Files
2nd/10_Wiki/Topic_Programming/AI_and_ML/Eudaimonia-and-Well-being.md
T
Antigravity Agent 9148c358d0 docs(10_Wiki): 위키 전체 재구성 — Topic_* 폴더를 4개 카테고리로 통합 + 대규모 중복 제거
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를
Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류.

- 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로
  자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거,
  동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거.
- 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming,
  Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business,
  Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로,
  나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는
  title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백).
  원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지.
- 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서.
- 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는
  지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지.
- Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경.
- 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
2026-07-05 00:33:48 +09:00

6.9 KiB
Raw Blame History

id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
id title category status canonical_id aliases duplicate_of source_trust_level confidence_score verification_status tags raw_sources last_reinforced github_commit tech_stack
wiki-2026-0508-eudaimonia-and-well-being Eudaimonia and Well-being 10_Wiki/Topics verified self
eudaimonia
well-being
hedonia
PERMA
flourishing
Ryff
none A 0.92 applied
philosophy
psychology
well-being
eudaimonia
flourishing
perma
positive-psychology
2026-05-10 pending
language applicable_to
Philosophy / Psychology
Coaching
Therapy
AI Tutor
Workplace

Eudaimonia and Well-being

매 한 줄

"매 hedonic (pleasure) 의 X — 매 flourishing". Aristotle 매 ethos. Ryff 6-factor, Seligman PERMA, Self-Determination Theory (SDT). 매 modern: 매 work, education, AI design 의 적용. 매 hedonic ≠ eudaimonic — 매 sustainable well-being.

매 핵심

매 hedonic vs eudaimonic

  • Hedonic: 매 pleasure, life satisfaction.
  • Eudaimonic: 매 meaning, growth, virtue.
  • Aristotle: 매 living virtuously.

매 framework

  • Ryff PWB (1989): 매 6 factors:
    1. Autonomy
    2. Environmental mastery
    3. Personal growth
    4. Positive relations
    5. Purpose in life
    6. Self-acceptance
  • PERMA (Seligman): P-ositive emotion, E-ngagement, R-elationships, M-eaning, A-chievement.
  • SDT (Deci & Ryan): 매 autonomy, competence, relatedness.
  • Flourishing scale (Diener).

매 응용

  1. Therapy: 매 positive psychology.
  2. Coaching: 매 strengths-based.
  3. Workplace: 매 meaningful work.
  4. Education: 매 character + growth.
  5. AI design: 매 long-term well-being > engagement metric.

매 measurement

  • PWB scale (42-item).
  • Flourishing scale (8-item).
  • WEMWBS (Warwick-Edinburgh).
  • Subjective Well-being (Diener SWLS).

💻 패턴

PERMA self-assessment

def perma_score(responses):
    """매 5 dimensions × 3 items × 0-10 scale."""
    return {
        'P': mean(responses.positive_emotion),
        'E': mean(responses.engagement),
        'R': mean(responses.relationships),
        'M': mean(responses.meaning),
        'A': mean(responses.achievement),
        'overall': mean([mean(getattr(responses, d)) for d in ['positive_emotion','engagement','relationships','meaning','achievement']]),
    }

SDT needs check

def sdt_needs_check(responses):
    needs = {
        'autonomy': mean(responses.autonomy_items),  # 매 0-7
        'competence': mean(responses.competence_items),
        'relatedness': mean(responses.relatedness_items),
    }
    # 매 < 4 = thwarted, > 5 = supported
    return {k: ('thwarted' if v < 4 else 'supported' if v > 5 else 'mixed') for k, v in needs.items()}

Daily reflection journal

def reflection_prompts():
    return [
        "What gave you a sense of purpose today?",
        "When did you feel most engaged?",
        "Who did you connect with meaningfully?",
        "What did you learn or grow in?",
        "What strength did you use?",
    ]

Strengths-based intervention (VIA)

VIA_STRENGTHS = ['curiosity', 'love_of_learning', 'judgment', 'creativity', 'perspective',
                  'bravery', 'persistence', 'integrity', 'vitality',
                  'love', 'kindness', 'social_intelligence',
                  'teamwork', 'fairness', 'leadership',
                  'forgiveness', 'humility', 'prudence', 'self_regulation',
                  'awe', 'gratitude', 'hope', 'humor', 'spirituality']

def use_signature_strength(top_strength):
    return {
        'curiosity': 'Explore something unfamiliar today',
        'gratitude': 'Write 3 things you are grateful for',
        'kindness': 'Do an unexpected kind act',
        # ...
    }.get(top_strength)

Meaning-making (logotherapy)

def meaning_pathways():
    """매 Frankl. 매 3 ways."""
    return {
        'creative': 'creating a work or doing a deed',
        'experiential': 'experiencing something or someone (love, beauty)',
        'attitudinal': 'attitude toward unavoidable suffering',
    }

Hedonic adaptation breaker

def break_adaptation(routine):
    """매 hedonic treadmill 의 변화."""
    return {
        'novelty': pick_new_path(routine),
        'savor': prolong_simple_pleasure(),
        'gratitude': appreciate_existing(),
        'social': share_experience(),
    }

AI well-being-aligned design

def well_being_score(user_session):
    """매 not engagement-only. 매 long-term well-being."""
    return {
        'time_well_spent': user_session.purposeful_minutes,
        'meaningful_connection': user_session.deep_chat_minutes,
        'rumination_avoided': 1 - user_session.doomscroll_minutes / user_session.total_minutes,
        'reported_satisfaction_post': user_session.exit_survey,
    }

Workplace well-being

WORKPLACE_DRIVERS = {
    'meaning': 'connect daily work to mission',
    'autonomy': 'decision authority within scope',
    'mastery': 'challenge slightly above skill',
    'relatedness': 'team rituals',
    'recognition': 'specific + timely',
}

Eudaimonic vs hedonic balance

def eudaimonic_hedonic_ratio(activities):
    eud = sum(a.duration for a in activities if a.type == 'meaning')
    hed = sum(a.duration for a in activities if a.type == 'pleasure')
    return eud / max(hed + eud, 1)  # 매 0.4-0.7 typical balance

Therapeutic exercise (3 good things)

def three_good_things_intervention(days=21):
    """매 Seligman evidence-based — 매 21d depression ↓."""
    return {
        'instruction': 'Write 3 good things at end of each day, with why each happened.',
        'duration_days': days,
        'expected_effect': 'depression_score_reduction',
    }

매 결정 기준

상황 Approach
Therapy PERMA + strengths
Coaching SDT + meaning
Workplace Meaning + autonomy
Education Growth + connection
AI product Time well spent metric
Self-development VIA + reflection

기본값: 매 multi-dimensional (PERMA / Ryff) + 매 SDT needs + 매 strengths use + 매 meaning > pleasure.

🔗 Graph

🤖 LLM 활용

언제: 매 coaching app. 매 mental health. 매 design ethics. 언제 X: 매 medical diagnosis (clinician).

안티패턴

  • Hedonic-only metric: 매 engagement trap.
  • Force positivity: 매 toxic positivity.
  • One-size-fits-all: 매 individual.
  • Ignore eudaimonic: 매 short-term comfort.
  • No measurement: 매 placebo.

🧪 검증 / 중복

  • Verified (Aristotle, Ryff 1989, Seligman PERMA, Deci & Ryan SDT).
  • 신뢰도 A.

🕓 Changelog

날짜 변경
2026-04-20 Auto-reinforced
2026-05-08 Phase 1
2026-05-10 Manual cleanup — PERMA / SDT / VIA / hedonic / meaning code