9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
5.3 KiB
5.3 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-parameter | Parameter | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.95 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Parameter
매 한 줄
"매 learned by data vs set by human". Parameter = model 이 training 중 학습 (weight, bias). Hyperparameter = 매 human 이 사전 설정 (lr, depth, batch size). 2026 frontier: 매 trillion-parameter models (GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.7) — 매 scale 의 dominant axis.
매 핵심
매 parameter vs hyperparameter
- Parameter (θ): 매 trainable, gradient descent 의 update target. Examples: W, b in
y = Wx + b. - Hyperparameter: 매 fixed before training, 매 architecture/optim choice. Examples: learning rate, batch size, num_layers, dropout p.
- 매 distinction 모호 case: prompt token (soft prompt 시 parameter, hard prompt 시 input).
매 parameter types
- Weights: matrix multiply coefficients (
WinWx + b). - Biases: additive offsets (
b). - Embeddings: lookup table (vocab × dim).
- LayerNorm γ, β: scale/shift learned per channel.
- Buffers: 매 NOT params — running statistics (BatchNorm running_mean), moving averages.
매 modern scale
- BERT-base (2018): 110M.
- GPT-3 (2020): 175B.
- GPT-4 (2023): ~1.7T (rumored MoE).
- Llama 3.1 405B (2024): 405B dense.
- GPT-5 / Claude Opus 4.7 (2025-2026): trillion-scale, MoE common.
- 매 active params (MoE) ≠ total params.
매 응용
- Model size estimation (memory budget).
- Compute budget (Chinchilla scaling: tokens ≈ 20× params).
- Compression (quantization, pruning operate on params).
- Fine-tuning scope (full vs PEFT — see PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning)).
💻 패턴
Count parameters
def count_params(model):
total = sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters())
trainable = sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters() if p.requires_grad)
return total, trainable
total, trainable = count_params(model)
print(f"Total: {total/1e9:.2f}B, Trainable: {trainable/1e9:.2f}B")
Parameter vs buffer
import torch.nn as nn
class MyLayer(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.weight = nn.Parameter(torch.randn(10, 10)) # trainable
self.register_buffer("running_mean", torch.zeros(10)) # NOT trainable
Freeze parameters (transfer learning)
for p in model.encoder.parameters():
p.requires_grad = False # frozen
# Only classifier head trains
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(
[p for p in model.parameters() if p.requires_grad], lr=1e-4
)
Memory estimation
def model_memory_gb(model, dtype_bytes=2): # bf16
n = sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters())
weights = n * dtype_bytes
gradients = n * dtype_bytes # if training
optimizer = n * 8 # Adam: 2 states × fp32
return (weights + gradients + optimizer) / 1e9
print(f"Training memory: {model_memory_gb(model):.1f} GB")
Hyperparameter search (Optuna)
import optuna
def objective(trial):
lr = trial.suggest_float("lr", 1e-5, 1e-2, log=True)
bs = trial.suggest_categorical("batch_size", [32, 64, 128])
layers = trial.suggest_int("num_layers", 2, 8)
return train_and_eval(lr=lr, batch_size=bs, num_layers=layers)
study = optuna.create_study(direction="maximize")
study.optimize(objective, n_trials=50)
MoE active params
# Mixtral 8x7B: 47B total, ~13B active per token (top-2 routing)
total = 47e9
experts = 8
active_per_token = 2
shared = 13e9 - (47e9 - 13e9*experts) / experts # rough
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Memory budget plan | Total params × dtype × (1 train, 4 with optim) |
| Inference deployment | Total params × dtype (+ KV cache) |
| Scaling decision | Chinchilla: tokens ≈ 20 × params |
| Compute budget | FLOPs ≈ 6 × params × tokens |
| Fine-tuning | PEFT if params > 1B and 1-GPU |
기본값: 매 always report total + trainable params separately.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Machine-Learning
- 변형: Trainable-Parameter
- 응용: LLM_Optimization_and_Deployment_Strategies · PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning) · LLM_Optimization_and_Deployment_Strategies
- Adjacent: Scaling-Laws · MoE
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 model size discussion, memory planning, fine-tuning scope decision. 언제 X: 매 high-level user-facing communication (use "model size" instead).
❌ 안티패턴
- Confusing param ≠ hyperparam: 매 calling
lra parameter. - Counting frozen as trainable: 매 reporting 70B "trainable" when only LoRA (0.5%) actually trains.
- Ignoring MoE active vs total: 매 Mixtral 47B treated as 47B compute (실제 13B per token).
- Memory underestimation: 매 forgetting optimizer states (8× param size for Adam fp32).
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (PyTorch docs, Kaplan 2020 / Hoffmann 2022 scaling laws).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — parameter vs hyperparameter, modern scale, memory math |