150 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
150 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-소프트웨어-아키텍처-베스트-프랙티스
|
|
title: 소프트웨어 아키텍처 베스트 프랙티스
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [Architecture Best Practices, SW Architecture Patterns]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.9
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [architecture, best-practices, patterns]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: agnostic
|
|
framework: agnostic
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 소프트웨어 아키텍처 베스트 프랙티스
|
|
|
|
## 매 한 줄
|
|
> **"매 best practice는 매 context-bound이며, 매 trade-off 의 명시 없이 적용 시 매 cargo cult로 전락한다"**. Fowler / Vernon / Newman의 매 distillation은 매 boundary 의 명확화, 매 dependency 의 inversion, 매 deployment 의 independence를 매 핵심으로 본다.
|
|
|
|
## 매 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 SOLID at architecture level
|
|
- **SRP**: 매 service 매 single business capability.
|
|
- **OCP**: 매 plugin / 매 extension point.
|
|
- **LSP**: 매 contract-based versioning.
|
|
- **ISP**: 매 client-specific API (BFF).
|
|
- **DIP**: 매 ports & adapters.
|
|
|
|
### 매 Cloud-native principles (12-factor + extensions)
|
|
- 매 stateless processes.
|
|
- 매 config via env.
|
|
- 매 backing services as attached resources.
|
|
- 매 disposability (fast startup, graceful shutdown).
|
|
- 매 logs as event streams.
|
|
- 매 health endpoints (`/healthz`, `/readyz`).
|
|
- 매 telemetry by default (OpenTelemetry).
|
|
|
|
### 매 응용
|
|
1. 매 deployment 독립성으로 매 release cadence 향상.
|
|
2. 매 boundary 명확화로 매 team autonomy.
|
|
3. 매 observability 매 ship-time guarantee.
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴
|
|
|
|
### Health endpoint (Spring Boot)
|
|
```java
|
|
@RestController
|
|
class HealthController {
|
|
@GetMapping("/healthz") // liveness
|
|
ResponseEntity<?> live() { return ResponseEntity.ok().build(); }
|
|
|
|
@GetMapping("/readyz") // readiness
|
|
ResponseEntity<?> ready(DataSource ds) {
|
|
try (var c = ds.getConnection()) {
|
|
c.prepareStatement("SELECT 1").execute();
|
|
return ResponseEntity.ok().build();
|
|
} catch (Exception e) {
|
|
return ResponseEntity.status(503).build();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Circuit breaker (Resilience4j)
|
|
```java
|
|
CircuitBreaker cb = CircuitBreaker.of("payment",
|
|
CircuitBreakerConfig.custom()
|
|
.failureRateThreshold(50)
|
|
.slowCallDurationThreshold(Duration.ofSeconds(2))
|
|
.waitDurationInOpenState(Duration.ofSeconds(30))
|
|
.build());
|
|
|
|
Supplier<Receipt> guarded = CircuitBreaker
|
|
.decorateSupplier(cb, () -> paymentClient.charge(req));
|
|
return Try.ofSupplier(guarded).recover(t -> Receipt.queued()).get();
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Outbox pattern (Postgres + Debezium)
|
|
```sql
|
|
BEGIN;
|
|
INSERT INTO orders (id, status) VALUES ($1, 'CONFIRMED');
|
|
INSERT INTO outbox (aggregate_id, type, payload)
|
|
VALUES ($1, 'OrderConfirmed', $2);
|
|
COMMIT;
|
|
-- Debezium reads outbox table → publishes to Kafka
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Idempotency key (REST)
|
|
```python
|
|
@app.post("/payments")
|
|
def charge(req: ChargeReq, idempotency_key: str = Header(...)):
|
|
cached = redis.get(f"idem:{idempotency_key}")
|
|
if cached:
|
|
return json.loads(cached)
|
|
result = process(req)
|
|
redis.setex(f"idem:{idempotency_key}", 86400, json.dumps(result))
|
|
return result
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Feature flag (LaunchDarkly-style)
|
|
```typescript
|
|
if (await flags.isEnabled("new-checkout", { userId })) {
|
|
return newCheckout(cart);
|
|
}
|
|
return legacyCheckout(cart);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 매 결정 기준
|
|
| 상황 | Approach |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 매 cross-service consistency | Outbox + Kafka |
|
|
| 매 retry safety | Idempotency key |
|
|
| 매 cascading failure 방지 | Circuit breaker |
|
|
| 매 zero-downtime release | Feature flag + blue/green |
|
|
| 매 schema evolution | Backward-compatible (additive) only |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: 매 12-factor + OpenTelemetry + idempotency.
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 부모: [[소프트웨어 아키텍처 설계]]
|
|
- 변형: [[Microservices]] · [[Modular Monolith]]
|
|
- 응용: [[Outbox Pattern]] · [[Circuit Breaker]] · [[Saga]]
|
|
- Adjacent: [[12-Factor App]] · [[OpenTelemetry]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: 매 best practice 의 trade-off 설명 / 매 idempotency key generation.
|
|
**언제 X**: 매 specific SLA tuning — 매 production data 기반 결정 필요.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Cargo cult microservices**: 매 boundary 없이 매 split.
|
|
- **Distributed transaction**: 매 2PC across services.
|
|
- **Shared database**: 매 service 간 매 schema 공유.
|
|
- **Dual write**: 매 outbox 없이 매 DB + Kafka 동시 write.
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Newman, *Building Microservices 2e*; Vernon, *Implementing DDD*; Fowler, *Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture*).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — 매 outbox / circuit breaker / idempotency 추가 |
|