9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
5.8 KiB
5.8 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-similarity-metrics-in-ai | Similarity Metrics in AI | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Similarity Metrics in AI
매 한 줄
"매 similarity 의 metric choice 는 매 retrieval / clustering / matching quality 의 결정". 매 cosine 의 dominant 의 dense embedding semantic search, 매 Jaccard 의 set overlap, 매 edit distance 의 string fuzzy matching. 매 2026 의 modern stack 의 normalized cosine + ANN (HNSW/IVF-PQ) 의 standard.
매 핵심
매 Vector metrics
- Cosine similarity:
dot(a,b) / (||a|| * ||b||)— 매 magnitude-invariant. 매 embedding 의 default. - Dot product: 매 normalized embedding 의 cosine 과 equivalent. 매 faster (no division).
- Euclidean (L2): 매 raw distance. 매 cluster centroid / k-means 의 use.
- Manhattan (L1): 매 robust to outliers. 매 sparse feature 의 use.
매 Set / String metrics
- Jaccard:
|A ∩ B| / |A ∪ B|— 매 set / token overlap. - Levenshtein (edit distance): 매 character-level fuzzy match.
- Hamming: 매 fixed-length binary / hash 의 distance.
- Tanimoto: 매 chemistry / fingerprint similarity.
매 응용
- Semantic search — sentence-transformer embedding + cosine + FAISS HNSW.
- Deduplication — MinHash + Jaccard 의 near-duplicate detection.
- Recommendation — user/item embedding cosine.
- Fuzzy matching — record linkage 의 Levenshtein / Jaro-Winkler.
💻 패턴
Cosine similarity (numpy)
import numpy as np
def cosine_sim(a: np.ndarray, b: np.ndarray) -> float:
return float(np.dot(a, b) / (np.linalg.norm(a) * np.linalg.norm(b) + 1e-12))
def cosine_matrix(A: np.ndarray, B: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
A_n = A / (np.linalg.norm(A, axis=1, keepdims=True) + 1e-12)
B_n = B / (np.linalg.norm(B, axis=1, keepdims=True) + 1e-12)
return A_n @ B_n.T
Sentence embedding + FAISS (2026 stack)
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
import faiss
import numpy as np
model = SentenceTransformer("BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5")
docs = ["alpha doc", "beta doc", "gamma doc"]
emb = model.encode(docs, normalize_embeddings=True).astype("float32")
index = faiss.IndexHNSWFlat(emb.shape[1], 32)
index.metric_type = faiss.METRIC_INNER_PRODUCT # cosine via normalized
index.add(emb)
q = model.encode(["alpha"], normalize_embeddings=True).astype("float32")
D, I = index.search(q, k=3)
Jaccard via MinHash (datasketch)
from datasketch import MinHash, MinHashLSH
def mh(tokens, num_perm=128):
m = MinHash(num_perm=num_perm)
for t in tokens:
m.update(t.encode("utf-8"))
return m
lsh = MinHashLSH(threshold=0.7, num_perm=128)
lsh.insert("doc1", mh("the quick brown fox".split()))
lsh.insert("doc2", mh("the quick brown dog".split()))
print(lsh.query(mh("the quick brown fox jumps".split())))
Levenshtein (rapidfuzz)
from rapidfuzz.distance import Levenshtein
from rapidfuzz import fuzz, process
print(Levenshtein.distance("kitten", "sitting")) # 3
print(fuzz.ratio("apple inc.", "apple, inc")) # ~95
choices = ["Acme Corp", "Apple Inc.", "Microsoft"]
print(process.extractOne("aple", choices, scorer=fuzz.ratio))
Euclidean vs cosine (when matters)
# Cosine: angle only — magnitude ignored
a = np.array([1.0, 0.0]); b = np.array([10.0, 0.0])
# cosine(a,b) = 1.0 (identical direction)
# euclidean(a,b) = 9.0 (very different magnitude)
Hybrid retrieval (BM25 + dense)
# 매 modern RAG 의 default — sparse + dense fusion
from rank_bm25 import BM25Okapi
import numpy as np
tokenized = [d.split() for d in docs]
bm25 = BM25Okapi(tokenized)
sparse_scores = bm25.get_scores("alpha doc".split())
dense_scores = (emb @ q.T).flatten()
# Reciprocal Rank Fusion
def rrf(rankings, k=60):
scores = {}
for ranking in rankings:
for rank, doc_id in enumerate(ranking):
scores[doc_id] = scores.get(doc_id, 0) + 1 / (k + rank)
return sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1])
Tanimoto (binary fingerprint)
def tanimoto(a: np.ndarray, b: np.ndarray) -> float:
inter = np.sum(a & b)
union = np.sum(a | b)
return inter / union if union else 0.0
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Dense embedding | Cosine (or normalized dot) |
| K-means / GMM | Euclidean |
| Token / set overlap | Jaccard |
| String fuzzy match | Levenshtein / Jaro-Winkler |
| Binary fingerprint | Hamming / Tanimoto |
| Large-scale ANN | HNSW (cosine) or IVF-PQ |
기본값: normalized embedding + cosine + HNSW.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Embeddings · Vector-Search
- 응용: Semantic Search · Deduplication · RAG
- Adjacent: Sentence-Transformers · FAISS
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: semantic similarity, paraphrase detection, dedup of LLM outputs, eval (semantic equivalence). 언제 X: exact match required, ordinal / numeric distance — use direct comparison.
❌ 안티패턴
- Unnormalized cosine: 매 forgetting normalization → magnitude bias.
- L2 on sparse high-D: 매 curse of dimensionality — cosine more robust.
- Single metric: 매 hybrid (sparse + dense) 의 better recall.
- Brute force at scale: >1M vectors 의 ANN required.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (FAISS docs, sentence-transformers, rapidfuzz).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — full content with metric patterns + hybrid retrieval |