f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
178 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
178 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: wiki-2026-0508-ring-attention
|
||
title: Ring Attention
|
||
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
||
status: verified
|
||
canonical_id: self
|
||
aliases: [Ring Self-Attention, Distributed Attention]
|
||
duplicate_of: none
|
||
source_trust_level: A
|
||
confidence_score: 0.95
|
||
verification_status: applied
|
||
tags: [attention, long-context, distributed-training, transformer, systems]
|
||
raw_sources: []
|
||
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
||
github_commit: pending
|
||
tech_stack:
|
||
language: Python
|
||
framework: JAX/PyTorch/CUDA
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Ring Attention
|
||
|
||
## 매 한 줄
|
||
> **"매 attention 의 sequence 의 N 의 device 의 ring 의 split — context length scales linearly with devices."**. Liu, Zaharia, Abbeel 2023 ("Ring Attention with Blockwise Transformers") 의 propose, 매 1M+ context window (Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude Opus 4.7 1M) 의 training-time enabler 의, 매 communication overlap with compute 의 near-zero overhead.
|
||
|
||
## 매 핵심
|
||
|
||
### 매 핵심 idea
|
||
- Sequence 의 N device 의 split (each device holds 1/N tokens of Q, K, V).
|
||
- Each device computes attention with its local Q against rotating K, V blocks.
|
||
- K, V blocks travel ring N steps; communication 의 attention compute 와 overlap.
|
||
- Result: full sequence attention 의 device 의 N 배 의 longer context 의 fit.
|
||
|
||
### 매 vs alternatives
|
||
- **Flash Attention**: single device, IO-aware, memory-efficient. Ring composes on top.
|
||
- **Sequence Parallel (Megatron)**: similar split but layernorm/dropout only.
|
||
- **Context Parallel (Megatron 2024)**: industrial Ring Attention variant.
|
||
- **Striped Attention** (2023): improved load balance for causal masks.
|
||
|
||
### 매 응용
|
||
1. 1M+ context LLM training (Gemini 1.5/2.0, Claude Opus 4.x).
|
||
2. Long video understanding.
|
||
3. Whole-codebase code models.
|
||
4. Long DNA sequence models (Evo).
|
||
|
||
## 💻 패턴
|
||
|
||
### Conceptual Ring Loop (single block)
|
||
```python
|
||
import torch
|
||
import torch.distributed as dist
|
||
|
||
def ring_attention_step(q_local, kv_local, world_size):
|
||
"""매 simplified single-pass illustration."""
|
||
out = torch.zeros_like(q_local)
|
||
lse = torch.full(q_local.shape[:-1], -float("inf"), device=q_local.device)
|
||
|
||
k, v = kv_local
|
||
rank = dist.get_rank()
|
||
|
||
for step in range(world_size):
|
||
# local attention partial
|
||
partial_out, partial_lse = blockwise_attention(q_local, k, v)
|
||
out, lse = online_softmax_merge(out, lse, partial_out, partial_lse)
|
||
|
||
# rotate K, V to next neighbor (overlap with next compute)
|
||
send_rank = (rank - 1) % world_size
|
||
recv_rank = (rank + 1) % world_size
|
||
k, v = ring_send_recv(k, v, send_rank, recv_rank)
|
||
return out
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Online Softmax Merge
|
||
```python
|
||
def online_softmax_merge(out_a, lse_a, out_b, lse_b):
|
||
"""매 numerically stable merge of 2 partial attention results."""
|
||
m = torch.maximum(lse_a, lse_b)
|
||
c_a = torch.exp(lse_a - m).unsqueeze(-1)
|
||
c_b = torch.exp(lse_b - m).unsqueeze(-1)
|
||
out = (c_a * out_a + c_b * out_b) / (c_a + c_b)
|
||
new_lse = m + torch.log(torch.exp(lse_a - m) + torch.exp(lse_b - m))
|
||
return out, new_lse
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Ring Send/Recv (NCCL)
|
||
```python
|
||
def ring_send_recv(k, v, send_rank, recv_rank):
|
||
k_buf = torch.empty_like(k)
|
||
v_buf = torch.empty_like(v)
|
||
reqs = [
|
||
dist.isend(k, send_rank), dist.isend(v, send_rank),
|
||
dist.irecv(k_buf, recv_rank), dist.irecv(v_buf, recv_rank),
|
||
]
|
||
for r in reqs: r.wait()
|
||
return k_buf, v_buf
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Striped (Causal-aware) Block Order
|
||
```python
|
||
def striped_block_order(seq_len, world_size, block_size):
|
||
"""매 causal mask 의 load balance 의 — interleave 의 X stride."""
