--- id: wiki-2026-0508-pipeline-parallelism title: Pipeline Parallelism category: 10_Wiki/Topics status: verified canonical_id: self aliases: [PP, GPipe, 1F1B] duplicate_of: none source_trust_level: A confidence_score: 0.9 verification_status: applied tags: [parallelism, distributed-training, deep-learning, llm] raw_sources: [] last_reinforced: 2026-05-10 github_commit: pending tech_stack: language: python framework: pytorch --- # Pipeline Parallelism ## 매 한 줄 > **"매 모델을 layer-wise로 잘라 GPU pipeline 위로 micro-batch가 흐르게 한다"**. 매 GPipe(2018)에서 시작, PipeDream / 1F1B / Interleaved 1F1B로 진화. 매 2026 LLM 학습(>100B params)에서 TP+PP+DP 조합의 한 축. ## 매 핵심 ### 매 왜 PP인가 - 매 단일 GPU 의 memory(HBM3 80–192GB) 의 초과 → layer 분할 필수. - 매 Tensor Parallelism 의 NVLink 안 high-bandwidth requirement → 매 node 간 한계. - 매 Pipeline Parallelism 의 stage 간 activation 만 전달 → 매 inter-node OK. ### 매 stage / micro-batch - Stage = 매 연속 layer 묶음, GPU 1개 차지. - Mini-batch 의 micro-batch K개로 split → 매 동시에 다른 stage에서 처리. - Bubble = 매 idle time. Bubble ratio ≈ (stages - 1) / K. ### 매 schedule 계열 1. **GPipe**: 매 forward all → backward all. 매 simple, 큰 bubble. 2. **1F1B (PipeDream)**: 매 1 forward, 1 backward 교대. 매 activation memory 절감. 3. **Interleaved 1F1B (Megatron)**: 매 stage 마다 여러 chunk → bubble 감소. 4. **Zero Bubble PP (2024)**: 매 backward를 W/B로 split → 매 거의 0 bubble. ## 💻 패턴 ### PyTorch native PipelineStage (torch.distributed.pipelining) ```python import torch import torch.nn as nn from torch.distributed.pipelining import pipeline, ScheduleGPipe, SplitPoint class Block(nn.Module): def __init__(self, d): super().__init__(); self.l = nn.Linear(d, d) def forward(self, x): return torch.relu(self.l(x)) class Net(nn.Module): def __init__(self): super().__init__() self.b1 = Block(1024); self.b2 = Block(1024) self.b3 = Block(1024); self.b4 = Block(1024) def forward(self, x): return self.b4(self.b3(self.b2(self.b1(x)))) model = Net() example = torch.randn(8, 1024) pipe = pipeline( model, mb_args=(example,), split_spec={"b3": SplitPoint.BEGINNING}, # stage0: b1-b2, stage1: b3-b4 ) stage = pipe.build_stage(stage_index=rank, device=f"cuda:{rank}") sched = ScheduleGPipe(stage, n_microbatches=4, loss_fn=nn.MSELoss()) ``` ### 1F1B schedule 계산 ```python def schedule_1f1b(num_stages: int, num_microbatches: int): """매 stage 별 forward/backward 순서 emit""" ops = [[] for _ in range(num_stages)] warmup = num_stages for s in range(num_stages): n_warm = min(warmup - s, num_microbatches) for mb in range(n_warm): ops[s].append(("F", mb)) for mb in range(num_microbatches - n_warm): ops[s].append(("F", n_warm + mb)) ops[s].append(("B", mb)) for mb in range(num_microbatches - n_warm, num_microbatches): ops[s].append(("B", mb)) return ops ``` ### Megatron-LM virtual pipeline ```python # v_chunks=2 → stage0 holds {layer 0-7, layer 16-23}, stage1 holds {8-15, 24-31} config = TransformerConfig( num_layers=32, hidden_size=8192, pipeline_model_parallel_size=4, virtual_pipeline_model_parallel_size=2, # interleaved chunks num_microbatches=64, ) ``` ### Activation recompute (memory bubble 완화) ```python from torch.utils.checkpoint import checkpoint class CheckpointedBlock(nn.Module): def forward(self, x): return checkpoint(self._fwd, x, use_reentrant=False) def _fwd(self, x): return self.attn(self.norm(x)) + x ``` ### DeepSpeed PipelineModule ```python import deepspeed from deepspeed.pipe import PipelineModule, LayerSpec specs = [LayerSpec(Block, 1024) for _ in range(8)] model = PipelineModule(layers=specs, num_stages=4, partition_method="uniform") engine, _, _, _ = deepspeed.initialize(model=model, config=ds_config) loss = engine.train_batch(data_iter) ``` ### 3D parallelism (TP × PP × DP) ```python # 매 Megatron / NeMo 의 conventional layout # world_size = TP × PP × DP # Llama 3 405B 학습: TP=8, PP=16, DP=128 → 16384 GPUs mesh = init_device_mesh("cuda", (DP, PP, TP), mesh_dim_names=("dp","pp","tp")) ``` ## 매 결정 기준 | 상황 | Approach | |---|---| | 매 single node, ≤8 GPU | TP only (NVLink) | | 매 multi-node, model > node mem | TP intra-node + PP inter-node | | 매 100B+ params | TP × PP × DP (3D) | | 매 inference latency 중요 | TP > PP (PP의 bubble 손해) | | 매 throughput 중심 training | PP + DP 큰 micro-batch | **기본값**: 매 LLM 학습은 1F1B + activation recompute + 3D parallel. ## 🔗 Graph - 부모: [[Distributed Training]] ## 🤖 LLM 활용 **언제**: 매 모델 weight 가 단일 GPU mem 초과 + 매 multi-node training. 매 cross-node bandwidth 가 TP에 부족할 때. **언제 X**: 매 단일 node 안 fits. 매 매우 작은 batch (bubble 비율 폭증). 매 inference latency-critical. ## ❌ 안티패턴 - **Bubble ignore**: 매 micro-batch K=1 → 매 GPU의 (stages-1)/stages 가 idle. - **Uneven partition**: 매 stage 별 FLOPs 불균형 → 매 가장 느린 stage 가 throughput 결정. - **PP only no DP**: 매 K 늘려도 batch size 한계 → 매 DP 병행 필수. - **Embedding 분리 무시**: 매 input/output embedding 의 같은 stage 배치 → tied weight sync 단순. ## 🧪 검증 / 중복 - Verified (Megatron-LM paper, GPipe, PipeDream, PyTorch pipelining docs 2026). - 신뢰도 A. ## 🕓 Changelog | 날짜 | 변경 | |---|---| | 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 | | 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — PP schedules + 3D parallel patterns |