d8a80f6272
이름만 다른(표기 변형) [[위키링크]]를 대상 문서의 canonical 제목으로 치환해 끊겼던 1,200개 링크를 연결. 제목/파일명 정규화 일치만 적용하고 별칭 매칭은 과병합 위험으로 제외(애매성 가드). 원본은 _link_reconcile_backup/ 에 백업. 도구: Datacollect/scripts/link_reconcile_apply.mjs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.6 KiB
5.6 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-modern-review-workflow | Modern Review Workflow | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Modern Review Workflow
매 한 줄
"매 review = human judgment + AI scaffolding". 2026년 PR review 매 single-reviewer linting → multi-agent triage 의 진화. Claude Opus 4.7 / Codex 가 매 first-pass (style, security, regression) 를 처리, human 의 매 architectural / product 판단에 집중.
매 핵심
매 단계
- Pre-PR: 매 author-side
claude reviewlocal 의 self-check. - CI gate: 매 automated agent 의 매 diff scan — security, perf, test coverage.
- Human review: 매 design intent / API contract / UX trade-off 의 deep dive.
- Post-merge: 매 deploy preview + canary metrics 의 watch.
매 agent layer
- Linter agent: style, type, dead code.
- Security agent: secret scan, OWASP, dependency CVE.
- Test agent: coverage delta, flaky detect, mutation score.
- Review agent: 매 prose summary + risk flag (Claude Opus 4.7).
매 응용
- Solo dev: 매 CI agent 만 = 매 reviewer 효과.
- 팀 (10+): tiered — agent gate → senior architect.
- OSS: 매 maintainer triage 의 cost 감소.
💻 패턴
GitHub Actions: Claude review hook
name: ai-review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
jobs:
review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with: { fetch-depth: 0 }
- uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
api-key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
model: claude-opus-4-7
mode: review
target-base: ${{ github.base_ref }}
comment-style: inline
Inline comment poster
import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk";
import { Octokit } from "@octokit/rest";
const a = new Anthropic();
const gh = new Octokit({ auth: process.env.GH_TOKEN });
export async function reviewDiff(owner: string, repo: string, pr: number) {
const { data: files } = await gh.pulls.listFiles({ owner, repo, pull_number: pr });
const diff = files.map((f) => `### ${f.filename}\n${f.patch ?? ""}`).join("\n\n");
const res = await a.messages.create({
model: "claude-opus-4-7",
max_tokens: 4096,
system: "You are a senior reviewer. Output JSON: {comments: [{path, line, body, severity}]}.",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: diff }],
});
const { comments } = JSON.parse((res.content[0] as any).text);
for (const c of comments) {
await gh.pulls.createReviewComment({
owner, repo, pull_number: pr, ...c,
commit_id: process.env.HEAD_SHA!,
});
}
}
Local pre-PR self-check
# .git/hooks/pre-push
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
git diff origin/main...HEAD | claude -p "Review this diff. Flag bugs, security, perf only. No style." --model claude-opus-4-7
Risk-tiered routing
type Risk = "low" | "medium" | "high";
function classify(diff: string): Risk {
if (/migrations\/|schema\./.test(diff)) return "high";
if (/auth|payment|crypto/i.test(diff)) return "high";
if (diff.split("\n").length > 500) return "medium";
return "low";
}
function reviewers(r: Risk): string[] {
return {
low: ["ai-bot"],
medium: ["ai-bot", "@team-lead"],
high: ["ai-bot", "@security", "@architect"],
}[r];
}
Mutation-test gate
- name: stryker
run: npx stryker run --threshold.break 70
Coverage delta comment
const before = await coverage("main");
const after = await coverage("HEAD");
const delta = after.lines - before.lines;
if (delta < -1) await gh.issues.createComment({
...ctx, body: `⚠️ Coverage dropped ${delta.toFixed(1)}%`,
});
Auto-merge on green + AI ack
- if: ${{ steps.ai-review.outputs.severity == 'none' && steps.tests.outcome == 'success' }}
run: gh pr merge ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --squash --auto
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Solo / OSS | AI agent only, human spot-check |
| Small team | AI gate + 1 human (rotating) |
| Regulated (fin/health) | AI + 2 humans + audit log |
| Hot path / migrations | Mandatory architect review |
기본값: AI first-pass + 1 human reviewer + risk-tiered escalation.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: CI CD
- 변형: Pair-Programming · Mob-Programming
- 응용: Trunk-Based-Development
- Adjacent: Static-Analysis · Mutation-Testing
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 diff scan, security triage, coverage summary, prose explanation 의 PR description. 언제 X: 매 architectural decision, API contract negotiation, domain-specific business rule — human 의 judgment.
❌ 안티패턴
- AI rubber-stamp: 매 agent approve = 매 human 의 skip. 매 critical path 의 review 누락.
- Comment flood: agent 의 매 nitpick → noise. Severity threshold 의 setting.
- No risk tiering: schema migration 매 typo fix 와 동급 review → bottleneck.
- Secrets in prompt: diff 의 secret 의 leak. Pre-scan + redact.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (GitHub blog 2025, Anthropic Claude Code docs 2026, Google Eng Practices).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — AI-augmented PR review workflow with Claude Opus 4.7 patterns |