f8b21af4be
10_Wiki/Topics 대규모 정리: - 오류 캡처/미완성 stub 문서 227개 제거 - 교차폴더 중복 43클러스터 병합 (63파일 → redirect) - 링크명 정규화: 깨진 링크 수정·redirect 직결·개념 매핑 ~2,400건 - 카테고리 MOC 6개 신규 생성 - Graph 섹션 미해결 related-keyword 링크 10,058건 제거 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.7 KiB
8.7 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-data-distillation | Data Distillation | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.88 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Data Distillation
매 한 줄
"매 1000 의 image 의 매 10 의 essence". 매 huge dataset → 매 tiny synthetic. 매 model 의 same performance. 매 modern: 매 sLLM (small LLM) 의 trend — 매 GPT-4 의 distill 의 매 7B model. 매 Phi-3, 매 distillation 의 frontier.
매 핵심
매 vs Knowledge Distillation
- Knowledge Distillation (Hinton 2015): 매 teacher model → 매 student model.
- Data Distillation (Wang 2018): 매 dataset → 매 small synthetic dataset.
- 둘 다 의 commonly combine.
매 dataset distillation methods
Gradient Matching (Zhao 2021, DC)
- 매 synthetic 의 train 의 gradient ≈ 매 real 의.
Distribution Matching (DM)
- 매 feature distribution 의 match.
Trajectory Matching (MTT, Cazenavette 2022)
- 매 training trajectory 의 match.
Generative
- 매 GAN / Diffusion 의 generate small.
매 modern (LLM era)
Self-Distillation
- 매 large model 의 generate → 매 small model 의 train.
- 매 Phi-3 (Microsoft).
- 매 Llama-3 의 cleaning.
Distillation from Frontier
- 매 GPT-4 의 reasoning trace → 매 7B fine-tune.
- 매 ChatGPT → Vicuna, Alpaca.
Quality > Quantity
- 매 LIMA paper (Zhou 2023): 매 1K example 의 powerful.
- 매 careful curation > 매 raw scrape.
매 응용
- Edge ML: 매 small training data.
- Privacy: 매 raw data 의 X.
- Continual learning: 매 replay 의 compact.
- Architecture search: 매 fast NAS.
- sLLM: 매 small but capable.
매 trade-off
- Compression ratio: 매 1% size 매 95% performance.
- Generalization to new architecture: 매 weak (architecture-specific).
- Data privacy + 매 utility 의 balance.
💻 패턴
Knowledge distillation (model)
import torch
import torch.nn.functional as F
def distill_loss(student_logits, teacher_logits, labels, T=4, alpha=0.7):
soft_loss = F.kl_div(
F.log_softmax(student_logits / T, dim=-1),
F.softmax(teacher_logits / T, dim=-1),
reduction='batchmean',
) * T * T
hard_loss = F.cross_entropy(student_logits, labels)
return alpha * soft_loss + (1 - alpha) * hard_loss
# 매 training
for x, y in loader:
with torch.no_grad():
teacher_out = teacher(x)
student_out = student(x)
loss = distill_loss(student_out, teacher_out, y)
loss.backward()
Dataset distillation (Gradient Matching, simplified)
def gradient_matching(real_loader, synthetic_data, model, n_iters=1000):
"""매 매 step 의 synthetic 의 update 의 real 의 gradient 와 의 match."""
syn_x = torch.randn(N_SYN, C, H, W, requires_grad=True)
syn_y = torch.randint(0, n_classes, (N_SYN,))
for it in range(n_iters):
# 매 real gradient
real_x, real_y = next(iter(real_loader))
real_loss = F.cross_entropy(model(real_x), real_y)
real_grad = torch.autograd.grad(real_loss, model.parameters())
# 매 synthetic gradient
syn_loss = F.cross_entropy(model(syn_x), syn_y)
syn_grad = torch.autograd.grad(syn_loss, model.parameters(), create_graph=True)
# 매 match
match_loss = sum((rg - sg).pow(2).mean() for rg, sg in zip(real_grad, syn_grad))
syn_x.grad = torch.autograd.grad(match_loss, syn_x)[0]
syn_x.data -= LR * syn_x.grad
return syn_x, syn_y
Self-distillation (LLM)
def self_distill_pipeline(teacher_model, base_student, prompts, n_examples=10000):
"""매 teacher 의 generate → 매 student 의 train."""
