f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
205 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
205 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-message-queues-and-event-streams
|
|
title: Message Queues and Event Streams
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [Queue vs Stream, MQ vs Streaming]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.9
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [messaging, queues, streams, kafka, sqs]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: multi
|
|
framework: kafka-sqs-rabbitmq
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Message Queues and Event Streams
|
|
|
|
## 매 한 줄
|
|
> **"매 Queue 는 work 를 distribute, 매 Stream 은 history 를 record."**. Queue 와 stream 은 매 둘 다 producer-consumer 를 decouple 하지만 매 mental model 이 다르다 — 매 queue 는 "처리할 일" (소비 후 사라짐), 매 stream 은 "발생한 사건" (immutable log, 매 replay 가능). 매 modern system 은 둘을 매 함께 사용.
|
|
|
|
## 매 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 Queue 의 본질
|
|
- **Consume = delete** (또는 ack 후 hidden).
|
|
- 매 1 message → 매 1 worker (work distribution).
|
|
- 매 short retention (ack 후 사라짐).
|
|
- 매 Examples: SQS, RabbitMQ classic, Redis list (BRPOP).
|
|
|
|
### 매 Stream 의 본질
|
|
- **Append-only immutable log**.
|
|
- 매 모든 consumer 가 매 모든 event 읽음 (각자 offset).
|
|
- 매 long retention (days~weeks~forever).
|
|
- 매 replay 가능.
|
|
- 매 Examples: Kafka, Kinesis, Pulsar, Redis Streams.
|
|
|
|
### 매 비교
|
|
| 측면 | Queue | Stream |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Consume | destructive | non-destructive |
|
|
| Retention | 짧음 (ack 후) | 긺 (time/size 기반) |
|
|
| Replay | X | O |
|
|
| Ordering | 약함 (per-queue) | 강함 (per-partition) |
|
|
| Throughput | 중 | 매 high (millions/sec) |
|
|
| Use case | task distribution | event sourcing, analytics, ML |
|
|
|
|
### 매 함께 쓰기
|
|
- 매 Stream → consumer 가 매 work item 추출 → 매 Queue 에 push (workflow orchestration).
|
|
- 매 Queue 에서 매 ack 후 매 audit event 를 매 stream 에 publish.
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴
|
|
|
|
### Queue: SQS worker (Node.js)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
import { SQSClient, ReceiveMessageCommand, DeleteMessageCommand } from '@aws-sdk/client-sqs';
|
|
|
|
const sqs = new SQSClient({});
|
|
const QueueUrl = process.env.QUEUE_URL;
|
|
|
|
while (true) {
|
|
const { Messages } = await sqs.send(new ReceiveMessageCommand({
|
|
QueueUrl,
|
|
MaxNumberOfMessages: 10,
|
|
WaitTimeSeconds: 20, // long polling
|
|
VisibilityTimeout: 60,
|
|
}));
|
|
if (!Messages) continue;
|
|
|
|
for (const msg of Messages) {
|
|
try {
|
|
await processJob(JSON.parse(msg.Body));
|
|
await sqs.send(new DeleteMessageCommand({ QueueUrl, ReceiptHandle: msg.ReceiptHandle }));
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
// Don't delete → message becomes visible again after VisibilityTimeout → retry → DLQ after maxReceiveCount
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Stream: Kafka consumer with offset (Node.js)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
import { Kafka } from 'kafkajs';
|
|
|
|
const consumer = new Kafka({ brokers: ['kafka:9092'] }).consumer({
|
|
groupId: 'analytics-v2',
|
|
});
|
|
await consumer.subscribe({ topic: 'user-events', fromBeginning: true });
|
|
// fromBeginning: true → re-read entire history (replay)
|
|
|
|
await consumer.run({
|
|
eachMessage: async ({ topic, partition, message }) => {
|
|
const event = JSON.parse(message.value.toString());
|
|
await projectIntoDB(event);
|
|
// Offset auto-committed (or manual via heartbeat)
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Stream: replay from specific offset
