d8a80f6272
이름만 다른(표기 변형) [[위키링크]]를 대상 문서의 canonical 제목으로 치환해 끊겼던 1,200개 링크를 연결. 제목/파일명 정규화 일치만 적용하고 별칭 매칭은 과병합 위험으로 제외(애매성 가드). 원본은 _link_reconcile_backup/ 에 백업. 도구: Datacollect/scripts/link_reconcile_apply.mjs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
244 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown
244 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-cpted
|
|
title: CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [CPTED, environmental design, defensible space, broken windows, urban safety, Oscar Newman]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.88
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [urban-planning, security, cpted, defensible-space, broken-windows, smart-city, environmental-design]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: urban planning / security
|
|
applicable_to: [Urban Design, Smart City, Security Architecture]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
|
|
|
|
## 📌 한 줄 통찰
|
|
> **"매 공간 으로 범죄 의 prevention"**. 매 CCTV 의 reactive X — 매 building / lighting / fence 의 design 의 의지 의 deter. 매 5 strategy. 매 modern: 매 smart city + AI 의 simulation 의 augment.
|
|
|
|
## 📖 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 5 strategy (2nd-gen CPTED)
|
|
1. **Natural Surveillance**: 매 visibility (low fence, transparent wall, lighting).
|
|
2. **Natural Access Control**: 매 single entry, 매 clear pathway.
|
|
3. **Territorial Reinforcement**: 매 public-private boundary 의 clear.
|
|
4. **Activity Support**: 매 people 의 traffic.
|
|
5. **Maintenance** (Image): 매 broken window 의 fix.
|
|
|
|
### 매 historical
|
|
- **Jane Jacobs** (1961): "The Death and Life of Great American Cities" — 매 "eyes on the street".
|
|
- **Oscar Newman** (1972): "Defensible Space".
|
|
- **C. Ray Jeffery** (1971): 매 CPTED term.
|
|
- **Wilson & Kelling** (1982): 매 broken windows theory.
|
|
|
|
### 매 1st vs 2nd vs 3rd generation
|
|
| 세대 | 강조 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 1st | 매 physical (Jeffery, Newman) |
|
|
| 2nd | 매 social cohesion (community) |
|
|
| 3rd | 매 sustainability + tech |
|
|
|
|
### 매 application 예
|
|
- **Park**: 매 sightline + lighting + 매 wide path.
|
|
- **Apartment**: 매 lobby visibility + 매 single entry + 매 maintained.
|
|
- **Parking lot**: 매 lighting + 매 emergency phone + 매 cctv.
|
|
- **School**: 매 layered security + 매 visibility + 매 community.
|
|
- **ATM**: 매 lighting + 매 visibility + 매 mirror.
|
|
- **Transit station**: 매 sightline + 매 staff presence.
|
|
|
|
### 매 modern (smart city)
|
|
- **AI surveillance**: 매 abnormal pattern detection.
|
|
- **Adaptive lighting**: 매 motion-triggered.
|
|
- **Crowd flow analytics**: 매 design feedback.
|
|
- **Predictive crime mapping**: 매 high-risk area focus.
|
|
- **Citizen reporting app**: 매 311 / SeeClickFix.
|
|
|
|
### 매 limitation / critique
|
|
- **Displacement**: 매 crime 의 다른 area 의 move.
|
|
- **Surveillance**: 매 privacy concern.
|
|
- **Equity**: 매 wealthy area 의 over-invest.
|
|
- **False sense**: 매 design 의 omnipotent X.
|
|
- **Broken windows critique**: 매 racial bias.
|
|
|
|
### 매 Korea CPTED
|
|
- 매 2014 의 시범 도시.
|
|
- 매 경찰청 의 cooperation.
|
|
- 매 Salt Path / 안심 귀가 길.
|
|
- 매 mural / lighting / mirror.
|
|
|
|
### 매 design checklist
|
|
1. 매 sightline 의 unobstructed?
|
|
2. 매 lighting 의 0.5+ lux 의 every spot?
|
|
3. 매 access route 의 single + clear?
|
|
4. 매 dead-end / hidden alcove?
|
|
5. 매 maintenance 의 < 24h response?
|
|
6. 매 territoriality (sign, paint, fence)?
|
|
7. 매 activity (cafe, store) 의 generator?
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴 (응용 — design checklist + sim)
|
|
|
|
### CPTED audit checklist (programmatic)
|
|
```python
|
|
def cpted_audit(location):
|
|
return {
|
|
'natural_surveillance': {
|
|
'sightline_coverage': measure_sightlines(location), # 매 % visible
|
|
'avg_lux_at_night': measure_lighting(location),
|
|
'window_facing_ratio': building_facade_ratio(location),
|
|
},
|
|
'access_control': {
|
|
'entry_count': count_entries(location),
|
|
'pathway_clarity': measure_path_clarity(location),
|
|
},
|
|
'territoriality': {
|
|
'boundary_markers': count_boundary_signs(location),
|
|
'private_public_clarity': assess_boundary(location),
|
|
},
|
|
'activity': {
|
|
'foot_traffic_per_hour': pedestrian_count(location),
|
|
'commercial_density': commerce_per_sqm(location),
|
|
},
|
|
'maintenance': {
|
|
'graffiti_density': count_graffiti(location),
|
|
'broken_lighting_pct': pct_broken_lights(location),
|
|
'litter_score': litter_density(location),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Crime risk simulation
|
|
```python
|
|
def predict_crime_risk(area, design_params):
|
|
"""매 simple model 의 risk score."""
