9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
6.4 KiB
6.4 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-actor-critic-models | Actor-Critic Models | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.95 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Actor-Critic Models
매 한 줄
"매 policy (actor) + value estimator (critic) 의 jointly train". Actor-critic = 매 policy gradient 의 high-variance 의 critic baseline (V or Q) 의 reduce 의 hybrid RL family. 매 modern landscape 의 backbone — PPO (Atari, locomotion, RLHF), SAC (continuous control), IMPALA/Ape-X (distributed), GRPO (LLM RL post-training, Claude/DeepSeek 2024-2026).
매 핵심
매 motivation
- REINFORCE pure policy gradient: ∇log π(a|s) · R — 매 high variance, 매 slow.
- Value-only (DQN): 매 discrete action 의 only, 매 stochastic policy 의 X.
- Actor-critic: ∇log π(a|s) · A(s,a) where A = Q − V (advantage) — 매 variance 의 reduce + 매 continuous action.
매 advantage estimation
- Monte Carlo: A = G_t − V(s) — 매 unbiased, 매 high variance.
- TD(0): A = r + γV(s') − V(s) — 매 biased, 매 low variance.
- GAE (Generalized Advantage Estimation): 매 λ-weighted blend — 매 modern default.
매 algorithm zoo
- A2C / A3C (2016): 매 synchronous / async parallel actor.
- PPO (2017): 매 clipped ratio, 매 industry default — robust + simple.
- SAC (2018): 매 entropy-regularized, 매 off-policy continuous.
- TD3: 매 twin Q + delayed policy update — DDPG fix.
- IMPALA: 매 V-trace correction 의 distributed off-policy.
- GRPO (DeepSeek 2024): 매 group relative advantage — 매 LLM RL post-training, 매 critic-free variant.
- DPO / IPO / KTO (2023-2024): 매 preference-based, 매 critic 의 implicit.
매 응용
- Game (Atari, StarCraft II, Dota 2 OpenAI Five).
- Robotics (locomotion, manipulation — SAC default).
- LLM RLHF post-training (PPO → GRPO / DPO 의 shift 2024-2026).
- Recommendation (counterfactual policy learning).
- Trading / market-making (risk-adjusted reward).
- Autonomous driving sim-to-real.
💻 패턴
PPO core (CleanRL-style)
import torch, torch.nn as nn
from torch.distributions import Normal
class ActorCritic(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, obs_dim, act_dim):
super().__init__()
self.shared = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(obs_dim, 64), nn.Tanh(), nn.Linear(64, 64), nn.Tanh())
self.mu = nn.Linear(64, act_dim)
self.log_std = nn.Parameter(torch.zeros(act_dim))
self.v = nn.Linear(64, 1)
def forward(self, x):
h = self.shared(x)
return Normal(self.mu(h), self.log_std.exp()), self.v(h).squeeze(-1)
def ppo_loss(logp_new, logp_old, adv, value, ret, ent, clip=0.2, vc=0.5, ec=0.01):
ratio = (logp_new - logp_old).exp()
surr1 = ratio * adv
surr2 = ratio.clamp(1 - clip, 1 + clip) * adv
pi_loss = -torch.min(surr1, surr2).mean()
v_loss = ((value - ret) ** 2).mean()
return pi_loss + vc * v_loss - ec * ent.mean()
GAE
def gae(rewards, values, dones, gamma=0.99, lam=0.95):
adv = torch.zeros_like(rewards)
last = 0.0
for t in reversed(range(len(rewards))):
nonterm = 1.0 - dones[t]
delta = rewards[t] + gamma * values[t+1] * nonterm - values[t]
last = delta + gamma * lam * nonterm * last
adv[t] = last
return adv
SAC update (continuous control)
# 매 twin Q + entropy temperature α auto-tune
q_target = r + gamma * (1 - d) * (torch.min(q1_t(s2, a2), q2_t(s2, a2)) - alpha * logp_a2)
q1_loss = ((q1(s, a) - q_target.detach()) ** 2).mean()
pi_loss = (alpha * logp - torch.min(q1(s, a_pi), q2(s, a_pi))).mean()
alpha_loss = -(log_alpha * (logp + target_entropy).detach()).mean()
GRPO (LLM RL post-training, 2024-2026)
# 매 group of K samples per prompt, 매 critic 의 X — group mean baseline
def grpo_advantage(rewards): # rewards: (B, K)
mean = rewards.mean(dim=1, keepdim=True)
std = rewards.std(dim=1, keepdim=True) + 1e-8
return (rewards - mean) / std # 매 normalized advantage
# loss = -E[ A * log π(y|x) ] + β * KL(π || π_ref)
DPO (preference-only, no reward model, no critic)
def dpo_loss(logp_w, logp_l, ref_logp_w, ref_logp_l, beta=0.1):
# w = winner (preferred), l = loser
return -torch.nn.functional.logsigmoid(beta * ((logp_w - ref_logp_w) - (logp_l - ref_logp_l))).mean()
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Algorithm |
|---|---|
| Discrete action, on-policy | PPO |
| Continuous control, sample-efficient | SAC |
| Massive parallel sim | IMPALA / Ape-X |
| LLM RLHF (with reward model) | PPO → GRPO 의 shift |
| LLM preference data only | DPO / IPO / KTO |
| Sparse reward, exploration-hard | PPO + RND/ICM |
| Offline data only | CQL / IQL (offline RL) |
기본값: 매 robotics — SAC. 매 game/sim — PPO. 매 LLM post-training — GRPO 또는 DPO.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Reinforcement Learning · Policy Gradient Methods
- 변형: PPO · A3C · GRPO
- 응용: RLHF
- Adjacent: GAE · DPO
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 LLM RLHF / RLAIF post-training (PPO/GRPO), 매 RL agent code review. 언제 X: 매 supervised data 의 abundant + simple — 매 SFT 의 first 의 try.
❌ 안티패턴
- No advantage normalize: 매 PPO 의 unstable — 매 per-batch normalize.
- Shared trunk too large: 매 actor/critic interference — 매 separate head 의 prefer 의 large model.
- Reward scaling skip: 매 value loss 의 explode — 매 running mean/std normalize.
- Off-policy data 의 PPO 의 reuse epoch >10: 매 ratio 의 explode — 매 4-10 epoch only.
- Critic 의 frozen leave: 매 value bootstrap 의 stale — 매 jointly update.
- GRPO 의 K=2: 매 baseline noise — 매 K≥4 (보통 8-16).
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Sutton & Barto 2nd ed Ch 13; Schulman et al. PPO 2017; Haarnoja SAC 2018; DeepSeek-Math GRPO 2024; Rafailov DPO 2023; CleanRL implementations).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — PPO/SAC/GRPO/DPO 2026 landscape + working code |