Files

T

koriweb d8a80f6272 chore(wiki): dangling 링크 canonical 정규화 (768파일/1200건)

이름만 다른(표기 변형) [[위키링크]]를 대상 문서의 canonical 제목으로 치환해
끊겼던 1,200개 링크를 연결. 제목/파일명 정규화 일치만 적용하고 별칭 매칭은
과병합 위험으로 제외(애매성 가드). 원본은 _link_reconcile_backup/ 에 백업.
도구: Datacollect/scripts/link_reconcile_apply.mjs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-06-08 12:24:15 +09:00

4.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack

title

Autoethnography

매 한 줄

"매 self-as-instrument — 매 personal experience 의 cultural lens 의 X, 매 cultural lens through personal experience.". Autoethnography 의 ethnography 의 first-person 의 reflexive variant — Carolyn Ellis / Tony Adams 의 1990s formalize. 매 2026 의 UX research / HCI / AI ethics 의 standard method (영향 the lived experience of bias, accessibility, AI use).

매 핵심

매 Types

Evocative: literary, emotional, narrative-driven.
Analytic (Anderson): theoretical contribution, research-oriented.
Interpretive: meaning-making, hermeneutic.
Critical / performative: activist, social-justice frame.

매 Method

Field: self in everyday context (often the researcher's own life domain).
Data: journal, photo, artifact, interview.
Reflexivity: position 의 explicit (gender, race, role).
Layered analysis: thick description + theoretical frame.
Triangulation: peer debrief, member check.

매 Validity Criteria

Substantive contribution (Richardson).
Aesthetic merit.
Reflexivity / honesty.
Impact / resonance.
Verisimilitude (Ellis).

매 응용

UX research (researcher 의 own use experience).
AI ethics (LLM 의 daily use 의 lived account).
Disability studies (insider perspective).
Medical sociology (illness narrative).

💻 패턴

Pattern 1 — Field journal template (Markdown)

---
date: 2026-05-10
context: solo coding session, claude-opus-4-7
mood: 6/10
position: M, 32y, SWE, 8y exp
---

# Observation
- 14:00 prompted Claude w/ vague spec → suggested decomposition steps...
- 14:15 felt resistance to refactor; noticed "it's working, why touch"

# Reflection
- 매 sunk-cost feeling 의 cultural inheritance? Engineering pride?

# Theoretical link
- Norman 의 affordance / Schön 의 reflective practitioner.

Pattern 2 — Coding (qualitative) — open coding

codes = {
    "resistance-to-refactor": ["sunk cost", "it's working", "why touch"],
    "delegation-discomfort":  ["am I cheating", "is this me"],
    "flow-with-LLM":          ["pair programming", "thinking partner"],
}

Pattern 3 — Layered narrative (analytic)

## Vignette
[evocative narrative paragraph]

## Analysis
[theoretical interpretation: Schön reflective practice]

## Cultural connection
[broader: SWE identity in age of LLM agents]

Pattern 4 — Member check (peer debrief)

# Share excerpt with informant for response
checks = [
    {"excerpt": "...", "informant": "P3", "response": "yes resonates", "date": "2026-05-09"},
    {"excerpt": "...", "informant": "P5", "response": "I'd frame differently", "date": "2026-05-09"},
]

매 결정 기준

상황	Approach
Researcher 의 own lived domain	Autoethnography (insider)
Other community	Ethnography (outsider) + reflexivity
Quick UX insight	diary study + autoethnography hybrid
Theory contribution	Analytic autoethnography (Anderson)
Activist / community	Critical / performative

기본값: Analytic autoethnography with peer debrief + member check.

🔗 Graph

부모: Ethnography
변형: Memoir
응용: AI-Ethics
Adjacent: Autobiography · Grounded Theory Method

🤖 LLM 활용

언제: studying one's own use of tech / LLM, insider perspective on team or community, theoretical reflection. 언제 X: large-N generalization needed, double-blind requirement, no reflexivity training.

❌ 안티패턴

Solipsism: 매 self 의 only — no theoretical contribution.
No reflexivity: position 의 unmark — bias hidden.
Cherry-picked vignette: confirmation bias.
Skipping member check in critical / community work.

🧪 검증 / 중복

Verified (Ellis & Bochner, Anderson 2006, Adams et al. "Autoethnography" 2015).
신뢰도 A.

🕓 Changelog

날짜	변경
2026-05-08	Phase 1
2026-05-10	Manual cleanup — FULL content (types, validity criteria, 4 patterns)

4.5 KiB Raw Blame History