9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
4.7 KiB
4.7 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-social-engineering | Social Engineering | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Social Engineering
매 한 줄
"매 attack 의 weakest link 의 human 의 exploit. Tech-stack 의 hardening 보다 매 human-layer 의 manipulation 가 cheaper.". 매 phishing, vishing, pretexting, baiting 의 family — 매 2026 LLM-generated voice clones / deepfake video 가 매 attack vector 의 industrialize 했음. 매 SOC2 / ISO27001 의 awareness training 의 mandate.
매 핵심
매 attack vectors
- Phishing (email) — bulk credential harvest.
- Spear-phishing — targeted, OSINT-backed.
- Vishing (voice) — 매 LLM voice clone 의 era.
- Smishing (SMS) — package delivery, bank scam.
- Pretexting — impersonation (CEO fraud, IT helpdesk).
- Baiting — USB drop, malicious download.
- Tailgating — physical access.
매 psychological levers (Cialdini)
- Authority (CEO impersonation).
- Urgency ("account locked, act now").
- Scarcity ("last chance").
- Reciprocity ("free gift").
- Social proof ("colleagues already responded").
- Liking (rapport building).
매 응용 (defense)
- MFA (phishing-resistant — FIDO2/passkey).
- SPF/DKIM/DMARC for email auth.
- Awareness training + simulated phishing.
- Approval workflow for wire transfers (out-of-band verify).
- Zero-trust + least-privilege blast radius limit.
💻 패턴
DMARC enforce policy
_dmarc.example.com. TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc@example.com; pct=100"
Phishing simulation framework (gophish API)
import requests
api = "https://gophish.local/api"
headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer TOKEN"}
campaign = {
"name": "Q2 Awareness",
"template": {"name": "Fake-IT-Reset"},
"url": "https://landing.local",
"groups": [{"name": "All-Employees"}],
}
requests.post(f"{api}/campaigns/", json=campaign, headers=headers)
FIDO2 webauthn (phishing-resistant)
const credential = await navigator.credentials.create({
publicKey: {
challenge: serverChallenge,
rp: { name: 'example.com' },
user: { id, name: email, displayName: name },
pubKeyCredParams: [{ alg: -7, type: 'public-key' }],
authenticatorSelection: { userVerification: 'required', authenticatorAttachment: 'platform' },
},
});
Wire-transfer out-of-band verify (Slack bot)
bot.command('/verify-wire', async ({ command, ack }) => {
await ack();
const challenge = generateOTP();
await sms.send(command.user_phone, `Wire verify code: ${challenge}`);
await db.storeChallenge(command.user_id, challenge);
});
Email header anomaly detection
def is_suspicious(msg):
spf = msg.get('Authentication-Results', '')
if 'spf=fail' in spf or 'dkim=fail' in spf:
return True
if msg['From'] != msg['Reply-To']:
return True # display name spoof
return False
Deepfake voice detection (2026 ML)
from transformers import pipeline
detector = pipeline('audio-classification', model='WavLM-deepfake-2026')
result = detector(audio_path)
# returns: [{'label': 'synthetic', 'score': 0.94}, ...]
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Email account compromise risk | DMARC reject + FIDO2 MFA |
| Wire transfer fraud (BEC) | Out-of-band callback verify |
| Voice impersonation | Codeword + callback to known number |
| USB drop | Endpoint policy block autorun |
| Insider awareness | Quarterly simulated phishing |
기본값: FIDO2 passkey + DMARC reject + quarterly training + out-of-band approval for $X+ transfers.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Threat-Modeling · OWASP Top 10
- 변형: Phishing
- 응용: FIDO2 · DMARC · Zero Trust Architecture
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: threat-model human layer, security training content, BEC playbook. 언제 X: 매 actual phishing template generation — abuse risk.
❌ 안티패턴
- SMS-only MFA: SIM-swap vulnerable — FIDO2 prefer.
- Annual training only: 매 retention low — quarterly + simulation.
- Trust caller-ID: 매 trivially spoof — callback to known number.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (NIST SP 800-50, Mitnick "Art of Deception", Verizon DBIR 2025).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — SE attack vectors, Cialdini levers, FIDO2/DMARC defenses |