Antigravity Agent
f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
150 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
150 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-restorative-justice
|
|
title: Restorative Justice
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [Restorative Practice, RJ, Community Justice]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.85
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [justice, ethics, community, governance]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: n/a
|
|
framework: governance
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Restorative Justice
|
|
|
|
## 매 한 줄
|
|
> **"매 처벌이 아닌 관계 회복으로 갈등을 해결"**. 매 1970s Howard Zehr 의 정립, 매 New Zealand 1989 Family Group Conference 법제화 가 milestone. 매 2026 software/community governance, AI safety incident response 에도 적용.
|
|
|
|
## 매 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 vs Punitive Justice
|
|
- **Punitive**: "What law was broken? Who did it? What punishment?"
|
|
- **Restorative**: "Who was harmed? What are their needs? Whose obligations are these?"
|
|
- **Procedural**: rule-following 강조. RJ 는 outcome (harm repair) 강조.
|
|
|
|
### 매 핵심 가치
|
|
- **Accountability**: 책임 의 active 인정 — passive 처벌 X.
|
|
- **Healing**: victim, offender, community 모두 의 회복.
|
|
- **Voice**: stakeholder 모두 의 발언권.
|
|
- **Relationship**: 관계 회복 우선.
|
|
|
|
### 매 응용
|
|
1. School discipline (US, UK 의 도입).
|
|
2. Criminal justice diversion programs.
|
|
3. Workplace conflict (HR mediation).
|
|
4. Online community moderation (Discord, GitHub).
|
|
5. AI incident response (post-mortem culture).
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴
|
|
|
|
### Conference structure
|
|
```
|
|
1. Pre-conference: 매 stakeholder 와 facilitator 의 prep.
|
|
2. Storytelling: 매 each party 의 narrative.
|
|
3. Impact: harm 의 articulation.
|
|
4. Need identification: what would help?
|
|
5. Agreement: concrete actions.
|
|
6. Follow-up: accountability check.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Software incident (post-mortem)
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Post-Mortem: Production Outage 2026-05-09
|
|
|
|
## Who was affected
|
|
- 12,000 users (3hr API down)
|
|
- On-call engineer (sleep disruption)
|
|
- CS team (200 tickets)
|
|
|
|
## What happened (no blame)
|
|
- Deploy at 03:00 UTC introduced N+1 query
|
|
- Monitoring alert delayed 15min
|
|
|
|
## Repair
|
|
- [ ] Refund/credit affected users
|
|
- [ ] On-call rotation adjustment
|
|
- [ ] CS team additional comp
|
|
|
|
## Prevention (system, not person)
|
|
- [ ] Pre-deploy load test gate
|
|
- [ ] Alert threshold tightening
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Community moderation (RJ flow)
|
|
```ts
|
|
type Incident = {
|
|
reporter: UserId;
|
|
accused: UserId;
|
|
description: string;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
async function restorativeFlow(i: Incident) {
|
|
await dm(i.reporter, "We hear you. What outcome would help?");
|
|
const need = await waitReply(i.reporter);
|
|
await dm(i.accused, `A community member shared they were hurt by [...]. Are you open to a conversation?`);
|
|
if (await consent(i.accused)) {
|
|
await scheduleFacilitatedChat(i.reporter, i.accused, need);
|
|
} else {
|
|
await escalateToFormal(i);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Circle process
|
|
```
|
|
- 매 participant 의 talking piece 보유시 발언.
|
|
- 매 facilitator 의 question prompt 의 sequence.
|
|
- 매 silence OK.
|
|
- 매 agreement 의 collective.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Apology framework (Lazare)
|
|
```
|
|
1. Acknowledgment: "I did X."
|
|
2. Explanation (not excuse): "Because Y."
|
|
3. Remorse: "I see harm caused."
|
|
4. Repair: "I will Z to make it right."
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 매 결정 기준
|
|
| 상황 | Approach |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| First-time, low-harm | RJ conference |
|
|
| Repeated, predatory | Punitive + protection |
|
|
| Power imbalance severe | RJ X (re-traumatization risk) |
|
|
| Anonymous online harm | Hybrid (account action + community education) |
|
|
| Workplace senior→junior | RJ + structural change |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: harm-first framing + voluntary participation + structural prevention.
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 응용: [[Post-Mortem]] · [[Conflict Resolution]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: post-mortem template 작성, mediation script 초안, policy review.
|
|
**언제 X**: live mediation (human empathy 의 irreplaceable).
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Forced participation**: 매 victim 의 secondary harm.
|
|
- **Surface-only**: structural cause 의 외면.
|
|
- **No follow-up**: agreement 후 accountability gap.
|
|
- **Power blind**: senior↔junior 의 same-level treatment.
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Howard Zehr "Changing Lenses", UN handbook 2020).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — RJ + software application |
|