f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.0 KiB
7.0 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-predictive-refactoring | Predictive Refactoring | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.85 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Predictive Refactoring
매 한 줄
"매 LLM + 매 static-analysis + 매 git-history 를 결합해 '여기를 곧 고쳐야 한다'를 예측하고 매 PR 으로 제안". 매 reactive code review 가 매 proactive 로 이동. 매 2026 의 Claude Opus 4.7 / GPT-5 + 매 codebase RAG 의 핵심 use-case.
매 핵심
매 어디까지가 PR 인가
- Reactive: 매 code 작성 후 IDE 의 quick-fix.
- Predictive: 매 commit 패턴 / churn / 매 complexity drift 의 분석으로 매 미래 hotspot 예측 → 매 사전 PR.
- Continuous: 매 main 에 push 마다 매 background agent 가 분석 → 매 weekly digest.
매 신호
- Code churn: 매 같은 file 의 매 commit 빈도.
- Complexity drift: 매 cyclomatic / cognitive complexity 가 매 임계 초과 향하는 추세.
- Test coverage erosion: 매 module의 매 coverage 하락.
- Code-smell ML model: 매 long method, large class, feature envy 의 학습된 detector.
- Issue / bug correlation: 매 bug 가 자주 나는 file.
- AST embedding similarity drift: 매 module 이 매 codebase 의 다른 module 패턴에서 멀어짐.
매 ML / LLM 결합
- Static feature extraction (tree-sitter AST) → 매 vector.
- History feature (git log) → 매 churn time-series.
- LLM 매 candidate refactoring 생성 + 매 risk 평가 + 매 explanation.
- Validation 매 test run + 매 type-check + 매 mutation testing.
매 trust gate
- 매 LLM 제안의 자동 merge X.
- 매 small / mechanical (rename, extract) — 매 high-confidence auto-PR.
- 매 architectural (split module, change interface) — 매 RFC 형식 review request.
💻 패턴
Hotspot detection (churn × complexity)
type FileMetric = { path: string; churn30d: number; cyclomatic: number; bugs90d: number };
function rankHotspots(metrics: FileMetric[]) {
const max = (k: keyof FileMetric) =>
Math.max(...metrics.map(m => m[k] as number)) || 1;
const Mc = max("churn30d"), Mx = max("cyclomatic"), Mb = max("bugs90d");
return metrics
.map(m => ({
...m,
score: (m.churn30d / Mc) * 0.4 +
(m.cyclomatic / Mx) * 0.4 +
(m.bugs90d / Mb) * 0.2,
}))
.sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score)
.slice(0, 20);
}
LLM refactoring suggestion (Claude Code SDK)
import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk";
const client = new Anthropic();
async function suggestRefactor(filePath: string, source: string) {
const res = await client.messages.create({
model: "claude-opus-4-7",
max_tokens: 4096,
system: [{
type: "text",
text: "매 senior staff engineer. 매 unsafe / large refactor 의 reject. 매 small testable steps.",
cache_control: { type: "ephemeral" },
}],
messages: [{
role: "user",
content: `파일: ${filePath}\n\n\`\`\`\n${source}\n\`\`\`\n\n` +
"매 1) 가장 시급한 refactoring 1개 + 매 2) diff (unified) + 매 3) risk 평가 + 매 4) test 추가 제안.",
}],
});
return parseStructured(res);
}
Auto-PR generation (mechanical refactor)
async function autoRefactorPR(repo: string, suggestion: Suggestion) {
if (suggestion.risk !== "low" || suggestion.kind !== "mechanical") return;
const branch = `refactor/predict-${suggestion.id}`;
await git.createBranch(repo, branch);
await git.applyDiff(repo, branch, suggestion.diff);
const tests = await ci.run(repo, branch);
if (!tests.green) return; // 매 abort
await github.openPR(repo, {
base: "main", head: branch,
title: `refactor: ${suggestion.title}`,
body: prTemplate(suggestion),
labels: ["predictive-refactor", "auto"],
reviewers: [suggestion.codeOwner],
});
}
Risk classifier
function classifyRisk(s: Suggestion): "low" | "med" | "high" {
if (s.linesChanged > 200 || s.filesTouched > 5) return "high";
if (s.touchesPublicAPI || s.touchesMigration) return "high";
if (s.changesBehavior) return "med";
return "low"; // 매 rename, extract local fn, dead code, type tightening
}
Continuous monitor (GitHub Action)
name: Predictive Refactoring
on:
schedule: [{ cron: "0 4 * * 1" }] # 매 주 월요일 새벽
workflow_dispatch: {}
jobs:
scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with: { fetch-depth: 0 }
- run: npx tree-sitter parse . > ast.json
- run: node scripts/hotspots.js > hotspots.json
- uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
mode: refactor-digest
input: hotspots.json
api-key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
- uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
title: "weekly: 매 predictive refactoring digest"
body-path: digest.md
Mutation-test gated merge
# 매 refactor 가 behavior 보존인지 확인
npx stryker run --reporters dashboard,json
# 매 mutation score ≥ pre-refactor 일 때만 merge 허용
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Mechanical (rename, extract) | LLM auto-PR + CI green |
| Logic 보존 needed | Mutation testing gate |
| API change | RFC + human review |
| Cross-module | RFC + ADR + staged plan |
| Legacy module no tests | 매 test scaffold 먼저, refactor 후 |
| Hotspot 미발견 | churn/complexity threshold 낮춤 |
기본값: 매 weekly digest + 매 low-risk auto-PR + 매 high-risk RFC.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Refactoring_Best_Practices
- 변형: Automated Refactoring Tools
- 응용: Claude Code
- Adjacent: Code Smells · Code Churn · Mutation Testing · Static Analysis
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 codebase >50k LoC, 매 ongoing maintenance, 매 hot-spot 의 패턴화 가능. 언제 X: 매 prototype, 매 throwaway, 매 매우 작은 codebase — 매 overhead.
❌ 안티패턴
- 자동 merge of LLM diff: 매 hallucination / behavior break. → 매 항상 CI + 매 PR review.
- Refactor without tests: 매 mutation/regression 무방어.
- Big-bang refactor: 매 small steps 무시.
- Score 만 보고 hotspot 따라가기: 매 churn 이 곧 file 의 healthy domain change 일 수도.
- No code-owner routing: 매 PR floods.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Microsoft Research churn-bug correlation, "Your Code as a Crime Scene" Adam Tornhill, Anthropic Claude Code SDK docs, Stryker mutation testing).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — hotspot signals + LLM-assisted PR pipeline |