c24165b8bc
에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게 [공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류. 문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인). - Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존) - Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design - Topic_Business → Domain_Product - Topic_General → Domain_General - _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning), Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing) - 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서) - 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures) - 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.9 KiB
4.9 KiB
id, title, category, status, canonical_id, aliases, duplicate_of, source_trust_level, confidence_score, verification_status, tags, raw_sources, last_reinforced, github_commit, tech_stack
| id | title | category | status | canonical_id | aliases | duplicate_of | source_trust_level | confidence_score | verification_status | tags | raw_sources | last_reinforced | github_commit | tech_stack | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wiki-2026-0508-pull-up-method | Pull Up Method | 10_Wiki/Topics | verified | self |
|
none | A | 0.9 | applied |
|
2026-05-10 | pending |
|
Pull Up Method
매 한 줄
"매 duplicated method 매 sibling subclasses 안 — 매 superclass 로 hoist". Fowler의 Refactoring (1999, 2nd ed 2018) 매 catalog item. 매 Extract Superclass / Replace Inheritance with Delegation 와 매 짝.
매 핵심
매 trigger
- 매 두 개 이상 sibling subclass 가 매 identical (or near-identical) method body 보유.
- 매 fields 도 같이 pull up 가능 —
Pull Up Field. - 매 constructor body 도 —
Pull Up Constructor Body.
매 mechanics
- 매 step 1: 매 method bodies 매 inspect — 매 truly identical 인지.
- 매 step 2: 매 differences 매 parameterize — 매 identical 로 만들기.
- 매 step 3: 매 superclass 매 method 작성, 매 subclasses 매 method 삭제.
- 매 step 4: 매 test — 매 polymorphic dispatch 매 correct 인지.
매 응용
- ORM entity hierarchy — 매
BaseEntity매id,createdAtpull up. - UI component class hierarchy — 매 common rendering logic.
- Service layer — 매 audit/logging method pull up.
💻 패턴
Java — Pull Up Method
// Before
class Salesman extends Employee {
String getName() { return name; }
}
class Engineer extends Employee {
String getName() { return name; }
}
// After
class Employee {
protected String name;
String getName() { return name; }
}
class Salesman extends Employee {}
class Engineer extends Employee {}
Pull Up Field
// Before
class Salesman extends Employee {
private String name;
}
class Engineer extends Employee {
private String name;
}
// After
class Employee {
protected String name;
}
Pull Up Constructor Body
class Employee {
protected String name;
protected Employee(String name) { this.name = name; }
}
class Manager extends Employee {
private int grade;
Manager(String name, int grade) {
super(name); // pulled up
this.grade = grade;
}
}
Python — pull up via ABC
from abc import ABC
class Shape(ABC):
def describe(self) -> str:
return f"Shape with area {self.area():.2f}"
class Circle(Shape):
def __init__(self, r): self.r = r
def area(self): return 3.14159 * self.r ** 2
class Square(Shape):
def __init__(self, s): self.s = s
def area(self): return self.s ** 2
TypeScript — abstract class
abstract class Animal {
constructor(protected name: string) {}
describe(): string { // pulled up from Dog/Cat
return `${this.name} is a ${this.constructor.name}`;
}
abstract makeSound(): string;
}
class Dog extends Animal { makeSound() { return "Woof"; } }
class Cat extends Animal { makeSound() { return "Meow"; } }
Refactoring with parameterization
// Before — almost identical
class A { int charge() { return base * 1.05; } }
class B { int charge() { return base * 1.10; } }
// Step: parameterize
class A extends Billing { int charge() { return calc(1.05); } }
class B extends Billing { int charge() { return calc(1.10); } }
// Pull up
class Billing { protected int calc(double rate) { return base * rate; } }
매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| 매 identical method 매 2+ sibling | Pull Up Method |
| 매 similar but different method | Form Template Method 먼저 |
| 매 only 1 subclass uses | Don't pull up |
| 매 deep inheritance (>3 levels) | Composition 고려 |
| 매 LSP 위반 risk | Don't — Extract Class instead |
기본값: 매 2+ siblings 매 identical body — Pull Up. 매 그 외 — composition.
🔗 Graph
- 부모: Refactoring_Best_Practices
- Adjacent: Composition over Inheritance
🤖 LLM 활용
언제: 매 sibling classes 매 duplication detection — LLM 매 structural similarity 매 잘 detect. 매 IDE refactor (IntelliJ, Rider) 매 mechanical transform 자동. 언제 X: 매 cross-cutting concern (logging, auth) — Pull Up 대신 매 aspect / decorator.
❌ 안티패턴
- Forced inheritance: 매 unrelated classes 매 method 공유 위해 매 fake superclass — composition 사용.
- God superclass: 매 너무 많이 pull up — base class 가 매 dumping ground 가 됨.
- LSP violation: 매 pulled-up method 가 매 some subclass 에서 매 invalid — split.
🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Fowler — Refactoring 2nd ed, 2018, ch 12).
- 신뢰도 A.
🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — full refactoring catalog entry |