|
|
risk = 0
|
|
risk -= design_params['lux_avg'] * 0.3
|
|
risk -= design_params['sightline_pct'] * 0.5
|
|
risk += design_params['hidden_alcoves'] * 2
|
|
risk -= design_params['foot_traffic_per_hr'] * 0.01
|
|
risk += design_params['litter_score'] * 0.5
|
|
return max(0, risk)
|
|
|
|
# 매 design alternative 의 비교
|
|
baseline = predict_crime_risk(area, current_design)
|
|
improved = predict_crime_risk(area, {**current_design, 'lux_avg': 5, 'hidden_alcoves': 0})
|
|
print(f'Risk reduction: {baseline - improved:.1f}')
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Adaptive lighting (smart city)
|
|
```python
|
|
class AdaptiveStreetlight:
|
|
def __init__(self, motion_sensor, schedule):
|
|
self.sensor = motion_sensor
|
|
self.schedule = schedule
|
|
|
|
def update(self):
|
|
time = datetime.now().time()
|
|
# 매 base level
|
|
base_level = self.schedule.level_for(time)
|
|
|
|
# 매 motion 시 의 brighten
|
|
if self.sensor.motion_detected_recently(seconds=30):
|
|
self.set_brightness(min(100, base_level + 50))
|
|
else:
|
|
self.set_brightness(base_level)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 311 / citizen report integration
|
|
```python
|
|
def cpted_response_pipeline(report):
|
|
"""매 citizen report → 매 prioritize."""
|
|
if report.type == 'broken_streetlight':
|
|
priority = 'high' if report.area.crime_rate > MEDIAN else 'medium'
|
|
target_response = 24 if priority == 'high' else 72 # hours
|
|
elif report.type == 'graffiti':
|
|
priority = 'medium'
|
|
target_response = 48
|
|
elif report.type == 'overgrown_bush':
|
|
priority = 'medium' # 매 sightline 의 obstruct
|
|
target_response = 72
|
|
|
|
return dispatch(report, priority, target_response)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Design alternative scorer
|
|
```python
|
|
def score_design_options(options):
|
|
scored = []
|
|
for opt in options:
|
|
score = (
|
|
opt.surveillance_score * 0.3 +
|
|
opt.access_control_score * 0.2 +
|
|
opt.territoriality_score * 0.2 +
|
|
opt.activity_score * 0.2 +
|
|
opt.maintenance_score * 0.1
|
|
)
|
|
cost = opt.estimated_cost
|
|
scored.append((opt, score, score / cost)) # 매 cost-effectiveness
|
|
return sorted(scored, key=lambda x: -x[2])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Predictive crime mapping (caution)
|
|
```python
|
|
# 매 ProPublica / Gender Shades 의 lesson:
|
|
# 매 historical crime data 의 bias.
|
|
# 매 over-policing 의 reinforce.
|
|
|
|
def predict_with_bias_check(features, model, bias_audit):
|
|
pred = model.predict(features)
|
|
|
|
# 매 demographic 의 audit
|
|
by_demo = bias_audit.check(pred)
|
|
if by_demo['disparity'] > 0.2:
|
|
flag('Disparate impact detected — review required')
|
|
|
|
return pred
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 🤔 결정 기준
|
|
| 상황 | Strategy |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Park redesign | Sightline + lighting + activity |
|
|
| Apartment | Single entry + lobby visibility |
|
|
| Parking | Lighting + emergency call + visibility |
|
|
| Transit | Sightline + staff + cctv |
|
|
| Smart city | Adaptive lighting + crowd analytics |
|
|
| Tight budget | Lighting + maintenance |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: 매 surveillance + lighting + maintenance + activity 의 first investment.
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 부모: [[Security]]
|
|
- 변형: [[Defensible-Space]] · [[Broken-Windows]]
|
|
- 사상가: [[Oscar-Newman]]
|
|
- Adjacent: [[Atmospheric-Intelligence]] · [[Algorithmic Fairness]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: 매 urban planning. 매 building design. 매 smart city. 매 community safety initiative.
|
|
**언제 X**: 매 systemic root cause (poverty 의 substitute). 매 surveillance state justification.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Surveillance 의 only**: 매 design 의 ignore.
|
|
- **Fortress design**: 매 community 의 disconnect.
|
|
- **No maintenance**: 매 broken windows.
|
|
- **No activity**: 매 dead street.
|
|
- **Bias 의 ignore** (predictive crime): 매 over-policing.
|
|
- **Rich neighborhoods 만 의 invest**: 매 inequity.
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Jacobs 1961, Newman 1972, Wilson-Kelling 1982).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
- Related: [[Smart-City]] · [[Atmospheric-Intelligence]] · [[Surveillance-Capitalism]] · [[Algorithmic Fairness]].
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — 5 strategy + history + smart-city + 매 audit / sim / adaptive code |
|