Files
2nd/10_Wiki/Topic_General/Education/Management Consulting.md
T
Antigravity Agent 9148c358d0 docs(10_Wiki): 위키 전체 재구성 — Topic_* 폴더를 4개 카테고리로 통합 + 대규모 중복 제거
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를
Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류.

- 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로
  자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거,
  동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거.
- 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming,
  Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business,
  Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로,
  나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는
  title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백).
  원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지.
- 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서.
- 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는
  지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지.
- Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경.
- 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
2026-07-05 00:33:48 +09:00

156 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
id: wiki-2026-0508-management-consulting
title: Management Consulting
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [경영 컨설팅, Strategy Consulting, Mgmt Consulting]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.9
verification_status: applied
tags: [education, consulting, strategy, business]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: english
framework: business
---
# Management Consulting
## 매 한 줄
> **"매 management consulting 은 hypothesis-driven problem solving as a service"**. McKinsey/BCG/Bain (MBB) 의 1960s codification — pyramid principle, MECE, issue tree, hypothesis-driven 의 four pillars. 매 2026 modern state: AI augmentation (Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5) 으로 research/synthesis 의 80% acceleration, but human judgment + executive trust 가 still core.
## 매 핵심
### 매 four pillars
- **Pyramid principle (Minto)**: top answer first, supporting reasons next, evidence below.
- **MECE**: Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive — partition framework.
- **Issue tree**: top question → sub-questions, recursively.
- **Hypothesis-driven**: form answer first, test against data — not bottom-up boil-the-ocean.
### 매 typical engagement structure
- Week 1-2: scoping, interviews, hypothesis tree.
- Week 3-6: data gathering, model building, expert calls.
- Week 7-9: synthesis, slide drafting, partner reviews.
- Week 10-12: client workshops, final readout, implementation roadmap.
### 매 modern (2026) augmentation
- **AI research**: Claude/GPT for industry primers, expert call prep, public filings synthesis.
- **AI modeling**: code-interpreter for forecasts, sensitivity tables.
- **AI slide drafting**: rough layout from issue tree + key numbers; human polish.
- **Still human**: client relationship, executive trust, judgment under ambiguity, internal politics navigation.
### 매 firm tiers
1. **MBB**: McKinsey, BCG, Bain.
2. **Tier 2**: Strategy&, Oliver Wyman, LEK, Roland Berger, Kearney.
3. **Big 4 strategy**: Deloitte Monitor, EY-Parthenon, PwC Strategy&, KPMG.
4. **Boutique**: Veritas, Putnam, Analysis Group (specialized).
## 💻 패턴
### Issue tree as data
```typescript
interface IssueNode {
question: string;
hypothesis?: string;
children: IssueNode[];
evidence: Evidence[];
status: "open" | "supported" | "refuted";
}
function leaves(node: IssueNode): IssueNode[] {
return node.children.length === 0 ? [node] : node.children.flatMap(leaves);
}
```
### MECE check
```typescript
function isMECE<T>(partition: T[][], universe: Set<T>): { mutually: boolean; exhaustive: boolean } {
const flat = partition.flat();
const mutually = flat.length === new Set(flat).size;
const exhaustive = [...universe].every((x) => flat.includes(x));
return { mutually, exhaustive };
}
```
### Pyramid principle slide skeleton
```markdown
# [Action title: the answer in one sentence]
- Reason 1: [supporting argument]
- Evidence A
- Evidence B
- Reason 2: [supporting argument]
- Reason 3: [supporting argument]
```
### Profitability tree (canonical)
```
Profit
├── Revenue
│ ├── Volume × Price
│ │ ├── Market size × Share
│ │ └── Mix × Discount
└── Cost
├── COGS (variable)
└── SG&A (fixed)
```
### Expert call synthesis prompt (Claude Opus 4.7)
```typescript
const prompt = `
You are a research analyst. Given these 5 expert call transcripts on [TOPIC],
extract:
1. Areas of consensus (≥3 experts agree)
2. Areas of disagreement
3. Quantitative anchors (market size, growth, margin)
4. Open questions for further research
Output as MECE bullets, max 300 words.
`;
```
### 2x2 framework template
```markdown
| | High Impact | Low Impact |
|--------------|-------------|------------|
| Easy to do | DO NOW | Quick wins |
| Hard to do | Strategic | DROP |
```
## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| C-suite strategy refresh | MBB or Tier 2 strategy boutique |
| Operational turnaround | Big 4 + ops specialists (AlixPartners) |
| M&A due diligence | Bain (PE focus), strategy boutiques |
| Digital/AI transformation | McKinsey QuantumBlack, BCG X, Bain Vector |
| In-house build | Hire ex-consultant + AI tooling |
**기본값**: Hypothesis-driven + issue tree + MBB-style synthesis. AI augmentation for research/modeling. Human for trust/judgment.
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Business Strategy]]
- 변형: [[Strategy Consulting]]
- 응용: [[Pyramid Principle]] · [[Issue Tree]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: industry primer, expert call prep, slide drafting, financial modeling, synthesis.
**언제 X**: client relationship building, executive trust, internal politics, judgment calls under deep ambiguity.
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Boil the ocean**: hypothesis 없이 모든 data 모음 → time/budget overrun.
- **Pretty slides, weak answer**: aesthetics > insight 의 trap.
- **Recommendation without data**: "we believe" without grounding.
- **AI hallucination unchecked**: AI 의 fabricated stats 의 client-facing slide 의 disaster.
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Minto's Pyramid Principle, McKinsey/BCG/Bain public materials, 2026 industry observation).
- 신뢰도 A.
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — FULL spec rewrite with 2026 AI augmentation context |