9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
5.7 KiB
5.7 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-belief-system | Belief System | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.85 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Belief System
매 한 줄
"매 agent 의 'world 가 such-and-such' 의 internal model — 매 perception update · inference 로 부터 의 derive". Bratman 1987 BDI (Belief-Desire-Intention) 의 origin, 2026 의 LLM agent 의 working memory · scratchpad · long-term memory store 의 modern incarnation.
매 핵심
매 component
- Belief base: fact set (logical · probabilistic · embedding-vector).
- Update rule: perception → belief revision (AGM postulates).
- Query interface: 매 plan 의 condition 의 check.
- Consistency check: contradiction 의 detect · resolve.
매 representation
- Symbolic: Prolog · Datalog · OWL/RDF.
- Probabilistic: Bayesian network · Markov logic.
- Vector/embedding: 매 modern LLM agent — chunked text + embedding store.
- Hybrid: structured fact + free-text (most 2026 agent system).
매 응용
- 매 BDI agent (JADE · Jadex · Jason).
- Robot world model (ROS knowledge_base).
- LLM agent scratchpad (Claude · LangGraph state).
💻 패턴
BDI-style belief base (Python)
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Any
@dataclass
class BeliefBase:
facts: dict[str, Any] = field(default_factory=dict)
confidence: dict[str, float] = field(default_factory=dict)
def add(self, key: str, value: Any, conf: float = 1.0):
if key in self.facts and self.facts[key] != value:
# contradiction → keep higher-confidence
if conf <= self.confidence[key]: return
self.facts[key] = value
self.confidence[key] = conf
def query(self, key: str) -> tuple[Any, float] | None:
if key not in self.facts: return None
return self.facts[key], self.confidence[key]
bb = BeliefBase()
bb.add("door_open", True, 0.9)
bb.add("battery_pct", 73, 1.0)
LLM agent: belief 의 prompt-injected scratchpad
def build_prompt(beliefs: BeliefBase, task: str) -> str:
facts = "\n".join(
f"- {k}: {v} (conf={c:.2f})"
for k, (v, c) in [(k, (bb.facts[k], bb.confidence[k])) for k in bb.facts]
)
return f"""You are an agent with the following beliefs:
{facts}
Task: {task}
Plan your next action and explain reasoning."""
Bayesian belief update (sensor fusion)
def bayes_update(prior: float, likelihood: float, evidence: float) -> float:
"""P(H|E) = P(E|H) * P(H) / P(E)"""
return likelihood * prior / evidence
# Door 의 open 의 prior 0.5, sensor 의 reading "open" 의 likelihood 0.9, evidence 0.6
posterior = bayes_update(0.5, 0.9, 0.6) # 0.75
Vector belief store (long-term memory)
import chromadb
client = chromadb.PersistentClient("./agent_memory")
beliefs = client.get_or_create_collection("beliefs")
beliefs.upsert(
ids=["b-001"],
documents=["User prefers vegetarian restaurants in 5km radius"],
metadatas=[{"source": "user_pref_2026-04-12", "conf": 0.95}],
)
hits = beliefs.query(query_texts=["restaurant recommendation"], n_results=5)
Belief revision (AGM contraction)
def contract(bb: BeliefBase, fact: str):
"""Remove fact + minimal additional facts to restore consistency."""
if fact in bb.facts:
del bb.facts[fact]
del bb.confidence[fact]
# Naive — production uses entrenchment ordering
LangGraph stateful belief
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph
from typing import TypedDict
class AgentState(TypedDict):
beliefs: dict
desires: list[str]
intentions: list[str]
def perceive(state: AgentState) -> AgentState:
state["beliefs"]["weather"] = call_weather_api()
return state
graph = StateGraph(AgentState).add_node("perceive", perceive)
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Representation |
|---|---|
| 매 deterministic rule-based | Datalog · Prolog |
| Uncertain sensor data | Bayesian network |
| Open-domain text · LLM agent | Vector embedding + scratchpad |
| Robot · spatial | Probabilistic occupancy grid + KB |
| Multi-agent · negotiation | KQML · FIPA + symbolic KB |
기본값: hybrid — symbolic skeleton (key fact 의 dict) + vector store (free-text long-term).
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Agent Architecture · Knowledge Representation
- 변형: Bayesian_Inference
- Adjacent: A2A · Belief Revision
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: belief base 의 natural-language form 의 store (e.g. user preference summary), scratchpad 의 reasoning step 의 record. 언제 X: 매 safety-critical inference (medical · industrial) — LLM 의 hallucinate · 매 symbolic verifiable 의 require.
❌ 안티패턴
- No revision policy: belief 의 add-only — contradictory state 의 accumulate.
- Confidence 의 ignore: 매 fact 의 binary present/absent — sensor noise 의 not handle.
- Global belief blob: 매 agent 의 share — privacy · ownership 의 unclear → BDI per-agent KB.
- Vector-only memory: 매 deterministic recall (e.g. "what is user's name") 의 unreliable — symbolic key/value 의 mix.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Bratman 1987, AGM 1985, FIPA agent specs, LangGraph docs, ChromaDB docs).
- 신뢰도 A-.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — BDI + 2026 LLM hybrid (vector + symbolic) |