d8a80f6272
이름만 다른(표기 변형) [[위키링크]]를 대상 문서의 canonical 제목으로 치환해 끊겼던 1,200개 링크를 연결. 제목/파일명 정규화 일치만 적용하고 별칭 매칭은 과병합 위험으로 제외(애매성 가드). 원본은 _link_reconcile_backup/ 에 백업. 도구: Datacollect/scripts/link_reconcile_apply.mjs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
225 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
225 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: wiki-2026-0508-beliefs
|
||
title: Beliefs
|
||
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
||
status: verified
|
||
canonical_id: self
|
||
aliases: [신념, belief revision, Bayesian belief, knowledge, confirmation bias, doxastic logic]
|
||
duplicate_of: none
|
||
source_trust_level: B
|
||
confidence_score: 0.85
|
||
verification_status: applied
|
||
tags: [epistemology, beliefs, knowledge, bayesian, confirmation-bias, ai-belief, doxastic-logic]
|
||
raw_sources: []
|
||
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
||
github_commit: pending
|
||
tech_stack:
|
||
language: epistemology / cognitive science
|
||
applicable_to: [Agent Beliefs, RAG Trust, Bias Mitigation]
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Beliefs
|
||
|
||
## 📌 한 줄 통찰
|
||
> **"매 mind 의 잠정적 결론"**. 매 evidence 의 objective ↔ subjective 의 confidence. 매 action 의 trigger. 매 AI 의 응용 — 매 agent 의 belief state, 매 RAG 의 trust scoring, 매 confirmation bias 의 detect.
|
||
|
||
## 📖 핵심
|
||
|
||
### 매 정의 (philosophical)
|
||
- **Belief**: 매 proposition 의 true 의 mental acceptance.
|
||
- **Knowledge**: 매 Justified True Belief (Plato).
|
||
- **Gettier problem**: JTB 가 X 의 case (Gettier 1963).
|
||
- → 매 knowledge 의 stricter (no luck / safety / sensitivity).
|
||
|
||
### 매 belief 의 type
|
||
1. **Occurrent**: 매 active conscious thought.
|
||
2. **Dispositional**: 매 stored, 매 retrieve 매 ready.
|
||
3. **De dicto vs de re**: 매 about-words vs about-thing.
|
||
4. **Implicit / explicit**: 매 articulate-able.
|
||
|
||
### 매 belief revision (AGM)
|
||
- **Expansion**: 매 add (no conflict).
|
||
- **Contraction**: 매 remove.
|
||
- **Revision**: 매 add + remove 매 conflicting.
|
||
- **Postulates**: 매 closure, success, consistency, ...
|
||
|
||
### Bayesian belief
|
||
- 매 belief = 매 probability (degree of confidence).
|
||
- 매 update via Bayes (Cox theorem).
|
||
- 매 coherent.
|
||
- 매 modern AI 의 standard.
|
||
|
||
### 매 cognitive bias (belief 관련)
|
||
1. **Confirmation bias**: 매 belief 의 confirm 의 selective.
|
||
2. **Belief perseverance**: 매 disconfirming evidence 후 의 retain.
|
||
3. **Backfire effect**: 매 disconfirming evidence 의 strengthen.
|
||
4. **Sunk cost**: 매 commitment 의 belief 의 maintain.
|
||
5. **Motivated reasoning**: 매 want 의 believe.
|
||
|
||
### 매 AI / agent 의 응용
|
||
|
||
#### Belief state (POMDP)
|
||
- 매 partially observable.
|
||
- 매 belief = 매 distribution over state.
|
||
- 매 action 의 belief 의 update.
|
||
|
||
#### RAG trust score
|
||
- 매 retrieved document 의 belief.
|
||
- 매 confidence = recency × authority × consistency.
|
||
|
||
#### Multi-agent BDI (Belief-Desire-Intention)
|
||
- 매 belief: world state.
|
||
- 매 desire: goal.
|
||
- 매 intention: committed plan.
|
||
- 매 PRS, JADE.
|
||
|
||
#### LLM 의 belief
|
||
- 매 train 의 belief 의 instillation.
|
||
- 매 RLHF 의 alignment.
|
||
- 매 calibration: 매 P(true) 의 actual frequency.
|
||
|
||
### 매 epistemic logic
|
||
- 매 K_a φ: 매 agent a 의 knows φ.
|
||
- 매 B_a φ: 매 belief.
|
||
- 매 multi-agent: 매 common knowledge.
|
||
- 매 Aumann's agreement theorem: 매 rational 의 동의.
