9148c358d0
Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics/Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/Topics_Rag의 마크다운 지식 문서를 Topic_General/Topic_Programming/Topic_Graphic/Topic_Business 4개 카테고리로 재분류. - 중복 제거: frontmatter의 status:duplicate/merged + duplicate_of/redirect_to 필드로 자기 자신을 중복으로 선언한 리다이렉트 stub 1032개 제거, 완전 동일 내용 파일 472개 제거, 동일 파일명·다른 내용 충돌 시 더 큰(완전한) 버전만 유지(162개 제거) — 총 1639개 중복 제거. - 분류: 폴더 단위로 명확한 항목(AI_and_ML/Coding/Architecture 등 → Programming, Comfyui/Visual_Effects → Graphic, Topics_Biz/Topics_Meeting/사업 등 → Business, Poetic_Blog_Writing/창의성/Game_Design 등 → General)은 폴더 우선순위로, 나머지 혼재 폴더(Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics 루트/Thinking & Reasoning/Other/UI_UX_Assets)는 title/tags 키워드 스코어링으로 파일 단위 분류(불명확한 경우 General로 폴백). 원본 폴더명은 "From_*" 서브폴더로 보존해 추적 가능성 유지. - 최종 배치: Programming 2784 / General 1608 / Graphic 285 / Business 249 = 4926개 문서. - 에이전트 운영 상태(.astra/.agent/.obsidian/sessions/memory/_company/docs/lessons/_shared/src)는 지식 콘텐츠가 아니므로 재분류 대상에서 제외하고 원위치 유지. - Topics/Topic_email(상위 보호 폴더 Topic_email과 파일명 100% 중복) 삭제 — 보호 폴더 자체는 미변경. - 완전히 비게 된 Topic_Agent/Topic_Blog/Topics_Biz/Topics_Rag 폴더 제거.
6.8 KiB
6.8 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-improvisation | Improvisation | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | B | 0.85 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Improvisation
매 한 줄
"매 plan 의 die 매 first contact, 매 improv 매 take over". Improvisation 매 real-time adaptive decision-making 매 incomplete information 매 unfolding situation. 2026 LLM agents 매 nontrivial improv capability 의 exhibit — 매 tool failure / unexpected output 의 recover 가능.
매 핵심
매 Components of improv
- Situation awareness: 매 current state 의 fast read.
- Repertoire: 매 prelearned moves / patterns.
- Risk gauge: 매 reversible vs irreversible 의 distinguish.
- Commitment: 매 hesitation 의 X — 매 decide 의 act.
매 Plan vs Improv spectrum
- Pure plan: scripted, deterministic, fragile.
- Plan + improv: skeleton plan + adaptive details (best for most tasks).
- Pure improv: jazz solo, emergency response.
- 매 majority production system 매 plan-with-improv-edges.
매 LLM agent improvisation
- 매 tool returns unexpected error → reformulate vs fail.
- 매 user gives ambiguous instruction → ask vs guess vs proceed.
- 매 token budget 매 exhaust → compress vs truncate vs delegate.
매 응용
- Incident response (production outage).
- Live coding session (pair programming).
- LLM agent error recovery.
- Customer support edge cases.
💻 패턴
Pattern 1: Repertoire of moves
from typing import Callable
class ImprovKit:
"""매 prelearned moves — 매 situation 의 match 의 dispatch."""
def __init__(self):
self.moves: dict[str, Callable] = {}
def register(self, situation: str, move: Callable):
self.moves[situation] = move
def respond(self, context: dict):
for situation, move in self.moves.items():
if matches(situation, context):
return move(context)
return self.default_move(context)
def default_move(self, context):
return {"action": "ask_for_clarification"}
Pattern 2: Reversibility check before commit
def is_reversible(action: dict) -> bool:
irreversible = {"delete_file", "send_email", "db_drop", "git_push_force"}
return action["type"] not in irreversible
def improv_decide(action: dict, confidence: float) -> str:
if is_reversible(action):
return "act" # 매 try 의 cheap
if confidence > 0.95:
return "act"
return "pause_and_verify"
Pattern 3: LLM error recovery loop
def call_with_improv(client, prompt: str, max_retries: int = 3):
history = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-7",
max_tokens=2000,
messages=history,
)
except RateLimitError:
time.sleep(2 ** attempt)
except OverloadedError:
# 매 fallback 매 smaller model
return client.messages.create(
model="claude-haiku-4-7",
max_tokens=2000,
messages=history,
)
except Exception as e:
history.append({
"role": "user",
"content": f"Previous attempt errored: {e}. Try a different approach.",
})
raise RuntimeError("매 improv 의 exhaust")
Pattern 4: Yes-and (improv principle)
def yes_and(user_input: str, context: dict) -> str:
"""매 improv 'Yes, and' — accept premise, build on it."""
return f"Acknowledged: {user_input}. Building on this: {extend(user_input, context)}."
# 매 LLM system prompt 의 embed:
SYSTEM = """매 user 매 partial information 의 give. 매 yes-and 의 follow:
1. Accept what they said as fact (yes).
2. Add useful structure (and).
3. Avoid 'no, that's wrong' unless 매 hard contradiction."""
Pattern 5: Bounded improv (safety rail)
class BoundedImprov:
def __init__(self, max_actions: int = 5, allowed_ops: set = None):
self.max_actions = max_actions
self.allowed_ops = allowed_ops or {"read", "search", "summarize"}
self.actions_taken = 0
def attempt(self, op: str, *args):
if self.actions_taken >= self.max_actions:
raise RuntimeError("매 budget exceed — escalate 의 human")
if op not in self.allowed_ops:
raise PermissionError(f"매 {op} 매 not in improv allowlist")
self.actions_taken += 1
return execute(op, *args)
Pattern 6: Postmortem of improv
def improv_log_entry(situation: str, move: str, outcome: str) -> dict:
return {
"ts": time.time(),
"situation": situation,
"move_chosen": move,
"outcome": outcome,
"would_repeat": outcome in ("success", "partial_success"),
"alternatives_considered": [],
}
# 매 weekly review 매 add successful patterns 의 ImprovKit.
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Reversible action, < 1min | Pure improv. |
| Irreversible, high stakes | Plan first — improv 의 X. |
| Ambiguous user request | Yes-and + clarifying question. |
| LLM tool error | Bounded retry + reformulation. |
| Production incident | Plan (runbook) + improv on edges. |
기본값: 매 80/20 — 80% plan, 20% improv 매 unforeseen edges. 매 irreversible 매 strict plan only.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Decision-Making
- 응용: Pair-Programming
- Adjacent: Risk_Management · Bounded_Rationality
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: Tool error recovery, ambiguous user input handling, edge cases not covered by training data, multi-turn agent self-correction. 언제 X: Compliance-critical workflow (deterministic pipeline only), safety-critical irreversible action.
❌ 안티패턴
- Improv on irreversible action: 매 prod DB drop 의 wing 의 X.
- No repertoire: 매 from-scratch every situation — slow + inconsistent.
- No reversibility check: 매 acted 매 then-realized too late.
- Ego improv: refuse 의 ask for help — 매 stuck-but-improv-ing.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified: Keith Johnstone "Impro" (1979), Karl Weick "Organizing for Reliability" (1987), OODA loop (Boyd).
- 신뢰도 B (academic-soft + applied agentic literature).
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — full content with LLM agent improv patterns and reversibility framework |