c24165b8bc
에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게 [공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류. 문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인). - Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존) - Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design - Topic_Business → Domain_Product - Topic_General → Domain_General - _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning), Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing) - 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서) - 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures) - 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.3 KiB
5.3 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-neuroergonomics | Neuroergonomics | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Neuroergonomics
매 한 줄
"매 brain at work — 매 neural signals 의 measure, 매 system 의 adapt". 매 2003 Parasuraman 의 coin, 매 fNIRS/EEG/eye-tracking 의 mature. 매 2026 의 closed-loop adaptive systems (cockpits, surgery, AR work) 의 deploy.
매 핵심
매 measurement modalities
- EEG: 매 ms-level temporal resolution. 매 cognitive load 의 alpha-suppression / theta-Fz 의 marker.
- fNIRS: 매 cortex hemodynamics. 매 portable, motion-tolerant — 매 real-world 의 work.
- Eye tracking: 매 fixation duration, pupil dilation — 매 mental effort 의 proxy.
- HRV / GSR: 매 ANS arousal — 매 stress / engagement.
매 cognitive states 의 detect
- Workload: 매 over-load → 매 error spike. 매 under-load → 매 vigilance drop.
- Vigilance / fatigue: 매 P300 amplitude decline + theta increase.
- Engagement / flow: 매 mid-frontal theta + alpha asymmetry.
매 응용
- 매 adaptive cockpit (Airbus, Honeywell): 매 pilot workload 의 high → 매 secondary task 의 defer.
- 매 surgical training: 매 trainee fNIRS prefrontal 의 over-activation = novice marker.
- 매 driver-state monitoring (Tesla v13, Mercedes Drive Pilot): 매 EEG drowsiness 의 detect.
💻 패턴
EEG workload index (theta/alpha ratio)
import mne, numpy as np
raw = mne.io.read_raw_brainvision('subj.vhdr', preload=True)
raw.filter(1, 40)
psd = raw.compute_psd(fmin=4, fmax=12, picks=['Fz', 'Pz'])
freqs = psd.freqs
power = psd.get_data() # (channels, freqs)
theta = power[:, (freqs >= 4) & (freqs < 8)].mean(axis=1)
alpha = power[:, (freqs >= 8) & (freqs < 13)].mean(axis=1)
workload_index = theta / alpha # higher = more load
fNIRS prefrontal activation (MNE-NIRS)
from mne_nirs.experimental_design import make_first_level_design_matrix
from mne_nirs.statistics import run_glm
raw_haemo = mne.preprocessing.nirs.beer_lambert_law(raw_od, ppf=0.1)
design = make_first_level_design_matrix(raw_haemo, drift_model='cosine')
glm = run_glm(raw_haemo, design)
# beta for HbO in PFC channels = task-evoked activation
pfc_activation = glm.to_dataframe().query("ch_name.str.contains('S1_D1') & Chroma=='hbo'")
Pupil-based effort (PsychoPy + Pupil Labs)
import zmq, msgpack
ctx = zmq.Context(); sub = ctx.socket(zmq.SUB)
sub.connect('tcp://127.0.0.1:50020'); sub.setsockopt_string(zmq.SUBSCRIBE, 'pupil')
while True:
topic, payload = sub.recv_multipart()
msg = msgpack.unpackb(payload)
if msg['confidence'] > 0.8:
diameter_mm = msg['diameter_3d']
# baseline-corrected pupil dilation = effort proxy
Closed-loop adaptive UI (workload-triggered)
class AdaptiveDashboard:
def tick(self, workload_idx: float):
if workload_idx > 1.5: # high load
self.hide_secondary_widgets()
self.enlarge_primary_alert()
elif workload_idx < 0.6: # under-load → boredom
self.inject_status_check()
else:
self.restore_default()
Drowsiness detector (real-time EEG)
from scipy.signal import welch
def is_drowsy(eeg_window, fs=256):
f, P = welch(eeg_window, fs=fs, nperseg=fs*2)
theta = P[(f>=4)&(f<8)].mean()
beta = P[(f>=13)&(f<30)].mean()
return (theta / beta) > 4.0 # KSS-validated threshold
NASA-TLX subjective + neural fusion
def fused_workload(neural_idx: float, tlx_score: float) -> float:
# weight neural higher when within-subject calibrated
return 0.6 * neural_idx_z + 0.4 * (tlx_score / 100)
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Lab, high precision needed | EEG (32-64ch) + eye-track |
| Field / mobile work | fNIRS + wearable HRV |
| Driver / pilot | Webcam-pupil + steering-entropy + PERCLOS |
| Long shift fatigue | Actigraphy + HRV + PVT |
기본값: fNIRS + eye-tracking — 매 real-world ecological validity 의 best.
🔗 Graph
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 study design review, 매 GLM script generation, 매 multimodal-feature engineering, 매 paper synthesis. 언제 X: 매 raw artifact rejection, 매 individual-subject calibration — 매 expert review 의 require.
❌ 안티패턴
- Single-modality reliance: 매 EEG-only 의 motion artifact 에 fragile. 매 fusion 의 require.
- No baseline: 매 absolute power 의 between-subject 의 noisy. 매 within-subject z-score 의 use.
- Open-loop dashboard: 매 measure-but-not-act → 매 value 의 zero. 매 closed-loop 의 design.
- No personalization: 매 group-mean threshold 의 50% individuals 에 wrong.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Parasuraman & Rizzo 2007 Neuroergonomics; Ayaz & Dehais 2019).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — modalities + closed-loop adaptive patterns |