9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
6.1 KiB
6.1 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-predictive-analytics | Predictive Analytics | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Predictive Analytics
매 한 줄
"매 historical data 로 future outcomes 예측 — regression, classification, time series 의 union". 1990s statistics 에서 출발해 2010s ML 으로 mainstream, 2026 currently transformer-based forecasting (TimesFM, Chronos) 이 tabular 와 sequence 에서 공존. Business intelligence, supply chain, churn, fraud 의 매 backbone.
매 핵심
매 problem types
- Regression: continuous target (revenue, demand, price).
- Classification: discrete label (churn yes/no, fraud type).
- Time series: temporally indexed (sales, sensor, stock).
- Survival: time-to-event (customer lifetime, equipment failure).
- Ranking: ordering items (recommendation, search).
매 modern stack (2026)
- Tabular: XGBoost / LightGBM / CatBoost — 매 still SOTA on most tabular.
- Deep tabular: TabPFN v2, FT-Transformer — 매 zero-shot tabular foundation.
- Time series: Chronos (Amazon), TimesFM (Google), Moirai — 매 pretrained TS foundation models.
- Classic TS: Prophet, statsforecast (AutoARIMA, ETS) — 매 baseline.
매 workflow
- EDA + feature engineering.
- Train/val/test split (temporal for TS).
- Model selection + CV.
- Hyperparameter tuning (Optuna).
- Calibration + interpretability (SHAP).
- Deployment + monitoring (drift detection).
💻 패턴
XGBoost regression baseline
import xgboost as xgb
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
from sklearn.metrics import mean_absolute_error
import numpy as np
X, y = load_data()
kf = KFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
scores = []
for tr, va in kf.split(X):
model = xgb.XGBRegressor(
n_estimators=2000, learning_rate=0.03, max_depth=6,
subsample=0.8, colsample_bytree=0.8,
early_stopping_rounds=50, eval_metric="mae",
)
model.fit(X.iloc[tr], y.iloc[tr], eval_set=[(X.iloc[va], y.iloc[va])], verbose=False)
scores.append(mean_absolute_error(y.iloc[va], model.predict(X.iloc[va])))
print(f"CV MAE: {np.mean(scores):.4f} +/- {np.std(scores):.4f}")
LightGBM classification w/ early stopping
import lightgbm as lgb
model = lgb.LGBMClassifier(
n_estimators=5000, learning_rate=0.02, num_leaves=63,
min_child_samples=20, reg_alpha=0.1, reg_lambda=0.1,
)
model.fit(
X_tr, y_tr,
eval_set=[(X_va, y_va)],
callbacks=[lgb.early_stopping(100), lgb.log_evaluation(0)],
)
proba = model.predict_proba(X_te)[:, 1]
Time series with TimesFM (foundation model, zero-shot)
import timesfm
tfm = timesfm.TimesFm(
hparams=timesfm.TimesFmHparams(backend="gpu", per_core_batch_size=32),
checkpoint=timesfm.TimesFmCheckpoint(huggingface_repo_id="google/timesfm-2.0-500m"),
)
forecast, _ = tfm.forecast(
inputs=[history_series], # list of np.array
freq=[0], # 0=high freq, 1=med, 2=low
horizon_len=96,
)
Prophet (interpretable seasonality)
from prophet import Prophet
m = Prophet(yearly_seasonality=True, weekly_seasonality=True, changepoint_prior_scale=0.05)
m.add_country_holidays(country_name="US")
m.fit(df) # df with ds, y columns
future = m.make_future_dataframe(periods=90)
fcst = m.predict(future) # yhat, yhat_lower, yhat_upper
SHAP explainability
import shap
explainer = shap.TreeExplainer(model)
shap_values = explainer.shap_values(X_te)
shap.summary_plot(shap_values, X_te)
shap.waterfall_plot(shap.Explanation(values=shap_values[0], base_values=explainer.expected_value, data=X_te.iloc[0]))
Probability calibration
from sklearn.calibration import CalibratedClassifierCV
calibrated = CalibratedClassifierCV(base_model, method="isotonic", cv="prefit")
calibrated.fit(X_va, y_va)
# Brier score + reliability diagram on test
Drift monitoring (Evidently)
from evidently.report import Report
from evidently.metric_preset import DataDriftPreset
report = Report(metrics=[DataDriftPreset()])
report.run(reference_data=X_train, current_data=X_prod)
report.save_html("drift.html")
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Tabular, <1M rows | XGBoost / LightGBM |
| Tabular, mixed features | CatBoost |
| Zero-shot tabular | TabPFN v2 |
| Time series, single series | Prophet / AutoARIMA |
| Time series, many series, zero-shot | Chronos / TimesFM |
| Need interpretability | Linear / GAM + SHAP |
| Very large (>10M) tabular | LightGBM w/ histogram |
기본값: LightGBM + Optuna + SHAP for tabular; Chronos zero-shot for new TS problems.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Machine-Learning · Statistics
- 변형: Time-Series-Analysis · Regression
- Adjacent: XGBoost · LightGBM · SHAP · Prophet
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: business outcome forecasting, risk scoring, demand planning, anomaly detection 의 supervised learning. 언제 X: causal inference (use Causal-Inference), prescriptive optimization (use Optimization).
❌ 안티패턴
- Data leakage: 매 future info in training features — invalidates evaluation.
- Random split on time series: must use temporal split.
- Ignoring calibration: probabilities used for decisions but never calibrated.
- No drift monitoring: model decays silently in production.
- Over-engineering deep nets for small tabular: GBDT wins under 100k rows.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Kaggle Grandmaster patterns, Amazon Chronos paper 2024, Google TimesFM 2024).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — full predictive analytics workflow with 2026 foundation models |