9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
5.2 KiB
5.2 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-command-center | Command Center | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Command Center
매 한 줄
"매 Command Center 매 cross-system situational awareness 의 single pane". 매 NASA Mission Control 의 origin 매 modern SRE NOC, AWS-style war-room 의 조상. 2026 매 LLM-assisted incident commander (Claude Opus 4.7) 의 augment 의 standard.
매 핵심
매 구성
- Big-board screens: 매 service health, traffic, error budget, deploy state.
- Roles: Incident Commander (IC), Comms lead, Scribe, SMEs.
- Comms channels: 매 dedicated Slack/Teams + voice bridge.
- Runbooks: 매 indexed, searchable, version-controlled.
- Decision log: 매 incident timestamp + decision + reasoning.
매 incident phases
- Detect — 매 alert / customer report.
- Triage — 매 severity classification (sev1 ~ sev5).
- Mitigate — 매 immediate impact reduction.
- Resolve — 매 root-cause fix.
- Postmortem — 매 blameless review + action items.
매 응용
- Sev1 게임 day quarterly 매 muscle-memory 유지.
- Single-pane dashboard 의 SLO + error budget + on-call status.
- Incident bot 의 channel-create + role-assign + scribe-prompt 자동화.
💻 패턴
Incident channel bot
// incident-bot.ts
async function createIncident(severity: 1 | 2 | 3) {
const channel = await slack.conversations.create({
name: `inc-${dayjs().format('YYYYMMDD-HHmm')}-sev${severity}`,
});
await pagerduty.createIncident({ severity });
await postRunbookLink(channel.id);
await assignRoles(channel.id, { ic: oncall(), scribe: backup() });
return channel;
}
Big-board layout (Grafana)
# dashboard.yml
panels:
- row: top
items: [global_qps, global_error_rate, p99_latency, saturation]
- row: middle
items: [api_health, db_health, cache_health, queue_depth]
- row: bottom
items: [deploy_state, on_call_roster, error_budget_burn]
Severity matrix
# severity.py
def classify(impact_users: int, impact_revenue_per_hr: float, data_loss: bool) -> int:
if data_loss or impact_revenue_per_hr > 100_000: return 1
if impact_users > 10_000: return 2
if impact_users > 100: return 3
return 4
Incident decision log (markdown)
# inc-2026-0510-1432-sev1
| Time | Actor | Decision | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14:32 | IC | Page DB on-call | DB cpu 100% 5m |
| 14:38 | DB-SME | Failover replica | Primary unresponsive |
| 14:41 | IC | Status page yellow | Degraded checkout |
LLM-assisted incident summary
# llm_summary.py
prompt = f"""
You are an SRE assistant. Summarize this incident channel transcript:
- Timeline (5 bullets max)
- Root cause hypothesis
- Customer impact
- Followups
Transcript: {channel_transcript}
"""
summary = anthropic.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-7",
max_tokens=2000,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
)
Runbook structure
# runbook: api-5xx-spike
## Detect: alert "api-5xx > 1% 5m"
## Mitigate
1. Check deploy in last 30m → rollback: `kubectl rollout undo deploy/api`
2. Check DB connections → scale pool: `kubectl scale ...`
## Verify
- Error rate <0.1% for 10m
## Escalate to
- @api-team if 30m without recovery
Postmortem template
## Summary
## Timeline (UTC)
## Root cause
## Impact (users, $, duration)
## What went well
## What didn't
## Action items (DRI, due date)
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Sev1 (data loss / outage) | Full war room + exec comms + status page red |
| Sev2 (degraded) | IC + 1 SME + status yellow |
| Sev3 (minor) | On-call solo + ticket |
| Recurring sev3 | Promote to project, root-cause |
| Multi-org incident | Joint war room + shared scribe |
기본값: clear-roles + decision-log + blameless-postmortem.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Site Reliability Engineering
- 변형: War Room
- 응용: Observability · On-Call
- Adjacent: Postmortem · Runbook
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 incident channel transcript 의 summarization, 매 timeline reconstruction, 매 postmortem 의 first-draft. 언제 X: 매 critical mitigation decision — 매 human IC 의 final call. LLM 매 advisor only.
❌ 안티패턴
- Hero culture: 매 single SRE 의 24/7 매 burnout + bus-factor 1.
- Blame-game postmortem: 매 culture 의 silence 야기.
- Runbook rot: 매 6-month-old runbook 매 broken commands.
- Dashboard bloat: 매 100+ panel 매 signal/noise 1:50.
- Status page lag: 매 customer 가 first 알림 — 매 trust 손실.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Google SRE Workbook Ch.9, PagerDuty Incident Response Documentation 2025, Atlassian Incident Management Handbook).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — incident phases, severity matrix, runbook, anti-patterns |