Files
2nd/10_Wiki/Topics/Other/Blog_Content_Rules.md
T
Antigravity Agent f8b21af4be Wiki cleanup: error-doc removal, dedup merge, link normalization
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리:
- 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거
- 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect)
- 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건
- 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성
- Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 23:52:15 +09:00

6.0 KiB

id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
id title category status canonical_id aliases duplicate_of source_trust_level confidence_score verification_status tags raw_sources last_reinforced github_commit tech_stack
P-REINFORCE-AUTO-1FF145 Blog Content Rules 10_Wiki/Topics verified self
Blogging Rules
Content Standards
none A 0.9 applied
writing
content
blogging
style
2026-05-10 pending
language framework
markdown hugo-astro

Blog Content Rules

매 한 줄

"매 Great blog post = ONE clear thesis + concrete evidence + minimal friction". 2026 zero-click search era에서는 first 50 words가 entire UX를 결정 — LLM AI overview가 이미 답을 미리 보여주기 때문. 매 핵심: 매 reader's time 의 ruthlessly respect, 매 SEO theater 의 최소화.

매 핵심

매 Structural rules

  • One thesis per post: 매 sub-thesis의 새 post로 split.
  • Inverted pyramid: 매 conclusion-first — TL;DR 의 top.
  • Scannable hierarchy: H2 마다 self-contained section, 매 reader 의 jump-in 가능.
  • Concrete > abstract: 매 example의 매 claim 의 precede.

매 Style rules

  • Active voice default — passive 매 deliberate choice.
  • Sentence length variance: short. 매 medium. 매 occasional longer sentence that establishes context and rhythm before snap.
  • No hedging spirals: "perhaps it might possibly seem that" → cut.
  • Tech terms: define on first use, 매 jargon 의 reader-respect.

매 응용

  1. Engineering blog post (technical deep-dive, 1500-3000 words).
  2. Changelog/release notes (factual, scannable, 200-500 words).
  3. Tutorial (step-by-step, runnable code, copy-paste friendly).
  4. Opinion/essay (single thesis, supporting evidence, counterargument acknowledged).

💻 패턴

Frontmatter template (Astro/Hugo)

---
title: "Concrete claim, not 'Thoughts on X'"
description: "1-sentence value proposition under 160 chars for SERP"
publishDate: 2026-05-10
updatedDate: 2026-05-10
author: "Name"
tags: [primary-tag, secondary-tag]
draft: false
canonical: "https://blog.example.com/post-slug"
ogImage: "/og/post-slug.png"
---

Lint rules (vale + textlint)

# .vale.ini
StylesPath = styles
MinAlertLevel = warning

[*.md]
BasedOnStyles = Vale, write-good, Microsoft

# styles/Custom/Hedges.yml
extends: existence
message: "Hedge word '%s' — cut or commit."
level: warning
tokens:
  - perhaps
  - maybe
  - somewhat
  - quite
  - rather
  - seems to

Reading-time + word-count check

import re
from pathlib import Path

def analyze_post(path: Path) -> dict:
    text = path.read_text()
    body = re.sub(r"^---.*?---", "", text, count=1, flags=re.S)
    words = re.findall(r"\w+", body)
    n = len(words)
    return {
        "words": n,
        "minutes": round(n / 230),  # avg adult reading speed
        "h2_count": len(re.findall(r"^## ", body, flags=re.M)),
        "code_blocks": body.count("```") // 2,
        "links": len(re.findall(r"\[.+?\]\(.+?\)", body)),
    }

TL;DR generator (Claude 4.7)

from anthropic import Anthropic

def generate_tldr(post_md: str) -> str:
    client = Anthropic()
    msg = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-opus-4-7",
        max_tokens=200,
        system=("Write a 2-3 sentence TL;DR. State the thesis, the key evidence, "
                "and one actionable takeaway. No hedging. No 'this post discusses'."),
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": post_md[:6000]}],
    )
    return msg.content[0].text

SEO sanity check

def seo_check(frontmatter: dict, body: str) -> list[str]:
    issues = []
    title = frontmatter.get("title", "")
    desc = frontmatter.get("description", "")
    if not (10 <= len(title) <= 60):
        issues.append(f"title length {len(title)} outside 10-60")
    if not (50 <= len(desc) <= 160):
        issues.append(f"description length {len(desc)} outside 50-160")
    if "## " not in body:
        issues.append("no H2 — flat structure hurts scannability")
    if body.count("](") < 2:
        issues.append("fewer than 2 links — orphan post")
    return issues

Image optimization (sharp)

import sharp from "sharp";

async function optimize(input, slug) {
  await sharp(input)
    .resize(1200, 630, { fit: "cover" })
    .webp({ quality: 82 })
    .toFile(`public/og/${slug}.webp`);
  await sharp(input)
    .resize(800)
    .webp({ quality: 80 })
    .toFile(`public/img/${slug}.webp`);
}

매 결정 기준

상황 Approach
Tutorial Step-numbered, runnable code, prereqs at top
Opinion piece Thesis in title, counter-argument paragraph required
Release notes Bulleted, version + date, breaking changes flagged
Long-form essay Add ToC, 1500+ words, 3-5 H2s
News/timely Publish date prominent, update date if revised

기본값: 매 post 의 ship before perfect — 매 published-and-iterated 의 unpublished-and-perfect 의 superior.

🔗 Graph

🤖 LLM 활용

언제: TL;DR drafting, headline A/B variants, hedging-word detection, SEO description generation, outline scaffolding. 언제 X: full-post ghostwriting (매 voice 의 lost), factual claims requiring expertise, opinion pieces (매 author voice required).

안티패턴

  • SEO keyword stuffing: 매 2026 search era에 penalize됨, reader-trust 의 erode.
  • Listicle without substance: "10 ways to X" with shallow points.
  • Buried lede: 매 thesis 의 paragraph 5 — modern reader 의 already gone.
  • Engagement-bait title: "You won't believe..." — 매 trust-killer.
  • Hedging spiral: 매 every claim 의 qualifier — reader 의 actual position 의 unclear.

🧪 검증 / 중복

  • Verified (Strunk & White; Zinsser On Writing Well; Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines 2025).
  • 신뢰도 A.

🕓 Changelog

날짜 변경
2026-04-20 Auto-reinforced placeholder
2026-05-10 Manual cleanup — full substantive content, 6 patterns