d8a80f6272
이름만 다른(표기 변형) [[위키링크]]를 대상 문서의 canonical 제목으로 치환해 끊겼던 1,200개 링크를 연결. 제목/파일명 정규화 일치만 적용하고 별칭 매칭은 과병합 위험으로 제외(애매성 가드). 원본은 _link_reconcile_backup/ 에 백업. 도구: Datacollect/scripts/link_reconcile_apply.mjs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.6 KiB
6.6 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-architecture-refactor | Architecture Refactor | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Architecture Refactor
매 한 줄
"매 incremental 의 always wins". 매 architecture refactor 의 default approach 의 Martin Fowler 의 Strangler Fig (2004) — 매 old system 의 around 의 new system 의 gradual 의 grow. 매 big-bang rewrite 의 historically failure rate >70% (Ousterhout, Brooks). 매 2026 의 typical pattern: 매 monolith → modular monolith → selective service extraction.
매 핵심
매 refactor strategies
- Strangler Fig: 매 facade 의 routing — 매 traffic 의 incrementally 의 new system 의 redirect.
- Branch by Abstraction: 매 abstraction layer 의 introduce — 매 dual 의 implementation — 매 old 의 remove.
- Parallel Run: 매 old + new 의 동시 실행 — 매 output 의 compare.
- Big Bang Rewrite: 매 last resort — 매 only 매 system 의 small + scope 의 frozen 의 가능.
매 refactor 의 prerequisite
- Test coverage: 매 characterization tests (Feathers) 의 minimum.
- Observability: 매 metrics + traces 의 before/after diff.
- Feature flag: 매 reversibility 의 prerequisite.
- ADR: 매 decision rationale 의 documented.
매 응용
- Monolith → modular monolith — 매 module boundary 의 enforce (ArchUnit).
- Service extraction — 매 bounded context 의 따라.
- Database split — 매 most expensive — 매 last 의 do.
- Framework upgrade — 매 incremental migration.
💻 패턴
Strangler Fig — Nginx routing facade
upstream legacy { server legacy.internal:8080; }
upstream new { server new.internal:8080; }
server {
listen 443 ssl;
# New endpoints — gradual rollout
location /api/v2/orders { proxy_pass http://new; }
location /api/v2/users { proxy_pass http://new; }
# Everything else still legacy
location / { proxy_pass http://legacy; }
}
Branch by Abstraction (Java)
// Step 1 — extract interface
interface PaymentGateway {
Receipt charge(Order o);
}
// Step 2 — wrap legacy
class LegacyStripeGateway implements PaymentGateway { /* ... */ }
// Step 3 — new impl behind flag
class AdyenGateway implements PaymentGateway { /* ... */ }
// Step 4 — feature-flag pick
class GatewayFactory {
PaymentGateway pick(String tenant) {
return flags.isOn("adyen", tenant)
? new AdyenGateway()
: new LegacyStripeGateway();
}
}
// Step 5 — once 100% rollout, delete LegacyStripeGateway
Parallel Run (shadow traffic)
async function chargeShadow(order: Order): Promise<Receipt> {
const [primary, shadow] = await Promise.allSettled([
legacy.charge(order),
newImpl.charge(order) // never persists, just observes
]);
if (shadow.status === 'fulfilled' && primary.status === 'fulfilled') {
diff.record('charge', primary.value, shadow.value);
}
return primary.status === 'fulfilled' ? primary.value : Promise.reject(primary.reason);
}
Database Strangling — dual write + read switch
# Phase 1: dual write
def save_order(o: Order):
legacy_db.insert(o)
try:
new_db.insert(o)
except Exception as e:
log.warn("shadow write failed", e=e)
# Phase 2: dual read + diff
def get_order(id: str):
a = legacy_db.get(id)
b = new_db.get(id)
if a != b: metrics.increment("order.read.diverge")
return a # legacy still source of truth
# Phase 3: flip read source
def get_order(id: str):
return new_db.get(id)
# Phase 4: stop legacy write, decommission
Module extraction (modular monolith → service)
# 1. Codify module boundary first (ArchUnit)
# 2. Replace direct calls with in-process interface
# 3. Add feature flag: in-process vs HTTP/gRPC
# 4. Deploy as separate process behind flag
# 5. Remove in-process path
Characterization test (Feathers)
import json, pytest
@pytest.mark.parametrize("fixture", load_fixtures("legacy_outputs/*.json"))
def test_legacy_behavior_preserved(fixture):
inputs = fixture["input"]
expected = fixture["legacy_output"]
actual = new_impl.run(**inputs)
assert actual == expected, f"divergence: {fixture['id']}"
Refactor scoreboard (CI)
# refactor-progress.yml — auto-generated dashboard
metrics:
- name: legacy-endpoints-remaining
cmd: grep -r "@legacy" src/ | wc -l
- name: new-coverage
cmd: jacoco --module=new-impl
- name: traffic-on-new
promql: sum(rate(http_requests_total{service="new"}[5m]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Active legacy + traffic | Strangler Fig |
| Library/abstraction swap | Branch by Abstraction |
| Risk-critical (payment, billing) | Parallel Run |
| DB schema change | Dual-write + flip read |
| Tiny system, frozen scope | Big Bang (rare) |
| Distributed monolith | Reverse first → modular monolith → extract |
기본값: Strangler Fig + feature flag + parallel-run on critical paths.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Software Architecture · Refactoring_Best_Practices
- 변형: Strangler-Fig · Branch-by-Abstraction
- 응용: Modular Monolith · Microservices
- Adjacent: Architecture Erosion (아키텍처 침식) · Architectural-Constraint-Enforcement · Architecture Review (아키텍처 및 설계 리뷰)
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 legacy code → modern equivalent translation, 매 codemod plan generation, 매 ADR draft. 언제 X: 매 production cutover decision — 매 human + traffic data 의 필수.
❌ 안티패턴
- Big bang rewrite: 매 70%+ failure rate — 매 last resort.
- Refactor without tests: 매 silent regression 의 guarantee.
- No flag, no rollback: 매 forward-only deploy — 매 incident magnification.
- Premature service extraction: 매 distributed monolith 의 worst-of-both.
- Stop midway: 매 두 system 의 forever maintain — 매 cost 의 doubled.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Fowler — StranglerFigApplication; Feathers — Working Effectively with Legacy Code; Newman — Monolith to Microservices).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — Strangler Fig + Branch-by-Abstraction + parallel-run patterns |