--- id: wiki-2026-0508-management-consulting title: Management Consulting category: 10_Wiki/Topics status: verified canonical_id: self aliases: [경영 컨설팅, Strategy Consulting, Mgmt Consulting] duplicate_of: none source_trust_level: A confidence_score: 0.9 verification_status: applied tags: [education, consulting, strategy, business] raw_sources: [] last_reinforced: 2026-05-10 github_commit: pending tech_stack: language: english framework: business --- # Management Consulting ## 매 한 줄 > **"매 management consulting 은 hypothesis-driven problem solving as a service"**. McKinsey/BCG/Bain (MBB) 의 1960s codification — pyramid principle, MECE, issue tree, hypothesis-driven 의 four pillars. 매 2026 modern state: AI augmentation (Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5) 으로 research/synthesis 의 80% acceleration, but human judgment + executive trust 가 still core. ## 매 핵심 ### 매 four pillars - **Pyramid principle (Minto)**: top answer first, supporting reasons next, evidence below. - **MECE**: Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive — partition framework. - **Issue tree**: top question → sub-questions, recursively. - **Hypothesis-driven**: form answer first, test against data — not bottom-up boil-the-ocean. ### 매 typical engagement structure - Week 1-2: scoping, interviews, hypothesis tree. - Week 3-6: data gathering, model building, expert calls. - Week 7-9: synthesis, slide drafting, partner reviews. - Week 10-12: client workshops, final readout, implementation roadmap. ### 매 modern (2026) augmentation - **AI research**: Claude/GPT for industry primers, expert call prep, public filings synthesis. - **AI modeling**: code-interpreter for forecasts, sensitivity tables. - **AI slide drafting**: rough layout from issue tree + key numbers; human polish. - **Still human**: client relationship, executive trust, judgment under ambiguity, internal politics navigation. ### 매 firm tiers 1. **MBB**: McKinsey, BCG, Bain. 2. **Tier 2**: Strategy&, Oliver Wyman, LEK, Roland Berger, Kearney. 3. **Big 4 strategy**: Deloitte Monitor, EY-Parthenon, PwC Strategy&, KPMG. 4. **Boutique**: Veritas, Putnam, Analysis Group (specialized). ## 💻 패턴 ### Issue tree as data ```typescript interface IssueNode { question: string; hypothesis?: string; children: IssueNode[]; evidence: Evidence[]; status: "open" | "supported" | "refuted"; } function leaves(node: IssueNode): IssueNode[] { return node.children.length === 0 ? [node] : node.children.flatMap(leaves); } ``` ### MECE check ```typescript function isMECE(partition: T[][], universe: Set): { mutually: boolean; exhaustive: boolean } { const flat = partition.flat(); const mutually = flat.length === new Set(flat).size; const exhaustive = [...universe].every((x) => flat.includes(x)); return { mutually, exhaustive }; } ``` ### Pyramid principle slide skeleton ```markdown # [Action title: the answer in one sentence] - Reason 1: [supporting argument] - Evidence A - Evidence B - Reason 2: [supporting argument] - Reason 3: [supporting argument] ``` ### Profitability tree (canonical) ``` Profit ├── Revenue │ ├── Volume × Price │ │ ├── Market size × Share │ │ └── Mix × Discount └── Cost ├── COGS (variable) └── SG&A (fixed) ``` ### Expert call synthesis prompt (Claude Opus 4.7) ```typescript const prompt = ` You are a research analyst. Given these 5 expert call transcripts on [TOPIC], extract: 1. Areas of consensus (≥3 experts agree) 2. Areas of disagreement 3. Quantitative anchors (market size, growth, margin) 4. Open questions for further research Output as MECE bullets, max 300 words. `; ``` ### 2x2 framework template ```markdown | | High Impact | Low Impact | |--------------|-------------|------------| | Easy to do | DO NOW | Quick wins | | Hard to do | Strategic | DROP | ``` ## 매 결정 기준 | 상황 | Approach | |---|---| | C-suite strategy refresh | MBB or Tier 2 strategy boutique | | Operational turnaround | Big 4 + ops specialists (AlixPartners) | | M&A due diligence | Bain (PE focus), strategy boutiques | | Digital/AI transformation | McKinsey QuantumBlack, BCG X, Bain Vector | | In-house build | Hire ex-consultant + AI tooling | **기본값**: Hypothesis-driven + issue tree + MBB-style synthesis. AI augmentation for research/modeling. Human for trust/judgment. ## 🔗 Graph - 부모: [[Business Strategy]] - 변형: [[Strategy Consulting]] - 응용: [[Pyramid Principle]] · [[Issue Tree]] ## 🤖 LLM 활용 **언제**: industry primer, expert call prep, slide drafting, financial modeling, synthesis. **언제 X**: client relationship building, executive trust, internal politics, judgment calls under deep ambiguity. ## ❌ 안티패턴 - **Boil the ocean**: hypothesis 없이 모든 data 모음 → time/budget overrun. - **Pretty slides, weak answer**: aesthetics > insight 의 trap. - **Recommendation without data**: "we believe" without grounding. - **AI hallucination unchecked**: AI 의 fabricated stats 의 client-facing slide 의 disaster. ## 🧪 검증 / 중복 - Verified (Minto's Pyramid Principle, McKinsey/BCG/Bain public materials, 2026 industry observation). - 신뢰도 A. ## 🕓 Changelog | 날짜 | 변경 | |---|---| | 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 | | 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — FULL spec rewrite with 2026 AI augmentation context |