|
|
```javascript
|
|
// Reset consumer group to specific offset (admin operation)
|
|
import { Kafka } from 'kafkajs';
|
|
const admin = new Kafka({ brokers: ['kafka:9092'] }).admin();
|
|
await admin.connect();
|
|
await admin.resetOffsets({
|
|
groupId: 'analytics-v2',
|
|
topic: 'user-events',
|
|
earliest: true, // or specific offset / timestamp
|
|
});
|
|
// Next consumer.run() will re-read from beginning
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Redis Streams (XADD / XREADGROUP)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
import Redis from 'ioredis';
|
|
const redis = new Redis();
|
|
|
|
// Producer
|
|
await redis.xadd('events', '*', 'type', 'order.created', 'data', JSON.stringify(order));
|
|
|
|
// Consumer group
|
|
await redis.xgroup('CREATE', 'events', 'workers', '$', 'MKSTREAM').catch(() => {});
|
|
|
|
// Consume
|
|
while (true) {
|
|
const res = await redis.xreadgroup(
|
|
'GROUP', 'workers', 'worker-1',
|
|
'COUNT', 10, 'BLOCK', 5000,
|
|
'STREAMS', 'events', '>'
|
|
);
|
|
if (!res) continue;
|
|
for (const [, entries] of res) {
|
|
for (const [id, fields] of entries) {
|
|
await process(fields);
|
|
await redis.xack('events', 'workers', id);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Outbox → Stream (CDC pattern)
|
|
```yaml
|
|
# Debezium reads DB WAL → publishes to Kafka topic
|
|
# → other services subscribe to data changes without polling
|
|
connector: debezium-postgres
|
|
config:
|
|
database.hostname: db
|
|
database.dbname: orders
|
|
table.include.list: public.orders, public.outbox
|
|
topic.prefix: cdc
|
|
# → cdc.public.orders, cdc.public.outbox topics created
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Choice: 매 task vs event
|
|
```
|
|
Q1: "결과를 매 누가 처리하면 끝나나?" → Queue (1 worker)
|
|
Q2: "여러 service 가 매 동일 event 에 react?" → Stream (fan-out)
|
|
Q3: "역사를 replay 해야?" → Stream
|
|
Q4: "Order 가 strict (per-key)?" → Stream (partition by key)
|
|
Q5: "단순 background job?" → Queue
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 매 결정 기준
|
|
| 요구 | 선택 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Background job (이메일, 썸네일) | Queue (SQS, BullMQ) |
|
|
| Event sourcing / CDC | Stream (Kafka) |
|
|
| Real-time analytics | Stream (Kafka, Kinesis) |
|
|
| 매 strict ordering per user | Stream + partition key |
|
|
| Pub/Sub broadcast | Stream 또는 Pub/Sub |
|
|
| Workflow orchestration | Queue + worker (Temporal, Step Functions) |
|
|
| 매 audit log | Stream (immutable retention) |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: 매 task 면 queue, 매 event 면 stream. 매 둘 다 필요하면 매 함께 사용.
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 부모: [[Message Broker]] · [[Distributed Systems]]
|
|
- 변형: [[Kafka]] · [[SQS]]
|
|
- 응용: [[Event Sourcing]] · [[CQRS]] · [[CDC]]
|
|
- Adjacent: [[Dead Letter Queue]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: messaging architecture 결정, queue vs stream 선택, replay 요구사항 평가.
|
|
**언제 X**: 매 simple sync RPC 로 충분한 매 internal call.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Stream 을 queue 로**: 매 short retention 만 쓰면 매 stream 의 강점 (replay) 못 살림.
|
|
- **Queue 로 broadcast**: 매 fan-out 에 queue → 매 consumer 마다 별도 queue 만들어야 → 매 stream 이 정답.
|
|
- **Partition key 무시**: 매 stream 에서 매 ordering 필요한데 매 random key → 매 race condition.
|
|
- **Retention infinity**: 매 cost 폭주 — 매 compaction / time-based 설정.
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Kafka docs, AWS SQS/Kinesis docs, Confluent blog, Martin Kleppmann "DDIA" Ch 11).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — queue vs stream 비교 + SQS/Kafka/Redis Streams 패턴 |
|