d8a80f6272
이름만 다른(표기 변형) [[위키링크]]를 대상 문서의 canonical 제목으로 치환해 끊겼던 1,200개 링크를 연결. 제목/파일명 정규화 일치만 적용하고 별칭 매칭은 과병합 위험으로 제외(애매성 가드). 원본은 _link_reconcile_backup/ 에 백업. 도구: Datacollect/scripts/link_reconcile_apply.mjs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
245 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
245 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-extreme-programming-xp
|
|
title: Extreme Programming (XP)
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [XP, Beck XP, pair programming, TDD, continuous integration, refactoring]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.96
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [agile, xp, tdd, pair-programming, ci, software-engineering, beck]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: Universal
|
|
applicable_to: [Agile, Software Process]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Extreme Programming (XP)
|
|
|
|
## 매 한 줄
|
|
> **"매 best practice 의 의 의 의 extreme 의 turn"**. Kent Beck 1999. 매 TDD, 매 pair, 매 CI, 매 refactoring, 매 simple design. 매 modern: 매 XP 의 practices 의 mainstream — 매 XP 의 brand 의 fade, 매 spirit 의 retain (DevOps, trunk-based, AI-paired).
|
|
|
|
## 매 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 12 practices
|
|
1. **Planning game** (story points).
|
|
2. **Small releases**.
|
|
3. **Metaphor**.
|
|
4. **Simple design** (YAGNI).
|
|
5. **Testing** (TDD).
|
|
6. **Refactoring**.
|
|
7. **Pair programming**.
|
|
8. **Collective ownership**.
|
|
9. **Continuous integration**.
|
|
10. **40-hour week**.
|
|
11. **On-site customer**.
|
|
12. **Coding standards**.
|
|
|
|
### 매 5 values
|
|
- Communication, Simplicity, Feedback, Courage, Respect.
|
|
|
|
### 매 modern legacy
|
|
- **Trunk-based development**.
|
|
- **CI/CD**.
|
|
- **TDD** (still controversial).
|
|
- **AI-paired** (Copilot, Cursor) = modern pair.
|
|
- **Mob programming**.
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴
|
|
|
|
### TDD cycle (Red-Green-Refactor)
|
|
```python
|
|
# 매 1. Red — failing test
|
|
def test_email_validate():
|
|
assert validate_email('a@b.com') is True
|
|
assert validate_email('invalid') is False
|
|
|
|
# 매 2. Green — minimum
|
|
def validate_email(email):
|
|
return '@' in email
|
|
|
|
# 매 3. Refactor — pattern
|
|
import re
|
|
def validate_email(email):
|
|
return bool(re.match(r'^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$', email))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pair programming roles
|
|
```yaml
|
|
driver:
|
|
- types code
|
|
- tactical focus
|
|
- explains as goes
|
|
navigator:
|
|
- reviews + thinks ahead
|
|
- strategic
|
|
- catches bugs / typos
|
|
rotation: every 25 minutes
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Mob programming
|
|
```yaml
|
|
mob:
|
|
size: 3-5 people
|
|
driver_rotation: 5-10 min
|
|
laptop: single
|
|
goal: continuous learning + team alignment
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### CI pipeline
|
|
```yaml
|
|
on: { push: { branches: [main] } }
|
|
jobs:
|
|
test:
|
|
steps:
|
|
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
|
- run: npm ci
|
|
- run: npm test
|
|
- run: npm run lint
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Story (planning game)
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Story: User can reset password
|
|
|
|
### As a user
|
|
I want to reset my password
|
|
So that I can regain access
|
|
|
|
### Acceptance criteria
|
|
- [ ] Email field validates format
|
|
- [ ] Confirmation email sent
|
|
- [ ] Token expires after 1 hour
|
|
- [ ] Old password invalidated
|
|
|
|
### Estimate: 3 points
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Refactor — Extract Method
|
|
```typescript
|
|
// 매 before
|
|
function processOrder(order) {
|
|
