c24165b8bc
에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게 [공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류. 문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인). - Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존) - Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design - Topic_Business → Domain_Product - Topic_General → Domain_General - _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning), Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing) - 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서) - 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures) - 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.9 KiB
6.9 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-axioms | Axioms | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.93 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Axioms
📌 한 줄 통찰
"매 의심 없는 지식 의 시작". 매 self-evident or 매 agreed. 매 모든 reasoning 의 ground. 매 wrong axiom = 매 정교한 logic 의 collapse. 매 modern AI 의 Constitutional AI = 매 axiom 의 hardcode.
📖 핵심
매 정의
- 매 logical reasoning 의 premise.
- 매 prove X (within the system).
- 매 derived 의 X.
- 매 system 의 closure 의 base.
매 type
- Self-evident: 매 universal intuition. (예: A = A)
- Defined / postulated: 매 system 의 convention. (예: 평행선 공리)
- Empirical (科學): 매 experiment-based.
- Practical / regulative: 매 useful 의 assume.
매 famous axiom system
Euclid (geometry, 300 BC)
- 매 두 point 의 line.
- 매 line 의 extend.
- 매 center + radius 의 circle.
- 매 right angle 의 equal.
- 매 parallel postulate (controversial → 비유클리드).
Peano (natural numbers, 1889)
- 0 ∈ ℕ.
- n ∈ ℕ → S(n) ∈ ℕ.
- S 의 injective.
- 0 ∉ range(S).
- Induction.
ZFC (set theory, modern)
- Extensionality, Pairing, Union, Power, Infinity, Replacement, Foundation, Choice.
Kolmogorov (probability)
- P(A) ≥ 0.
- P(Ω) = 1.
- Countable additivity.
Field axioms (algebra)
- Associativity, commutativity, distributivity, identity, inverse.
매 limitation
Gödel (1931)
- 매 sufficient axiom system 의 매 incomplete (true 가 prove X) or 매 inconsistent.
- 매 self-reference 의 fundamental.
매 axiom 의 의 choice
- 매 different axiom → 매 different math.
- 매 Euclidean vs 매 non-Euclidean.
- 매 ZFC vs 매 ZF + AD.
매 First Principles Thinking
- 매 Aristotle / Descartes / Musk.
- 매 base 의 break.
- 매 reason from scratch.
- vs analogy / convention.
→ 매 reduce → 매 axiom → 매 rebuild.
매 AI 의 응용
Constitutional AI (Anthropic)
- 매 axiom 의 model 의 hardcode.
- 매 "be helpful, harmless, honest".
- 매 principle 의 critique + revise.
Asimov's Laws (fiction)
- 매 robot 의 3 law (+ 0).
- 매 simple 가, 매 conflict.
Formal verification
- 매 axiom + 매 inference rule → 매 theorem.
- 매 Lean / Coq.
Ontology
- 매 RDF / OWL.
- 매 axiom = 매 inference rule.
매 design 의 axiom (engineering)
- DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
- YAGNI: You Aren't Gonna Need It.
- KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid.
- SOLID (5 axiom).
- 매 universal X 가, 매 useful guideline.
💻 패턴
Constitutional AI principles (Anthropic style)
constitution = [
"Choose the response that is most helpful, honest, and harmless.",
"Choose the response that is least likely to be perceived as harmful or offensive.",
"Choose the response that is most truthful and avoids speculation.",
"Choose the response that respects autonomy and dignity.",
"Choose the response that protects privacy.",
]
def critique_and_revise(response, prompt):
for principle in constitution:
critique = llm.generate(f"""Given:
Prompt: {prompt}
Response: {response}
Principle: {principle}
Critique the response according to the principle.""")
if critique.has_issue():
response = llm.generate(f"""Revise the response to address: {critique}""")
return response
Lean axiom
-- 매 Peano arithmetic 의 axiom
axiom Nat : Type
axiom zero : Nat
axiom succ : Nat → Nat
axiom succ_inj : ∀ a b, succ a = succ b → a = b
axiom zero_ne_succ : ∀ n, zero ≠ succ n
axiom induction : ∀ (P : Nat → Prop),
P zero → (∀ n, P n → P (succ n)) → ∀ n, P n
First principles (Musk style)
Problem: 매 batteries are too expensive.
Conventional reasoning: 매 lithium battery 의 $X / kWh.
First principles:
1. 매 battery = 매 cobalt + nickel + aluminum + carbon + polymer + steel.
2. 매 commodity price 의 sum = $80 / kWh.
3. 매 manufacturing markup = $X.
4. → 매 actual minimum.
Z3 with axioms
from z3 import *
# 매 axiom: 매 모든 person has a parent.
Person = DeclareSort('Person')
parent = Function('parent', Person, Person)
s = Solver()
x = Const('x', Person)
s.add(ForAll([x], Exists([parent(x)], True)))
# 매 query
y = Const('y', Person)
s.push()
s.add(parent(y) == y) # 매 self-parent X?
print(s.check()) # sat / unsat
s.pop()
Formal property check
# 매 axiom: 매 transaction 의 atomicity
ATOMICITY = '∀ tx. completed(tx) ⟺ all_steps(tx) ∨ no_steps(tx)'
def verify_axiom(system, axiom):
return formal_verifier.check(system, axiom)
Axiom-based fairness
# 매 axiom: 매 protected attribute 의 swap → prediction 의 same
def counterfactual_axiom_check(model, x, protected_idx):
flipped = x.copy()
flipped[protected_idx] = 1 - flipped[protected_idx]
return model.predict(x) == model.predict(flipped)
🤔 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| Math research | ZFC / type theory |
| AI alignment | Constitutional axioms |
| Formal verify | Lean / Coq |
| Engineering design | SOLID + KISS + YAGNI |
| Innovation | First principles |
| Fairness | Counterfactual axiom |
| Knowledge graph | Ontology axiom (OWL) |
기본값: 매 axiom 의 explicit. 매 implicit assumption 의 surface.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Logic
- 변형: Postulate
- 응용: AI_Safety_and_Alignment · Formal-Verification · Ontology
- Adjacent: Coq · ZFC · Peano
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 reasoning 의 base 의 surface. 매 AI alignment 설계. 매 formal verify. 매 first principles 의 problem 의 break. 언제 X: 매 axiom 의 dogma 의 mistake. 매 specific 시 의 axiom 의 universal claim.
❌ 안티패턴
- Hidden axiom: 매 implicit 의 inconsistent.
- Too many axiom: 매 system 의 complex.
- Inconsistent axiom: 매 anything provable (ex falso).
- No falsifiability (empirical): 매 dogma.
- Asimov 의 simple 의 imitate: 매 conflict.
- Constitution 의 vague: 매 enforcement X.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Euclid, Peano, ZFC, Anthropic Constitutional AI paper).
- 신뢰도 A.
- Related: Formal-Verification · AI_Safety_and_Alignment · First-Principles-Thinking · Lean-4.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — system + Gödel + Constitutional AI + 매 Lean / Z3 / first principles |