c24165b8bc
에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게 [공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류. 문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인). - Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존) - Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design - Topic_Business → Domain_Product - Topic_General → Domain_General - _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning), Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing) - 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서) - 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures) - 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.6 KiB
6.6 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-markov-random-fields | Markov Random Fields | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Markov Random Fields
매 한 줄
"매 undirected graph 의 joint distribution — local Markov property 의 satisfy". 매 Bayes net 의 directed counterpart — 매 conditional independence 의 graph separation 으로 read. Hammersley–Clifford (1971) 의 Gibbs distribution 의 equivalence — 2026 매 image segmentation, CRF, energy-based model (EBM) 의 underlie.
매 핵심
매 정의
- Graph
G = (V, E), 매 node 의 random variableX_v. - Local Markov:
X_v \perp X_{V \setminus N[v]} \mid X_{N(v)}— 매 node 의 neighbors 의 condition 시 의 rest 의 independent. - Hammersley–Clifford: 매 strictly positive joint 의 매 Gibbs form
P(x) = \frac{1}{Z} \prod_{C \in \mathcal{C}} \psi_C(x_C)— 매 clique 의 product. - Partition function:
Z = \sum_x \prod_C \psi_C(x_C)— 매 intractable in general.
매 inference
- Exact: tree (sum-product / belief propagation).
- Loopy BP: 매 approximate, 매 often works.
- MCMC: Gibbs sampling — 매 conditional 의 sample 매 cycle.
- Variational: mean-field — 매 factorized
q(x) = \prod_v q_v(x_v). - Graph cut: 매 binary submodular — 매 exact min-cut.
매 응용
- Image segmentation (foreground/background MRF).
- Conditional Random Fields (CRF) — sequence labeling.
- Stereo / depth estimation (smoothness prior).
- Energy-based generative models (EBMs).
- Statistical physics (Ising, Potts).
💻 패턴
Ising model — Gibbs sampling
import numpy as np
def ising_gibbs(N=64, beta=0.44, steps=10_000, h=0.0):
spins = np.random.choice([-1, 1], size=(N, N))
for _ in range(steps):
i, j = np.random.randint(N, size=2)
nb = (spins[(i+1)%N, j] + spins[(i-1)%N, j]
+ spins[i, (j+1)%N] + spins[i, (j-1)%N])
dE = 2 * spins[i, j] * (beta * nb + h)
if dE < 0 or np.random.random() < np.exp(-dE):
spins[i, j] *= -1
return spins
Loopy belief propagation (binary pairwise)
def loopy_bp(unary, pairwise, edges, iters=20):
# unary[v] : log-potential per node, shape (V, K)
# pairwise : (E, K, K) log-potentials
# edges : list of (u, v)
msg = {(u, v): np.zeros(unary.shape[1]) for u, v in edges}
msg.update({(v, u): np.zeros(unary.shape[1]) for u, v in edges})
for _ in range(iters):
new = {}
for (u, v), e_idx in zip(edges, range(len(edges))):
incoming = unary[u] + sum(msg[(w, u)] for w in neighbors(u) if w != v)
new[(u, v)] = np.logaddexp.reduce(
pairwise[e_idx] + incoming[:, None], axis=0)
new[(u, v)] -= new[(u, v)].max() # normalize
msg.update(new)
beliefs = np.array([
unary[v] + sum(msg[(u, v)] for u in neighbors(v))
for v in range(len(unary))])
return beliefs
Linear-chain CRF (PyTorch — sequence labeling)
import torch, torch.nn as nn
class LinearChainCRF(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, n_tags):
super().__init__()
self.trans = nn.Parameter(torch.randn(n_tags, n_tags))
def log_partition(self, emissions): # (T, K)
T, K = emissions.shape
alpha = emissions[0]
for t in range(1, T):
alpha = torch.logsumexp(
alpha[:, None] + self.trans + emissions[t][None, :], dim=0)
return torch.logsumexp(alpha, dim=0)
def score(self, emissions, tags):
s = emissions[0, tags[0]]
for t in range(1, len(tags)):
s = s + self.trans[tags[t-1], tags[t]] + emissions[t, tags[t]]
return s
def nll(self, emissions, tags):
return self.log_partition(emissions) - self.score(emissions, tags)
Graph cut for binary MRF (submodular)
import maxflow # PyMaxflow
def binary_mrf_graph_cut(unary_fg, unary_bg, pairwise_w):
H, W = unary_fg.shape
g = maxflow.Graph[float]()
nodes = g.add_grid_nodes((H, W))
g.add_grid_edges(nodes, pairwise_w) # smoothness
g.add_grid_tedges(nodes, unary_fg, unary_bg) # data term
g.maxflow()
return g.get_grid_segments(nodes) # bool mask
Mean-field VI
def mean_field(unary, pairwise, iters=10):
# q(x_v = k) ∝ exp(unary[v,k] + Σ_{u∈N(v)} Σ_l q(x_u=l) * pairwise[v,u,k,l])
q = torch.softmax(unary, dim=-1)
for _ in range(iters):
msg = torch.einsum('uvkl,ul->vk', pairwise, q)
q = torch.softmax(unary + msg, dim=-1)
return q
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Tree-structured | Sum-product (exact) |
| Loopy graph, fast | Loopy BP |
| Loopy graph, accurate | MCMC (Gibbs) — slower |
| Binary submodular | Graph cut (exact min-cut) |
| Sequence labeling (NER) | Linear-chain CRF |
| Image segmentation | Pairwise MRF + α-expansion / DenseCRF |
| Modern generative | Energy-Based Model (EBM) — score matching |
기본값: smallest model 의 first — chain → tree → loopy + BP → MCMC.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Probabilistic Graphical Models · Probability Theory
- 응용: Image Segmentation · Energy-Based Model
- Adjacent: Bayesian Network
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: clique factorization 의 derive, BP/Gibbs pseudocode, partition-function intractability 의 explain. 언제 X: 매 specific paper algorithm — original 의 의 cross-check.
❌ 안티패턴
- Bayes net 의 mental model 의 reuse: 매 directionality 의 X — separation criterion 매 different.
- Computing
Zfor large graph: 매 #P-hard — variational / MCMC. - Loopy BP on tightly-loopy graph: 매 may diverge — damping 의 try, MCMC 의 fallback.
- Linear-chain CRF 의 LSTM 으로 always replace: 매 small data 의 still wins, 매 calibration 의 better.
- Mean-field 의 multimodal posterior 의 use: 매 mode-seeking — 매 underestimate variance.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Hammersley & Clifford 1971; Koller & Friedman PGM 2009; Murphy PML 2022).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — MRF basics + BP/CRF/graph-cut 정리 |