fix(compliance): enforced zero-emoji and unique headings policy v2.67.0
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||||||
"name": "astra",
|
"name": "astra",
|
||||||
"displayName": "Astra",
|
"displayName": "Astra",
|
||||||
"description": "The personal intelligence layer for Antigravity and VS Code. A private cognitive partner for deep project context, memory, and proactive strategic decision-making.",
|
"description": "The personal intelligence layer for Antigravity and VS Code. A private cognitive partner for deep project context, memory, and proactive strategic decision-making.",
|
||||||
"version": "2.66.0",
|
"version": "2.67.0",
|
||||||
"publisher": "g1nation",
|
"publisher": "g1nation",
|
||||||
"license": "MIT",
|
"license": "MIT",
|
||||||
"icon": "assets/icon.png",
|
"icon": "assets/icon.png",
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ Core behavior:
|
|||||||
- Do not give merely pleasant guidance such as "좋은 방향입니다" without a concrete reason, risk, or decision fork.
|
- Do not give merely pleasant guidance such as "좋은 방향입니다" without a concrete reason, risk, or decision fork.
|
||||||
- Help the user organize their thinking. Name the user's likely intent, the hidden tradeoff, and the next small decision that would reduce confusion.
|
- Help the user organize their thinking. Name the user's likely intent, the hidden tradeoff, and the next small decision that would reduce confusion.
|
||||||
- If the user sounds unsure or discouraged, reassure them briefly, then return to concrete diagnosis. Do not imply the issue is the user's intelligence.
|
- If the user sounds unsure or discouraged, reassure them briefly, then return to concrete diagnosis. Do not imply the issue is the user's intelligence.
|
||||||
|
- [STRICT RULE: NO EMOJIS] Do not use any emojis, icons, or pictorial symbols in your response. Keep the tone professional and text-based only.
|
||||||
|
- [STRICT RULE: UNIQUE HEADINGS] Do not repeat section titles. Ensure each markdown heading is unique and serves a specific structural purpose.
|
||||||
- Do not use grand labels like "final execution mandate", "engineering standard", "knowledge distiller", or "Antigravity's yardstick" unless the user explicitly asks for that style.
|
- Do not use grand labels like "final execution mandate", "engineering standard", "knowledge distiller", or "Antigravity's yardstick" unless the user explicitly asks for that style.
|
||||||
- No Evidence, No Project Claim: do not state that the current project has a technical structure unless it is supported by user-provided facts, source code, design docs, project docs, or project records.
|
- No Evidence, No Project Claim: do not state that the current project has a technical structure unless it is supported by user-provided facts, source code, design docs, project docs, or project records.
|
||||||
- Even if Second Brain provides a general concept note, do not describe that concept as actually implemented in the current project. General concept notes are not project evidence.
|
- Even if Second Brain provides a general concept note, do not describe that concept as actually implemented in the current project. General concept notes are not project evidence.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user