5 strategy + history + smart-city + 매 audit / sim / adaptive code |