// 매 20 lines mixing validation + calculation + persist
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 매 after
|
|
function processOrder(order) {
|
|
validate(order);
|
|
const total = calculateTotal(order);
|
|
persist({ ...order, total });
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Simple design (YAGNI)
|
|
```typescript
|
|
// 매 ❌ premature abstraction
|
|
class GenericRepository<T, K, ...> { ... }
|
|
|
|
// 매 ✅ simple
|
|
class UserRepository {
|
|
async find(id: string): Promise<User | null> { ... }
|
|
async save(u: User): Promise<void> { ... }
|
|
}
|
|
// 매 abstract 매 매 3rd similar repo
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Continuous integration (trunk-based)
|
|
```bash
|
|
# 매 short-lived branch (< 1 day)
|
|
git checkout -b feat/quick-fix
|
|
# 매 work
|
|
npm test
|
|
git add -p; git commit
|
|
git push
|
|
# 매 PR → review → merge → CI deploy
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### TDD with AI pair
|
|
```python
|
|
# 매 modern XP: AI as pair
|
|
# 매 driver: human writes test
|
|
def test_calculate_discount():
|
|
assert discount(100, 'STUDENT') == 10
|
|
assert discount(100, 'NONE') == 0
|
|
|
|
# 매 navigator (AI): suggests implementation
|
|
def discount(amount, code):
|
|
rules = {'STUDENT': 0.1, 'SENIOR': 0.15}
|
|
return amount * rules.get(code, 0)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### On-site customer (modern proxy)
|
|
```yaml
|
|
modern_equivalent:
|
|
- product_owner: dedicated PM
|
|
- user_research_loop: weekly
|
|
- support_rotation: engineers in support 1d/sprint
|
|
- real_user_feedback: in-app survey + hotjar
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Test coverage gate
|
|
```yaml
|
|
# 매 fail PR if coverage drops
|
|
- run: npm run coverage
|
|
- run: |
|
|
pct=$(jq '.total.lines.pct' coverage/coverage-summary.json)
|
|
if (( $(echo "$pct < 80" | bc -l) )); then exit 1; fi
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Refactoring catalog (Fowler)
|
|
```typescript
|
|
// 매 Inline Variable
|
|
// before
|
|
const result = calculate(); return result;
|
|
// after
|
|
return calculate();
|
|
|
|
// 매 Replace Magic Number
|
|
const TAX_RATE = 0.08;
|
|
return total * (1 + TAX_RATE);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 매 결정 기준
|
|
| 상황 | Practice |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Greenfield | All-in XP |
|
|
| Legacy + tests | TDD selectively |
|
|
| Solo dev | TDD + CI |
|
|
| Distributed team | CI + async pair |
|
|
| Scale-up | Trunk + feature flags |
|
|
| AI-augmented | Copilot + TDD |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: 매 modern XP = TDD + CI/CD + trunk-based + pair (or AI-pair) + simple design + small release.
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 부모: [[Agile]]
|
|
- 변형: [[Scrum]] · [[Kanban]] · [[Mob-Programming]]
|
|
- 응용: [[TDD]] · [[CI CD]] · [[Pair-Programming]] · [[Refactoring_Best_Practices|Refactoring]]
|
|
- Adjacent: [[Trunk-Based-Development]] · [[Development Communication Standards]] · [[Enterprise-Software-Engineering]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: 매 small team. 매 high-quality requirement. 매 evolving requirement.
|
|
**언제 X**: 매 strict regulatory waterfall.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Cherry-pick practices**: 매 synergy lose.
|
|
- **TDD without refactor**: 매 cruft.
|
|
- **Pair as overhead**: 매 communication 의 ignore.
|
|
- **No on-site customer**: 매 wrong product.
|
|
- **CI without tests**: 매 false safety.
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Beck XP Explained 1999/2004).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-04-26 | XP auto |
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — 12 practices + 매 TDD / pair / mob / CI / refactor code |
|