Files
2nd/10_Wiki/Topics/Education/Management Consulting.md
T
Antigravity Agent f8b21af4be Wiki cleanup: error-doc removal, dedup merge, link normalization
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리:
- 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거
- 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect)
- 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건
- 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성
- Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 23:52:15 +09:00

156 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
id: wiki-2026-0508-management-consulting
title: Management Consulting
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [경영 컨설팅, Strategy Consulting, Mgmt Consulting]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.9
verification_status: applied
tags: [education, consulting, strategy, business]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: english
framework: business
---
# Management Consulting
## 매 한 줄
> **"매 management consulting 은 hypothesis-driven problem solving as a service"**. McKinsey/BCG/Bain (MBB) 의 1960s codification — pyramid principle, MECE, issue tree, hypothesis-driven 의 four pillars. 매 2026 modern state: AI augmentation (Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5) 으로 research/synthesis 의 80% acceleration, but human judgment + executive trust 가 still core.
## 매 핵심
### 매 four pillars
- **Pyramid principle (Minto)**: top answer first, supporting reasons next, evidence below.
- **MECE**: Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive — partition framework.
- **Issue tree**: top question → sub-questions, recursively.
- **Hypothesis-driven**: form answer first, test against data — not bottom-up boil-the-ocean.
### 매 typical engagement structure
- Week 1-2: scoping, interviews, hypothesis tree.
- Week 3-6: data gathering, model building, expert calls.
- Week 7-9: synthesis, slide drafting, partner reviews.
- Week 10-12: client workshops, final readout, implementation roadmap.
### 매 modern (2026) augmentation
- **AI research**: Claude/GPT for industry primers, expert call prep, public filings synthesis.
- **AI modeling**: code-interpreter for forecasts, sensitivity tables.
- **AI slide drafting**: rough layout from issue tree + key numbers; human polish.
- **Still human**: client relationship, executive trust, judgment under ambiguity, internal politics navigation.
### 매 firm tiers
1. **MBB**: McKinsey, BCG, Bain.
2. **Tier 2**: Strategy&, Oliver Wyman, LEK, Roland Berger, Kearney.
3. **Big 4 strategy**: Deloitte Monitor, EY-Parthenon, PwC Strategy&, KPMG.
4. **Boutique**: Veritas, Putnam, Analysis Group (specialized).
## 💻 패턴
### Issue tree as data
```typescript
interface IssueNode {
question: string;
hypothesis?: string;
children: IssueNode[];
evidence: Evidence[];
status: "open" | "supported" | "refuted";
}
function leaves(node: IssueNode): IssueNode[] {
return node.children.length === 0 ? [node] : node.children.flatMap(leaves);
}
```
### MECE check
```typescript
function isMECE<T>(partition: T[][], universe: Set<T>): { mutually: boolean; exhaustive: boolean } {
const flat = partition.flat();
const mutually = flat.length === new Set(flat).size;
const exhaustive = [...universe].every((x) => flat.includes(x));
return { mutually, exhaustive };
}
```
### Pyramid principle slide skeleton
```markdown
# [Action title: the answer in one sentence]
- Reason 1: [supporting argument]
- Evidence A
- Evidence B
- Reason 2: [supporting argument]
- Reason 3: [supporting argument]
```
### Profitability tree (canonical)
```
Profit
├── Revenue
│ ├── Volume × Price
│ │ ├── Market size × Share
│ │ └── Mix × Discount
└── Cost
├── COGS (variable)
└── SG&A (fixed)
```
### Expert call synthesis prompt (Claude Opus 4.7)
```typescript
const prompt = `
You are a research analyst. Given these 5 expert call transcripts on [TOPIC],
extract:
1. Areas of consensus (≥3 experts agree)
2. Areas of disagreement
3. Quantitative anchors (market size, growth, margin)
4. Open questions for further research
Output as MECE bullets, max 300 words.
`;
```
### 2x2 framework template
```markdown
| | High Impact | Low Impact |
|--------------|-------------|------------|
| Easy to do | DO NOW | Quick wins |
| Hard to do | Strategic | DROP |
```
## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| C-suite strategy refresh | MBB or Tier 2 strategy boutique |
| Operational turnaround | Big 4 + ops specialists (AlixPartners) |
| M&A due diligence | Bain (PE focus), strategy boutiques |
| Digital/AI transformation | McKinsey QuantumBlack, BCG X, Bain Vector |
| In-house build | Hire ex-consultant + AI tooling |
**기본값**: Hypothesis-driven + issue tree + MBB-style synthesis. AI augmentation for research/modeling. Human for trust/judgment.
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Business Strategy]]
- 변형: [[Strategy Consulting]]
- 응용: [[Pyramid Principle]] · [[Issue Tree]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: industry primer, expert call prep, slide drafting, financial modeling, synthesis.
**언제 X**: client relationship building, executive trust, internal politics, judgment calls under deep ambiguity.
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Boil the ocean**: hypothesis 없이 모든 data 모음 → time/budget overrun.
- **Pretty slides, weak answer**: aesthetics > insight 의 trap.
- **Recommendation without data**: "we believe" without grounding.
- **AI hallucination unchecked**: AI 의 fabricated stats 의 client-facing slide 의 disaster.
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Minto's Pyramid Principle, McKinsey/BCG/Bain public materials, 2026 industry observation).
- 신뢰도 A.
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — FULL spec rewrite with 2026 AI augmentation context |