|
||
|
||
## 💻 패턴 (응용)
|
||
|
||
### Bayesian belief update
|
||
```python
|
||
def update_belief(prior, likelihood_true, likelihood_false, evidence):
|
||
# P(H | E) = P(E | H) * P(H) / P(E)
|
||
posterior_unnorm = likelihood_true * prior
|
||
evidence_prob = likelihood_true * prior + likelihood_false * (1 - prior)
|
||
return posterior_unnorm / evidence_prob
|
||
|
||
belief = 0.3 # 매 prior
|
||
belief = update_belief(belief, 0.9, 0.2, evidence=True) # 매 0.66
|
||
belief = update_belief(belief, 0.9, 0.2, evidence=True) # 매 0.90
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### POMDP belief state
|
||
```python
|
||
class POMDPBelief:
|
||
def __init__(self, n_states, prior):
|
||
self.belief = prior # np.array, sum=1
|
||
|
||
def update(self, action, observation, T, O):
|
||
# T: transition matrix, O: observation matrix
|
||
new_belief = np.zeros_like(self.belief)
|
||
for s_next in range(len(self.belief)):
|
||
new_belief[s_next] = O[s_next, observation] * \
|
||
sum(T[s, s_next, action] * self.belief[s] for s in range(len(self.belief)))
|
||
new_belief /= new_belief.sum()
|
||
self.belief = new_belief
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### BDI agent
|
||
```python
|
||
class BDIAgent:
|
||
def __init__(self):
|
||
self.beliefs = {} # 매 facts about world
|
||
self.desires = [] # 매 goals
|
||
self.intentions = [] # 매 active plans
|
||
|
||
def perceive(self, observations):
|
||
for obs in observations:
|
||
self.beliefs[obs.key] = obs.value
|
||
|
||
def deliberate(self):
|
||
# 매 desire selection based on belief
|
||
feasible = [d for d in self.desires if self.is_feasible(d)]
|
||
return max(feasible, key=lambda d: d.priority)
|
||
|
||
def plan(self, goal):
|
||
# 매 belief 기반 의 plan
|
||
return planner.plan(self.beliefs, goal)
|
||
|
||
def execute(self):
|
||
if not self.intentions:
|
||
goal = self.deliberate()
|
||
self.intentions = self.plan(goal)
|
||
action = self.intentions.pop(0)
|
||
return action
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### LLM calibration
|
||
```python
|
||
def calibration_check(model, eval_set):
|
||
# 매 P(true) 의 declared confidence vs actual
|
||
bins = [(0, 0.1), (0.1, 0.2), ..., (0.9, 1.0)]
|
||
bin_correct = {b: [] for b in bins}
|
||
|
||
for example in eval_set:
|
||
response = model.generate(example.prompt + ' Reply with answer and confidence (0-1).')
|
||
ans, conf = parse(response)
|
||
actual = (ans == example.expected)
|
||
for b in bins:
|
||
if b[0] <= conf < b[1]:
|
||
bin_correct[b].append(actual)
|
||
break
|
||
|
||
# 매 ECE (Expected Calibration Error)
|
||
ece = sum(abs(np.mean(corr) - (b[0]+b[1])/2) * len(corr) / len(eval_set)
|
||
for b, corr in bin_correct.items() if corr)
|
||
return ece
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
→ 매 well-calibrated = ECE 낮음.
|
||
|
||
### Confirmation bias detector
|
||
```python
|
||
def detect_confirmation_bias(query, results, user_belief):
|
||
# 매 user 의 belief 의 align 의 source 만 의 click?
|
||
aligning = [r for r in results if r.aligns_with(user_belief)]
|
||
clicked_aligning = sum(1 for r in aligning if r.clicked)
|
||
clicked_total = sum(1 for r in results if r.clicked)
|
||
|
||
if clicked_total == 0: return None
|
||
bias_ratio = clicked_aligning / clicked_total
|
||
return bias_ratio # 매 > 0.7 = 매 strong confirmation bias
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 🤔 결정 기준
|
||
| 응용 | Approach |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| Agent world model | POMDP belief |
|
||
| RAG trust | Source authority + consistency |
|
||
| Multi-agent | BDI |
|
||
| LLM calibration | ECE + temperature scaling |
|
||
| User UX | Diverse perspective + bias detect |
|
||
| Knowledge graph | Justified belief (provenance) |
|
||
|
||
**기본값**: Bayesian belief + ECE calibration + diverse evidence.
|
||
|
||
## 🔗 Graph
|
||
- 부모: [[Epistemology]]
|
||
- 변형: [[Knowledge]] · [[Bayesian-Belief]] · [[Doxastic-Logic]]
|
||
- 응용: [[POMDP]]
|
||
- 비판: [[Confirmation Bias]]
|
||
- Adjacent: [[Bayesian-Brain-Hypothesis]] · [[Multi-agent-System|Multi-Agent-Systems]]
|
||
|
||
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
||
**언제**: 매 agent design (belief state). 매 RAG trust scoring. 매 LLM calibration eval. 매 bias detection.
|
||
**언제 X**: 매 metaphysical claim 의 substitute. 매 single belief 의 deterministic system.
|
||
|
||
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
||
- **Belief 의 binary**: 매 confidence 의 lose.
|
||
- **No update**: 매 stale belief.
|
||
- **Confirmation bias 의 ignore**: 매 echo chamber.
|
||
- **Calibration 무시**: 매 over-confident model.
|
||
- **Multiple agent 의 belief 의 share assumption**: 매 multi-agent fail.
|
||
- **Belief 의 hard-code**: 매 update 의 X.
|
||
|
||
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
||
- Verified (Plato JTB, Gettier, AGM postulates, Bayesian).
|
||
- 신뢰도 B.
|
||
- Related: [[Bayesian Statistics]] · [[Bayesian-Brain-Hypothesis]] · [[Confirmation Bias]] · [[POMDP]].
|
||
|
||
## 🕓 Changelog
|
||
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
||
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — JTB + AGM + Bayesian + POMDP / BDI + 매 calibration code |
|