|
||
n_blocks = seq_len // block_size
|
||
return [(i * world_size + r) % n_blocks
|
||
for r in range(world_size)
|
||
for i in range(n_blocks // world_size)]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Causal Mask Skip Optimization
|
||
```python
|
||
def should_compute(q_block_idx, kv_block_idx, causal=True):
|
||
"""매 causal: skip 의 kv > q (future)."""
|
||
return (not causal) or kv_block_idx <= q_block_idx
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Compute/Comm Overlap (CUDA streams)
|
||
```python
|
||
def overlapped_step(q, k, v, next_kv_handles, compute_stream, comm_stream):
|
||
with torch.cuda.stream(compute_stream):
|
||
partial = blockwise_attention(q, k, v)
|
||
with torch.cuda.stream(comm_stream):
|
||
next_k, next_v = ring_send_recv(k, v, ...)
|
||
torch.cuda.synchronize()
|
||
return partial, next_k, next_v
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### JAX Ring Attention (high-level)
|
||
```python
|
||
import jax
|
||
from jax.experimental.shard_map import shard_map
|
||
from jax.sharding import PartitionSpec as P
|
||
|
||
@jax.jit
|
||
def ring_attn_pjit(q, k, v, mesh):
|
||
return shard_map(
|
||
ring_attention_fn,
|
||
mesh=mesh,
|
||
in_specs=(P("seq", None), P("seq", None), P("seq", None)),
|
||
out_specs=P("seq", None),
|
||
)(q, k, v)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 매 결정 기준
|
||
| 상황 | Approach |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| <32K context, single GPU | Flash Attention 3 only |
|
||
| 32K–256K context, single node | Flash Attention + sequence parallel |
|
||
| 256K–10M context, multi-node | Ring Attention (Striped variant) |
|
||
| Causal model | Striped Ring Attention (load balance) |
|
||
| TPU pod | JAX shard_map + Ring |
|
||
|
||
**기본값**: Striped Ring Attention with online softmax + NCCL ring + Flash Attention kernel as inner block.
|
||
|
||
## 🔗 Graph
|
||
- 부모: [[Transformer_Architecture_and_LLM_Foundations|Attention Mechanism]] · [[Distributed Training]]
|
||
- 응용: [[Gemini]]
|
||
- Adjacent: [[Flash Attention]] · [[Online Softmax]]
|
||
|
||
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
||
**언제**: 매 long-context model 의 train/serve 의 evaluating, infra design 의 시.
|
||
**언제 X**: 매 inference-only at small context 의 X — Flash Attention 만 의 sufficient.
|
||
|
||
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
||
- **Naive ring without overlap**: communication 의 sequential 의 → no speedup.
|
||
- **Causal mask ignored**: 매 lower-triangle 의 50% compute 의 wasted 의 X — striped order 의 fix.
|
||
- **Float32 accumulation skipped**: long context 의 numerical drift — fp32 LSE 의 keep.
|
||
- **Pure data parallel for long context**: memory-bound — Ring or context parallel 의 use.
|
||
- **Block size 의 cache 의 fit X**: bandwidth-bound — tune block_size to L2.
|
||
|
||
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
||
- Verified (Liu et al. 2023 arXiv:2310.01889; Megatron-LM Context Parallelism docs 2024).
|
||
- 신뢰도 A.
|
||
|
||
## 🕓 Changelog
|
||
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
||
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — Ring Attention algo + Striped variant + JAX/PyTorch patterns |
|