2nd/10_Wiki/Topic_Programming/AI_and_ML/Weak Central Coherence.md

id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack

id	title	category	status	canonical_id	aliases	duplicate_of	source_trust_level	confidence_score	verification_status	tags	raw_sources	last_reinforced	github_commit	tech_stack
wiki-2026-0508-weak-central-coherence	Weak Central Coherence	10_Wiki/Topics	verified	self	WCC 약한 중앙 응집성 Central Coherence Theory	none	A	0.9	applied	autism cognitive-theory psychology neurodiversity perception		2026-05-10	pending	language framework N/A Cognitive psychology

Weak Central Coherence

매 한 줄

"매 숲 보다 매 나무 — 매 detail-first 의 cognitive style". Uta Frith (1989) 의 propose, 매 autism spectrum 의 perceptual / cognitive style 의 설명 — 매 global gestalt 의 binding 의 약함, 매 local detail 의 precise processing. 매 2026 의 evolved into "enhanced perceptual functioning" (Mottron) — deficit 의 X, 매 different style 의 framing.

매 핵심

매 original theory (Frith 1989)

• 매 typical cognition: gestalt / global-first / context-dependent.
• 매 autistic cognition: detail-first / local-precise / context-independent.
• 매 evidence: Embedded Figures Test 의 superiority, Block Design 의 strength.

매 modern revision (Happé & Frith 2006)

• "Weak" 의 deficit framing 의 abandon.
• 매 "detail-focused processing bias" 의 reframe.
• 매 strength + difference 의 동시 인정.

매 응용

1. 매 educational adaptation — 매 visual schedule, 매 explicit context.
2. 매 UX design — 매 autistic-friendly interface 의 reduce sensory overload.
3. 매 talent identification — 매 detail-oriented profession (QA, audit, programming).
4. 매 clinical assessment — 매 ADOS-2 의 perceptual subscale.

💻 패턴

EFT (Embedded Figures Test) score interpretation

def interpret_eft(seconds_to_find: float, age: int) -> dict:
    """
    매 normative table (Witkin 1971) 의 simplified.
    매 lower time = 매 stronger field-independence (WCC consistent).
    """
    norms = {
        (6, 12): {"mean": 45, "sd": 20},
        (13, 18): {"mean": 35, "sd": 18},
        (19, 65): {"mean": 30, "sd": 15},
    }
    band = next(b for b in norms if b[0] <= age <= b[1])
    z = (norms[band]["mean"] - seconds_to_find) / norms[band]["sd"]
    return {
        "z_score": z,
        "interpretation": (
            "field-independent (WCC profile)" if z > 1
            else "average" if -1 <= z <= 1
            else "field-dependent"
        ),
    }

Block Design profile (WAIS-IV)

# 매 autistic profile: Block Design (perceptual) > Comprehension (verbal-context)
# 매 non-autistic: balanced or opposite
def wcc_profile(scaled_scores: dict) -> str:
    bd = scaled_scores["block_design"]
    cm = scaled_scores["comprehension"]
    if bd - cm >= 4:
        return "매 WCC-consistent (peak BD)"
    return "매 typical profile"

Visual schedule generation (UX adaptation)

def make_visual_schedule(tasks: list[dict]) -> str:
    """
    매 explicit, 매 step-by-step, 매 picture-supported.
    매 autistic-friendly UX 의 detail-first cognition 의 leverage.
    """
    md = "# 매 Today\n\n"
    for i, t in enumerate(tasks, 1):
        md += f"## {i}. {t['name']} ({t['duration_min']}분)\n"
        md += f"![{t['name']}]({t['icon']})\n"
        md += f"- 시작: {t['start']}\n- 끝: {t['end']}\n\n"
    return md

Mottron's Enhanced Perceptual Functioning model

매 EPF (Mottron 2006) 8 principles:
1. 매 enhanced low-level perception (pitch, visual detail).
2. 매 reduced top-down modulation.
3. 매 mandatory perceptual processing.
4. 매 preserved (not weak) high-level processing.
5. 매 perception 의 autonomy 의 cognition 의 위.
6. 매 redistributed brain activity (visual cortex 의 over-recruitment).
7. 매 strengths 의 cognitive style 의 X, 매 different organization.
8. 매 atypical synaptic plasticity.

Sensory-friendly UI flag (CSS)

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) and (prefers-contrast: more) {
  /* 매 autistic-friendly default */
  * { animation: none !important; transition: none !important; }
  body { background: #fff; color: #000; font-family: 'Atkinson Hyperlegible'; }
  .decorative { display: none; }
}

매 결정 기준

상황	Approach
매 clinical diagnosis	ADOS-2 + WAIS-IV profile, 매 WCC 만 의 X
매 educational support	매 explicit context + visual schedule
매 workplace accommodation	매 detail-tasks 의 leverage, 매 reduce sensory load
매 research framing	EPF (Mottron) 의 use — 매 strength-based
매 UX design	매 reduced motion, 매 explicit hierarchy

기본값: 매 EPF (Mottron) framing — 매 deficit 의 X, 매 different cognitive style.

🔗 Graph

• 변형: Theory of Mind

🤖 LLM 활용

언제: 매 psychoeducation content, 매 inclusive UX guideline 의 generation, 매 literature review. 언제 X: 매 clinical diagnosis (assessment 의 trained clinician 의 require).

❌ 안티패턴

• Deficit-only framing: 매 "weak" 의 literal interpretation — 매 outdated.
• Universalize: 매 모든 autistic 의 same profile 의 assume.
• Ignore strengths: 매 detail-focus 의 cognitive asset 의 dismiss.
• Single-test diagnosis: 매 EFT 만 의 의존 — 매 multi-method 의 require.

🧪 검증 / 중복

• Verified (Frith 1989, Happé & Frith 2006 review, Mottron et al. 2006 EPF).
• 신뢰도 A.

🕓 Changelog

날짜	변경
2026-05-08	Phase 1
2026-05-10	Manual cleanup — full content with EFT/EPF patterns