Files
2nd/10_Wiki/Topics/Architecture/Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM).md
T
Antigravity Agent f8b21af4be Wiki cleanup: error-doc removal, dedup merge, link normalization
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리:
- 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거
- 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect)
- 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건
- 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성
- Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 23:52:15 +09:00

4.9 KiB

id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
id title category status canonical_id aliases duplicate_of source_trust_level confidence_score verification_status tags raw_sources last_reinforced github_commit tech_stack
wiki-2026-0508-dynamic-systems-development-meth Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) 10_Wiki/Topics verified self
DSDM
Atern
AgilePF
none B 0.85 applied
agile
methodology
project-management
architecture
2026-05-10 pending
language framework
methodology agile

Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM)

매 한 줄

"매 fix the time/cost, flex the features". 1994년 UK consortium 의 RAD 의 evolution 의 develop, 매 원조 agile method (Agile Manifesto 2001 보다 7년 앞섬). 매 2026 의 매 niche — 매 SAFe / Scrum / Kanban 의 dominate, 매 DSDM 의 enterprise governance 의 좋은 reference.

매 핵심

매 8 Principles

  1. Focus on the business need.
  2. Deliver on time.
  3. Collaborate.
  4. Never compromise quality.
  5. Build incrementally from firm foundations.
  6. Develop iteratively.
  7. Communicate continuously and clearly.
  8. Demonstrate control.

매 MoSCoW Prioritization

  • Must have — 매 minimum viable.
  • Should have — 매 important 이지만 매 not vital.
  • Could have — 매 nice-to-have.
  • Won't have (this time) — 매 explicit out-of-scope.

매 Phases

  1. Pre-project — feasibility approval.
  2. Feasibility — high-level scope.
  3. Foundations — business / solution / management approach.
  4. Evolutionary Development — timeboxed iterations (2-6 weeks).
  5. Deployment — release.
  6. Post-project — benefits realization.

매 Roles

  • Business Sponsor / Visionary / Ambassador — 매 business side.
  • Technical Coordinator / Solution Developer / Tester — 매 dev side.
  • Project Manager / Team Leader — 매 facilitation.

매 응용

  1. Government / regulated projects — 매 audit trail required.
  2. Fixed-deadline launches — 매 features 의 flex.
  3. Hybrid waterfall→agile transitions.

💻 패턴

Pattern 1: MoSCoW backlog (JSON)

{
  "must": [
    {"id": "AUTH-1", "title": "User login", "effort": 5},
    {"id": "PAY-1", "title": "Stripe checkout", "effort": 8}
  ],
  "should": [
    {"id": "PAY-2", "title": "Saved payment methods", "effort": 5}
  ],
  "could": [
    {"id": "UI-1", "title": "Dark mode", "effort": 3}
  ],
  "wont": [
    {"id": "PAY-3", "title": "Cryptocurrency", "reason": "out of scope v1"}
  ]
}

Pattern 2: Timebox tracking

interface Timebox {
  id: string;
  name: string;
  startDate: Date;
  endDate: Date;        // 매 fixed
  must: Story[];        // 매 100% required
  should: Story[];      // 매 80% target
  could: Story[];       // 매 20-60% expected
}

function timeboxHealth(tb: Timebox): "green"|"amber"|"red" {
  const mustDone = tb.must.filter(s => s.status === "done").length / tb.must.length;
  if (mustDone < 0.5) return "red";
  if (mustDone < 1.0) return "amber";
  return "green";
}

Pattern 3: Facilitated Workshop agenda

# Foundations Workshop (Day 1)
09:00 — Business vision (Sponsor)
10:00 — Solution architecture sketch (Tech Coord)
11:00 — MoSCoW first pass (all)
13:00 — Risk / dependency mapping
15:00 — Timebox plan
16:30 — Commitment / sign-off

Pattern 4: Modeling — high level only

flowchart LR
  User[(User)] --> API
  API --> Auth
  API --> Order
  Order --> Payment[(Stripe)]
  Order --> DB[(Postgres)]

Pattern 5: Daily Stand-up (DSDM flavor)

Yesterday:    what advanced Must/Should items
Today:        which Must/Should items
Blockers:     escalate to Project Manager same day
Timebox burn: x days remaining / y stories left

매 결정 기준

상황 Approach
Fixed deadline (regulatory) DSDM (timebox + MoSCoW)
Feature-driven product Scrum
Continuous flow ops Kanban
Large enterprise (>100 devs) SAFe + DSDM principles
Modern startup Scrum-ish or Shape Up

기본값: 매 Scrum 으로 시작, 매 fixed-deadline 시 DSDM MoSCoW 의 borrow.

🔗 Graph

🤖 LLM 활용

언제: 매 enterprise / regulated agile 의 reference, 매 MoSCoW 의 prioritization. 언제 X: 매 modern product team — 매 Scrum / Shape Up 의 simpler.

안티패턴

  • MoSCoW 의 abuse: 매 모두 Must — 매 prioritization 의 lost.
  • Timebox 의 extend: 매 DSDM core 의 violate.
  • Heavy documentation: 매 RAD 의 origin 의 betray.
  • No business presence: 매 Ambassador role 의 essential.

🧪 검증 / 중복

  • Verified (DSDM Consortium / Agile Business Consortium handbook, ISO/IEC TR 29110).
  • 신뢰도 B (매 niche method, 매 modern usage 의 limited).

🕓 Changelog

날짜 변경
2026-05-08 Phase 1
2026-05-10 Manual cleanup — 8 principles + MoSCoW + timebox