f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
157 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
157 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-creativity-research
|
|
title: Creativity Research
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [Creativity Studies, Creative Cognition Research]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.9
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [creativity, psychology, cognition, research]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: en
|
|
framework: research-methods
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Creativity Research
|
|
|
|
## 매 한 줄
|
|
> **"매 creativity 의 measurable cognitive process — 매 mystical talent 아님"**. 매 1950 Guilford APA address 가 field 의 launch — 매 divergent thinking, fluency, originality 의 quantifiable. 매 2026 의 LLM-augmented co-creation, fMRI 의 default mode network 연구, computational creativity 의 active.
|
|
|
|
## 매 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 4P framework (Rhodes 1961)
|
|
- **Person**: 매 traits — openness, tolerance for ambiguity, intrinsic motivation.
|
|
- **Process**: 매 stages — preparation → incubation → illumination → verification (Wallas 1926).
|
|
- **Product**: 매 novel + useful (Stein 1953 의 standard definition).
|
|
- **Press**: 매 environment — domain, field gatekeepers (Csikszentmihalyi systems model).
|
|
|
|
### 매 측정 (psychometrics)
|
|
- **TTCT** (Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking): 매 fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration.
|
|
- **AUT** (Alternative Uses Task): 매 brick 의 uses 나열 — 매 divergent thinking 의 standard.
|
|
- **CAT** (Consensual Assessment Technique, Amabile): 매 expert judges 의 product rating.
|
|
- **RAT** (Remote Associates): 매 convergent creativity (3 cue → 1 link word).
|
|
|
|
### 매 응용
|
|
1. K-12 design thinking curriculum.
|
|
2. 매 R&D ideation workshop (IDEO 의 protocols).
|
|
3. 매 LLM prompt engineering 의 creativity scaffolding.
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴
|
|
|
|
### Divergent thinking score (AUT)
|
|
```python
|
|
def aut_score(responses: list[str], reference_corpus: dict[str, int]) -> dict:
|
|
"""Score divergent-thinking output: fluency, flexibility, originality."""
|
|
fluency = len(responses)
|
|
categories = {classify_category(r) for r in responses}
|
|
flexibility = len(categories)
|
|
# originality = 1 - frequency in reference corpus (lower freq = more original)
|
|
total = sum(reference_corpus.values()) or 1
|
|
originality = sum(
|
|
1 - (reference_corpus.get(r.lower(), 0) / total) for r in responses
|
|
) / max(fluency, 1)
|
|
return {"fluency": fluency, "flexibility": flexibility, "originality": originality}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### LLM-augmented divergent ideation
|
|
```python
|
|
from anthropic import Anthropic
|
|
|
|
client = Anthropic()
|
|
|
|
def co_creative_ideation(prompt: str, n: int = 20) -> list[str]:
|
|
"""Use Claude as a divergent-thinking partner — temperature high for variance."""
|
|
msg = client.messages.create(
|
|
model="claude-opus-4-7",
|
|
max_tokens=2000,
|
|
temperature=1.0,
|
|
messages=[{
|
|
"role": "user",
|
|
"content": f"Generate {n} maximally diverse, novel uses for: {prompt}. "
|
|
f"Span categories. Avoid clichés. One per line."
|
|
}],
|
|
)
|
|
return [line.strip("- ") for line in msg.content[0].text.splitlines() if line.strip()]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Consensual Assessment (CAT) aggregation
|
|
```python
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
from scipy.stats import pearsonr
|
|
|
|
def cat_reliability(ratings: np.ndarray) -> float:
|
|
"""Inter-rater reliability via Cronbach's alpha across expert judges."""
|
|
k = ratings.shape[1]
|
|
item_var = ratings.var(axis=0, ddof=1).sum()
|
|
total_var = ratings.sum(axis=1).var(ddof=1)
|
|
return (k / (k - 1)) * (1 - item_var / total_var)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Incubation effect simulation
|
|
```python
|
|
def incubation_benefit(initial_attempt_score: float, incubation_minutes: int) -> float:
|
|
"""Sio & Ormerod 2009 meta-analysis: ~0.3 SD boost after incubation."""
|
|
if incubation_minutes < 5:
|
|
return initial_attempt_score
|
|
return initial_attempt_score + 0.3 * min(incubation_minutes / 30, 1.0)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Default Mode Network proxy (resting-state correlation)
|
|
```python
|
|
def dmn_creativity_correlation(dmn_connectivity: float, ecn_connectivity: float) -> float:
|
|
"""Beaty et al. 2018: high creativity = strong DMN ↔ ECN coupling."""
|
|
return dmn_connectivity * ecn_connectivity # simplified product proxy
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Equivalence-class feature (Mednick RAT)
|
|
```python
|
|
def remote_associates_solve(cues: tuple[str, str, str], assoc_db: dict) -> str | None:
|
|
"""Find a single word that associates with all three cues."""
|
|
sets = [set(assoc_db.get(c, [])) for c in cues]
|
|
common = set.intersection(*sets)
|
|
return next(iter(common), None)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 매 결정 기준
|
|
| 상황 | Approach |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Quick classroom screen | TTCT short form |
|
|
| Real-world product creativity | CAT with 3+ domain experts |
|
|
| Lab divergent thinking | AUT + originality corpus |
|
|
| Insight problem solving | RAT or compound remote associates |
|
|
| LLM augmentation | high-temperature ideation + human convergent filter |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: 매 AUT + CAT for research; 매 LLM-as-divergent-partner + human-as-convergent-filter for applied work.
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 부모: [[Cognitive Psychology]]
|
|
- 변형: [[Divergent Thinking]] · [[Convergent Thinking]] · [[Computational_Creativity|Computational Creativity]]
|
|
- 응용: [[Design Thinking]] · [[Brainstorming]]
|
|
- Adjacent: [[Default Mode Network]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: 매 divergent ideation phase — 매 broad space exploration, 매 cliché breaking, 매 cross-domain analogies.
|
|
**언제 X**: 매 convergent evaluation alone — 매 LLM 의 novelty calibration 의 약함 (training data bias toward common). 매 originality scoring 시 의 corpus-based metric 결합 필요.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Brainstorming = creativity 의 동일시**: 매 group brainstorming 의 production blocking — 매 nominal groups 가 실제로 더 많은 ideas (Diehl & Stroebe 1987).
|
|
- **Originality 만 추적**: 매 useful 의 손실 — 매 novel + useful 가 정의.
|
|
- **Single judge CAT**: 매 inter-rater reliability 의 unverifiable.
|
|
- **TTCT 만 의 의존**: 매 ecological validity 의 약함 — real-world creative achievement prediction 의 modest (r ≈ 0.2-0.3).
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Guilford 1950, Torrance 1966, Amabile 1982, Beaty et al. 2018 NeuroImage).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — 4P framework, AUT/CAT/RAT measurement, LLM co-creation patterns 추가 |
|