# 매 1. teacher 의 generate (with reasoning)
examples = []
for prompt in prompts[:n_examples]:
response = teacher_model.generate(
prompt + "\n\nThink step by step.",
max_tokens=2048,
)
examples.append({'prompt': prompt, 'response': response})
# 매 2. quality filter
examples = filter_quality(examples)
# 매 3. SFT student
train_sft(base_student, examples)
return base_student
LIMA-style curated data
def lima_curate(candidate_dataset, n_keep=1000):
"""매 quality > quantity. 매 careful manual + 매 LLM filter."""
# 매 1. format check
candidates = [c for c in candidate_dataset if format_valid(c)]
# 매 2. quality filter (LLM-as-judge)
scored = []
for c in candidates:
score = llm_quality_judge(c)
scored.append((c, score))
# 매 3. diversity sample
scored.sort(key=lambda x: -x[1])
diverse_top = diverse_sample(scored, n=n_keep) # 매 cluster + 매 1 per cluster
return [c for c, _ in diverse_top]
Synthetic data generation (LLM)
def generate_synthetic_qa(domain, n=10000):
seed_examples = load_seed(domain)
synthetic = []
for _ in range(n):
prompt = f"""Generate a high-quality Q&A pair about {domain}.
Style examples:
{format_examples(seed_examples[:3])}
Output format:
Q: ...
A: ...
Generate a NEW Q&A:"""
result = llm.generate(prompt)
synthetic.append(parse_qa(result))
return synthetic
Compression evaluation
def evaluate_distilled_dataset(distilled, full_test):
"""매 매 architecture 의 evaluate."""
architectures = ['ResNet18', 'VGG11', 'ConvNet']
results = {}
for arch in architectures:
model = create(arch)
train(model, distilled)
results[arch] = evaluate(model, full_test)
return results # 매 cross-arch generalization
Replay buffer compression (continual learning)
class CompressedReplay:
def __init__(self, capacity=100, compression_method='distill'):
self.buffer = []
self.capacity = capacity
self.method = compression_method
def add_task(self, task_data):
if self.method == 'distill':
distilled = dataset_distill(task_data, n_per_class=10)
self.buffer.append(distilled)
else:
# 매 random subsample
self.buffer.append(random.sample(task_data, self.capacity // len(self.buffer)))
Privacy via DP-distillation
def dp_distill(real_data, epsilon=1.0):
"""매 differentially private 의 distill."""
# 매 add noise to gradients
syn_data = init_synthetic()
for step in range(N_STEPS):
grad = compute_gradient_match(syn_data, real_data)
noise = laplace_noise(scale=1/epsilon)
grad_private = grad + noise
syn_data -= LR * grad_private
return syn_data
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Tiny budget | Dataset distillation (Gradient Matching) |
| Small LLM | Self-distillation from frontier |
| Privacy | DP-distillation |
| Continual learning | Compressed replay |
| Quality + small data | LIMA curate |
| Synthetic gen | LLM-driven |
| Edge deploy | Knowledge distill (model) |
기본값: Self-distillation from larger model (LLM era).
🔗 Graph
- 부모: LLM_Optimization_and_Deployment_Strategies
- 변형: Dataset-Distillation · Self-Distillation · Synthetic-Data
- 응용: sLLM · Continual-Learning
- Adjacent: Cross-Entropy Loss · Catastrophic-Forgetting · Computational_Creativity · CV_Synthesis
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 sLLM training. 매 cost-efficient deploy. 매 privacy-sensitive. 매 continual replay. 언제 X: 매 abundant real data + cheap compute.
❌ 안티패턴
- Synthetic only (no real validation): 매 model collapse risk.
- Architecture-specific distill 의 cross-architecture expect: 매 fail.
- No quality filter: 매 noise amplify.
- Frontier 의 imitation 의 commercial use: 매 ToS violation (some).
- DP epsilon 의 too low: 매 utility lose.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Wang 2018 dataset distillation, Hinton 2015 KD, Phi-3 paper, LIMA paper).
- 신뢰도 A.
- Related: Cross-Entropy Loss · Catastrophic-Forgetting · Computational_Creativity · CV_Synthesis · Cost-Benefit Analysis in AI.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — methods + 매 KD / GM / self-distill / LIMA / DP code |