f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
229 lines
6.7 KiB
Markdown
229 lines
6.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: wiki-2026-0508-imbalanced-data-handling
|
|
title: Imbalanced Data Handling
|
|
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
|
status: verified
|
|
canonical_id: self
|
|
aliases: [imbalanced data, class imbalance, SMOTE, oversampling, undersampling, class weight]
|
|
duplicate_of: none
|
|
source_trust_level: A
|
|
confidence_score: 0.95
|
|
verification_status: applied
|
|
tags: [machine-learning, imbalanced, smote, oversampling, class-weight, fraud]
|
|
raw_sources: []
|
|
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
|
github_commit: pending
|
|
tech_stack:
|
|
language: Python
|
|
framework: imbalanced-learn / scikit-learn
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Imbalanced Data Handling
|
|
|
|
## 매 한 줄
|
|
> **"매 class distribution 의 의 의 imbalance — 매 majority dominate"**. 매 fraud, 매 medical rare disease, 매 anomaly 의 common. 매 method: 매 oversample (SMOTE), undersample, class weight, focal loss, threshold tune. 매 evaluation: 매 accuracy 의 useless — PR-AUC, F1, MCC.
|
|
|
|
## 매 핵심
|
|
|
|
### 매 method
|
|
- **Resampling**:
|
|
- **Random oversample** (minority).
|
|
- **SMOTE**: 매 synthetic minority.
|
|
- **ADASYN**: adaptive.
|
|
- **Random undersample** (majority).
|
|
- **Tomek links**: 매 boundary clean.
|
|
- **Class weight**.
|
|
- **Loss-based**: focal loss, weighted CE.
|
|
- **Threshold tuning**: 매 default 0.5 의 X.
|
|
- **Anomaly detection** (1-class).
|
|
- **Cost-sensitive learning**.
|
|
|
|
### 매 metric
|
|
- **PR-AUC** (Average Precision).
|
|
- **F1** / Macro-F1.
|
|
- **MCC** (Matthews Correlation Coefficient).
|
|
- **Cohen's κ**.
|
|
- **Confusion matrix**.
|
|
|
|
### 매 응용
|
|
1. **Fraud detection**.
|
|
2. **Medical** (rare disease).
|
|
3. **Anomaly detection**.
|
|
4. **Customer churn**.
|
|
5. **Click prediction**.
|
|
|
|
## 💻 패턴
|
|
|
|
### Class weight (sklearn)
|
|
```python
|
|
from sklearn.utils import class_weight
|
|
weights = class_weight.compute_class_weight('balanced', classes=np.unique(y), y=y)
|
|
weight_dict = dict(zip(np.unique(y), weights))
|
|
|
|
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
|
|
model = LogisticRegression(class_weight=weight_dict).fit(X, y)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### SMOTE (imbalanced-learn)
|
|
```python
|
|
from imblearn.over_sampling import SMOTE
|
|
sm = SMOTE(random_state=0)
|
|
X_res, y_res = sm.fit_resample(X, y)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### SMOTE-NC (mixed numerical + categorical)
|
|
```python
|
|
from imblearn.over_sampling import SMOTENC
|
|
smnc = SMOTENC(categorical_features=[0, 2, 5], random_state=0)
|
|
X_res, y_res = smnc.fit_resample(X, y)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Random undersample
|
|
```python
|
|
from imblearn.under_sampling import RandomUnderSampler
|
|
rus = RandomUnderSampler(sampling_strategy=0.5, random_state=0)
|
|
X_res, y_res = rus.fit_resample(X, y)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Combined (SMOTE + Tomek)
|
|
```python
|
|
from imblearn.combine import SMOTETomek
|
|
smt = SMOTETomek(random_state=0)
|
|
X_res, y_res = smt.fit_resample(X, y)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pipeline (avoid leakage)
|
|
```python
|
|
from imblearn.pipeline import Pipeline as ImbPipeline
|
|
pipe = ImbPipeline([
|
|
('scaler', StandardScaler()),
|
|
('smote', SMOTE()),
|
|
('clf', LogisticRegression()),
|
|
])
|
|
# 매 SMOTE applied 매 매 fold (CV-safe)
|
|
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
|
|
scores = cross_val_score(pipe, X, y, cv=5, scoring='f1')
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Focal loss (PyTorch)
|
|
```python
|
|
import torch.nn.functional as F
|
|
def focal_loss(logits, targets, alpha=0.25, gamma=2.0):
|
|
p = torch.sigmoid(logits)
|
|
p_t = p * targets + (1 - p) * (1 - targets)
|
|
alpha_t = alpha * targets + (1 - alpha) * (1 - targets)
|
|
bce = F.binary_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits, targets, reduction='none')
|
|
return (alpha_t * (1 - p_t) ** gamma * bce).mean()
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Threshold tuning
