f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
172 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
172 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-simple-event-processing
|
|
title: Simple Event Processing
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [SEP, Direct Event Handling, 1:1 Event Processing]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.9
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [event-driven, architecture, eda, messaging]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: typescript
|
|
framework: kafka
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Simple Event Processing
|
|
|
|
## 매 한 줄
|
|
> **"매 1 event → 1 reaction. No correlation, no aggregation, no temporal pattern."**. 매 EDA 의 simplest tier — notable event 의 detect 후 매 single downstream action 의 trigger. 매 CEP (Complex Event Processing) / ESP (Event Stream Processing) 와 대비되는 매 baseline pattern.
|
|
|
|
## 매 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 SEP vs ESP vs CEP
|
|
- **SEP**: 1 event → 1 action. No state, no correlation.
|
|
- **ESP**: stream 의 windowing, aggregation (Flink, Kafka Streams).
|
|
- **CEP**: pattern matching across events (Drools Fusion, Esper).
|
|
|
|
### 매 properties
|
|
- Stateless (매 event 의 self-contained).
|
|
- Low latency (no buffering / windowing).
|
|
- High throughput (parallelize trivially).
|
|
- Idempotent handlers preferred (at-least-once delivery).
|
|
|
|
### 매 응용
|
|
1. Order placed → email confirmation.
|
|
2. User signup → welcome workflow.
|
|
3. Sensor reading → threshold alert.
|
|
4. Payment captured → inventory reserve.
|
|
5. Log line → metric increment.
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴
|
|
|
|
### Kafka consumer (TypeScript)
|
|
```typescript
|
|
import { Kafka } from 'kafkajs';
|
|
|
|
const kafka = new Kafka({ brokers: ['localhost:9092'] });
|
|
const consumer = kafka.consumer({ groupId: 'order-emails' });
|
|
|
|
await consumer.subscribe({ topic: 'orders.placed' });
|
|
await consumer.run({
|
|
eachMessage: async ({ message }) => {
|
|
const order = JSON.parse(message.value!.toString());
|
|
await sendOrderEmail(order.userId, order.id);
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### AWS EventBridge rule
|
|
```typescript
|
|
import { EventBridgeClient, PutRuleCommand } from '@aws-sdk/client-eventbridge';
|
|
|
|
await client.send(new PutRuleCommand({
|
|
Name: 'order-placed-email',
|
|
EventPattern: JSON.stringify({
|
|
source: ['app.orders'],
|
|
'detail-type': ['OrderPlaced'],
|
|
}),
|
|
Targets: [{ Arn: lambdaArn, Id: 'send-email' }],
|
|
}));
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### NATS subject handler
|
|
```typescript
|
|
import { connect, StringCodec } from 'nats';
|
|
|
|
const nc = await connect({ servers: 'nats://localhost:4222' });
|
|
const sc = StringCodec();
|
|
const sub = nc.subscribe('orders.placed');
|
|
|
|
for await (const msg of sub) {
|
|
const order = JSON.parse(sc.decode(msg.data));
|
|
await reserveInventory(order);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Idempotent handler
|
|
```typescript
|
|
async function handleOrderPlaced(event: OrderEvent) {
|
|
const seen = await redis.set(`processed:${event.id}`, '1', 'NX', 'EX', 86400);
|
|
if (!seen) return; // already handled
|
|
await sendEmail(event);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Dead-letter handling
|
|
```typescript
|
|
await consumer.run({
|
|
eachMessage: async ({ message }) => {
|
|
try {
|
|
await handle(message);
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
await producer.send({
|
|
topic: 'orders.placed.dlq',
|
|
messages: [{ value: message.value, headers: { error: err.message } }],
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### CloudEvents envelope
|
|
```typescript
|
|
const cloudEvent = {
|
|
specversion: '1.0',
|
|
type: 'com.example.order.placed',
|
|
source: '/orders',
|
|
id: crypto.randomUUID(),
|
|
time: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
data: { orderId, userId, amount },
|
|
};
|
|
await producer.send({ topic: 'orders.placed', messages: [{ value: JSON.stringify(cloudEvent) }] });
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Webhook fan-out
|
|
```typescript
|
|
app.post('/webhooks/payment', async (req, res) => {
|
|
await eventBus.publish('payment.captured', req.body);
|
|
res.status(202).end();
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 매 결정 기준
|
|
| 상황 | Approach |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 1:1 event → action, stateless | SEP |
|
|
| Stream aggregation (window sums) | ESP (Flink) |
|
|
| Pattern detect (A then B within 5s) | CEP (Esper) |
|
|
| Cross-system fan-out | SEP via EventBridge/Kafka |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: Kafka or EventBridge + idempotent stateless handlers.
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 부모: [[Event-Driven-Architecture]]
|
|
- 변형: [[Event-Stream-Processing]]
|
|
- 응용: [[Webhooks]] · [[Pub-Sub]] · [[Event-Sourcing]]
|
|
- Adjacent: [[CQRS]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: stateless 1:1 event handling — webhook, notification, simple workflow trigger.
|
|
**언제 X**: pattern correlation 필요 — CEP / ESP 사용.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Stateful SEP**: 매 cross-event state 가지면 ESP 로 reframe.
|
|
- **No idempotency**: at-least-once delivery 에서 매 duplicate side-effect.
|
|
- **Synchronous webhook chain**: 매 cascading failure — async queue 사이로.
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Hohpe Enterprise Integration Patterns, Confluent docs, AWS EventBridge guide).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — SEP vs ESP vs CEP, Kafka/EventBridge/NATS patterns |
|