2.1 KiB
2.1 KiB
Project Timeline
2026-05-02
- Discussed adding a sidebar Designer menu for a Project Chronicle Guard system.
- Decided the feature should behave like an independent record layer, similar in spirit to the existing agent/team-style selector.
- Chose an incremental MVP path: first add project record management and Markdown generation, then later expand automatic analysis and richer workflows.
- Completed Stage 1: independent Project Chronicle module, Designer project selector, and explicit planning/development/bug writers.
- Completed Stage 2: added discussion, decision, and retrospective record writers with a scalable record type selector.
- Completed Stage 3: added Chronicle Guard mode to inject active Designer project context into agent prompts.
- Completed Stage 4: added a generated record browser and open action for Chronicle Markdown files.
- Completed Stage 5: added
chronicle.config.jsonas a portable project record configuration file. - Improved Chronicle Guard after user testing: default guard context, stricter project/record checks, question reasons, MVP-first guidance, candidate record output, and tests.
- Added Second Brain Trace Mode so users can verify whether active Brain notes were searched, referenced, and reflected in answers.
- Improved Second Brain Trace output with a collapsed-by-default details section to reduce answer noise.
- Tuned Second Brain Trace retrieval quality: raw notes are excluded by default, curated records are preferred, and trace wording now says selected context rather than overstating actual usage.
- Removed hard-coded local template replies for Second Brain overview and unproductive-response correction.
- Added progressive answer format guidance: short conclusion first, brief summary second, detailed answer third.
- Added No Evidence, No Project Claim rules and Second Brain source type classification to prevent general notes from being treated as project implementation evidence.
- Added project claim policy enforcement so main answers must treat general-only or mixed evidence as cautious and avoid unsupported technical structure claims.