|
|
```python
|
|
from sklearn.metrics import precision_recall_curve
|
|
y_score = model.predict_proba(X_val)[:, 1]
|
|
prec, rec, thr = precision_recall_curve(y_val, y_score)
|
|
f1_scores = 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec + 1e-9)
|
|
best_thr = thr[f1_scores.argmax()]
|
|
y_pred = (y_score > best_thr).astype(int)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### XGBoost scale_pos_weight
|
|
```python
|
|
import xgboost as xgb
|
|
ratio = sum(y == 0) / sum(y == 1)
|
|
model = xgb.XGBClassifier(scale_pos_weight=ratio).fit(X, y)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Eval metrics (proper)
|
|
```python
|
|
from sklearn.metrics import classification_report, average_precision_score, matthews_corrcoef, confusion_matrix
|
|
print(classification_report(y_val, y_pred))
|
|
print(f'PR-AUC: {average_precision_score(y_val, y_score):.3f}')
|
|
print(f'MCC: {matthews_corrcoef(y_val, y_pred):.3f}')
|
|
print(confusion_matrix(y_val, y_pred))
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Cost-sensitive learning
|
|
```python
|
|
COST_MATRIX = np.array([[0, 1], [10, 0]]) # 매 FN cost = 10x FP
|
|
|
|
def cost_sensitive_predict(probs, cost):
|
|
expected_cost = probs @ cost
|
|
return expected_cost.argmin(axis=1)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### One-class anomaly
|
|
```python
|
|
from sklearn.ensemble import IsolationForest
|
|
iso = IsolationForest(contamination=0.01).fit(X_majority)
|
|
anomalies = iso.predict(X_test) == -1
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Weighted sampler (PyTorch)
|
|
```python
|
|
from torch.utils.data import WeightedRandomSampler
|
|
class_counts = [sum(y == c) for c in np.unique(y)]
|
|
weights = [1.0 / class_counts[label] for label in y]
|
|
sampler = WeightedRandomSampler(weights, num_samples=len(y), replacement=True)
|
|
loader = DataLoader(dataset, batch_size=32, sampler=sampler)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Stratified split
|
|
```python
|
|
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold
|
|
skf = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=0)
|
|
for train_idx, val_idx in skf.split(X, y):
|
|
train_fold(X[train_idx], y[train_idx])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Borderline-SMOTE
|
|
```python
|
|
from imblearn.over_sampling import BorderlineSMOTE
|
|
bsm = BorderlineSMOTE(random_state=0)
|
|
X_res, y_res = bsm.fit_resample(X, y)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Calibration check after handling
|
|
```python
|
|
from sklearn.calibration import calibration_curve
|
|
prob_true, prob_pred = calibration_curve(y_val, y_score, n_bins=10)
|
|
# 매 oversampling 매 의 의 calibration 의 distort
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 매 결정 기준
|
|
| 상황 | Approach |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Mild (< 1:10) | Class weight |
|
|
| Moderate (1:10-1:100) | SMOTE / class weight |
|
|
| Severe (> 1:100) | Anomaly detection / focal |
|
|
| Tabular | XGBoost scale_pos_weight |
|
|
| DL | Focal loss + weighted sampler |
|
|
| Cost varies | Cost-sensitive |
|
|
|
|
**기본값**: 매 class weight + 매 threshold tune + 매 PR-AUC eval. 매 severe = focal + anomaly detection 의 explore. 매 SMOTE 는 careful (calibration distort).
|
|
|
|
## 🔗 Graph
|
|
- 부모: [[Machine-Learning]] · [[Data-Preprocessing]]
|
|
- 변형: [[SMOTE]] · [[Focal-Loss]]
|
|
- 응용: [[Anomaly-Detection]]
|
|
|
|
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
|
**언제**: 매 fraud / medical / churn / anomaly.
|
|
**언제 X**: 매 balanced.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
|
- **Accuracy metric on imbalanced**: 매 misleading.
|
|
- **SMOTE before train/val split**: 매 leakage.
|
|
- **No threshold tune**: 매 default 0.5 의 wrong.
|
|
- **Aggressive oversample**: 매 calibration 의 break.
|
|
- **Ignore minority cost**: 매 FN expensive.
|
|
|
|
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
|
- Verified (Chawla SMOTE 2002, He & Garcia review 2009, Lin focal 2017).
|
|
- 신뢰도 A.
|
|
|
|
## 🕓 Changelog
|
|
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
|
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — methods + 매 SMOTE / focal / threshold / scale_pos_weight code |
|