f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.0 KiB
5.0 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-dopamine | Dopamine | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.85 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Dopamine
매 한 줄
"매 reward prediction error 의 signal". 매 dopamine 의 modern view 는 pleasure 의 X, 매 expected vs actual reward 의 차이 의 broadcast. 매 Schultz (1997) 의 monkey VTA recording 의 RL 의 TD-error 의 isomorphism 의 establish. 매 product UX, addiction design, RL algorithm 의 shared substrate.
매 핵심
매 RPE (Reward Prediction Error)
- Positive RPE: 매 expected 보다 better. 매 dopamine burst.
- Zero RPE: 매 fully predicted. 매 baseline firing.
- Negative RPE: 매 expected 보다 worse. 매 firing dip.
매 RL 의 TD-error 와 의 mapping
- 매 δ = r + γV(s') − V(s).
- 매 dopamine neuron 의 firing rate 의 δ 의 encode (Schultz, Dayan, Montague 1997).
매 응용
- Variable-ratio schedule (slot machine, social media feed) — 매 maximal RPE.
- Habit formation (intermittent reward).
- Anhedonia / addiction 의 dopaminergic dysregulation.
- RL agent design (curiosity, intrinsic motivation).
💻 패턴
TD-learning (dopamine-analog)
import numpy as np
def td_update(V, s, r, s_next, alpha=0.1, gamma=0.9):
"""V: value table. δ = TD error = 'dopamine signal'."""
delta = r + gamma * V[s_next] - V[s] # ← RPE
V[s] += alpha * delta
return delta # log this; it's the 'dopamine'
V = np.zeros(10)
for episode in range(1000):
s, r, s_next = sample_transition()
rpe = td_update(V, s, r, s_next)
Curiosity-driven exploration (intrinsic dopamine analog)
# Random Network Distillation (Burda 2018)
class RND(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.target = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(64, 128), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(128, 64))
self.predictor = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(64, 128), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(128, 64))
for p in self.target.parameters(): p.requires_grad = False
def intrinsic_reward(self, obs):
with torch.no_grad():
target = self.target(obs)
pred = self.predictor(obs)
return ((target - pred) ** 2).mean(-1) # novelty bonus
Variable-ratio schedule simulator
def variable_ratio_session(p_reward=0.1, n_pulls=100):
rpe_log = []
expected = p_reward # learned expectation
for _ in range(n_pulls):
r = 1.0 if np.random.rand() < p_reward else 0.0
rpe = r - expected
expected += 0.05 * rpe # slow learning
rpe_log.append(rpe)
return rpe_log
# Pattern: high-amplitude RPE persists → "addictive" engagement
Hyperbolic discounting (dopamine-future)
def hyperbolic_value(reward, delay, k=0.1):
"""Real human/animal — closer to hyperbolic than exponential."""
return reward / (1 + k * delay)
Opponent process (reward + aversion)
# Two-system: dopamine (reward) + serotonin (aversion / patience)
def dual_system_update(V_reward, V_aversion, r_pos, r_neg, s, s_next, alpha=0.1, gamma=0.9):
delta_reward = r_pos + gamma * V_reward[s_next] - V_reward[s]
delta_aversion = r_neg + gamma * V_aversion[s_next] - V_aversion[s]
V_reward[s] += alpha * delta_reward
V_aversion[s] += alpha * delta_aversion
return delta_reward, delta_aversion
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Insight |
|---|---|
| Habit-forming product | Variable-ratio reward (Slot machine schedule) |
| Sustained engagement | Mix predictable + unpredictable wins |
| Avoid burnout | Avoid pure RPE-maximization (ethical concern) |
| RL exploration stuck | Add intrinsic reward (RND, ICM) |
| Anhedonia in user | Reduce expectation, surprise with low-cost wins |
기본값: 매 RPE-aware design — but 매 ethics 의 weight (manipulation 의 risk).
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Reinforcement Learning
- 응용: Habit Formation · Game Design · Recommender Systems
- Adjacent: TD-Learning · Behavioral Economics
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 product UX 의 retention mechanic 의 audit. 매 dark-pattern 의 detection. 언제 X: 매 clinical advice. 매 LLM 의 medical claim 의 X.
❌ 안티패턴
- Dopamine = pleasure 의 simplification: 매 X. 매 RPE 의 signal — pleasure 는 separate (opioid).
- Pure exploitation (no novelty): 매 user 의 RPE 의 0 의 disengage.
- Manipulative dark pattern: 매 ethical violation. 매 design 의 audit 의 mandatory.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Schultz 1997 Science, Sutton & Barto 2018, Berridge 2007).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — RPE / TD-learning isomorphism + UX implication |