9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
6.1 KiB
6.1 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-secure-multi-party-computation | Secure Multi-party Computation | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.88 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Secure Multi-party Computation
매 한 줄
"매 N parties 가 jointly compute f(x1, ..., xN) without revealing inputs". Yao 1982 garbled circuits → BGW 1988 secret sharing → modern SPDZ, ABY3, CrypTen for privacy-preserving ML. 매 2026 production: Apple PCC (Private Cloud Compute), Meta CrypTen, Google federated analytics.
매 핵심
매 Primitives
- Secret sharing (Shamir): 매 split secret into N shares, t+1 reconstruct.
- Garbled circuits (Yao): 매 2-party Boolean circuit evaluation.
- Homomorphic encryption (FHE/PHE): 매 compute on ciphertext.
- Oblivious Transfer (OT): 매 sender sends 1 of 2, receiver picks without revealing.
매 Threat models
- Semi-honest (passive): 매 follow protocol but try to learn.
- Malicious (active): 매 deviate arbitrarily — 매 needs MAC/zero-knowledge.
- Covert: 매 cheat detected with high probability.
매 Modern frameworks
- CrypTen (Meta): PyTorch-style MPC for ML.
- MP-SPDZ: 매 wide protocol library.
- TF-Encrypted: TensorFlow MPC.
- Concrete (Zama): TFHE for ML inference.
매 응용
- Privacy-preserving ML inference (medical, financial).
- Federated learning aggregation (secure aggregation).
- Private set intersection (ad measurement).
- Apple PCC: 매 trusted enclave + attestation for LLM.
💻 패턴
Shamir secret sharing
import random
from sympy import mod_inverse
PRIME = 2**127 - 1
def share(secret, n, t):
coeffs = [secret] + [random.randrange(PRIME) for _ in range(t-1)]
shares = []
for i in range(1, n+1):
y = sum(c * pow(i, j, PRIME) for j, c in enumerate(coeffs)) % PRIME
shares.append((i, y))
return shares
def reconstruct(shares):
secret = 0
for i, (xi, yi) in enumerate(shares):
num, den = 1, 1
for j, (xj, _) in enumerate(shares):
if i != j:
num = (num * -xj) % PRIME
den = (den * (xi - xj)) % PRIME
secret = (secret + yi * num * mod_inverse(den, PRIME)) % PRIME
return secret
CrypTen ML inference
import crypten
import torch
crypten.init()
# Two parties: server has model, client has input
@crypten.mpc.run_multiprocess(world_size=2)
def private_inference():
model = crypten.nn.from_pytorch(my_model, dummy_input)
model.encrypt(src=0) # server holds model
x_enc = crypten.cryptensor(client_input, src=1) # client input
y_enc = model(x_enc)
y = y_enc.get_plain_text() # decrypt result
return y
private_inference()
Secure aggregation (federated learning)
def secure_aggregate(client_updates, threshold):
# Each client masks update with random pad shared via DH
n = len(client_updates)
masks = [generate_pairwise_masks(i, n) for i in range(n)]
masked = [u + sum(masks[i]) for i, u in enumerate(client_updates)]
# Server sums — masks 매 cancel out
return sum(masked) # 매 individual updates 매 hidden
Garbled circuit (Yao 2PC)
def garble_AND():
# 매 circuit: z = x AND y
keys = {(b1, b2): random.randbytes(16) for b1 in [0,1] for b2 in [0,1]}
output_keys = {0: random.randbytes(16), 1: random.randbytes(16)}
table = []
for (b1, b2), k_in in keys.items():
z = b1 & b2
ct = aes_encrypt(k_in, output_keys[z])
table.append(ct)
random.shuffle(table)
return table, output_keys
TFHE inference (Zama Concrete)
from concrete import fhe
@fhe.compiler({"x": "encrypted"})
def relu(x):
return fhe.maxes(x, 0)
circuit = relu.compile([(i,) for i in range(-128, 128)])
encrypted = circuit.encrypt(-5)
result = circuit.run(encrypted)
print(circuit.decrypt(result)) # 0
Private set intersection
def psi_dh(a_set, b_set):
# Diffie-Hellman based PSI
a_secret, b_secret = random_scalar(), random_scalar()
A_blinded = [hash_to_curve(x) ** a_secret for x in a_set]
B_blinded = [hash_to_curve(y) ** b_secret for y in b_set]
A_double = [p ** b_secret for p in A_blinded]
B_double = [p ** a_secret for p in B_blinded]
return set(A_double) & set(B_double)
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| 2-party ML inference | 매 Garbled circuits 또는 CrypTen |
| N-party aggregation | 매 Secret sharing (BGW, SPDZ) |
| Single ciphertext compute | 매 FHE (Concrete, Microsoft SEAL) |
| Trusted hardware available | 매 TEE (SGX, Apple PCC) — 매 fastest |
| Production LLM privacy | 매 Apple PCC pattern (TEE + attestation) |
기본값: 매 ML inference 면 CrypTen (semi-honest 2PC), 매 production privacy LLM 면 TEE-based (Apple PCC).
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Practical-Cryptography · Privacy-Preserving ML
- 변형: Homomorphic Encryption (HE)
- 응용: Federated Learning
- Adjacent: Differential Privacy
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 multi-party data joint analysis, 매 client-side model with private data, 매 medical/financial cross-org compute. 언제 X: 매 single-party compute (DP 면 충분), 매 latency-critical (MPC 매 100-1000× slower).
❌ 안티패턴
- Semi-honest in production: 매 malicious adversary 가능 면 fail.
- MPC for everything: 매 100× overhead — TEE 가 better when available.
- Naive secret sharing: 매 multiplication 매 expensive (Beaver triples 필요).
- Ignoring side-channels: 매 timing/power leak — 매 protocol-only 매 부족.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Yao 1982, BGW 1988, Damgård SPDZ 2012, CrypTen 2020).
- Apple PCC technical paper 2024.
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — primitives, modern frameworks, Apple PCC 추가 |