--- id: wiki-2026-0508-data-distillation title: Data Distillation category: 10_Wiki/Topics status: verified canonical_id: self aliases: [data distillation, dataset distillation, synthetic data, knowledge distillation, sLLM, self-distillation] duplicate_of: none source_trust_level: A confidence_score: 0.88 verification_status: applied tags: [data-efficiency, dataset-distillation, knowledge-distillation, llm, sllm, self-distillation, synthetic] raw_sources: [] last_reinforced: 2026-05-10 github_commit: pending tech_stack: language: Python framework: PyTorch / Diffusers --- # Data Distillation ## 매 한 줄 > **"매 1000 의 image 의 매 10 의 essence"**. 매 huge dataset → 매 tiny synthetic. 매 model 의 same performance. 매 modern: 매 sLLM (small LLM) 의 trend — 매 GPT-4 의 distill 의 매 7B model. 매 Phi-3, 매 distillation 의 frontier. ## 매 핵심 ### 매 vs Knowledge Distillation - **Knowledge Distillation** (Hinton 2015): 매 teacher model → 매 student model. - **Data Distillation** (Wang 2018): 매 dataset → 매 small synthetic dataset. - **둘 다** 의 commonly combine. ### 매 dataset distillation methods #### Gradient Matching (Zhao 2021, DC) - 매 synthetic 의 train 의 gradient ≈ 매 real 의. #### Distribution Matching (DM) - 매 feature distribution 의 match. #### Trajectory Matching (MTT, Cazenavette 2022) - 매 training trajectory 의 match. #### Generative - 매 GAN / Diffusion 의 generate small. ### 매 modern (LLM era) #### Self-Distillation - 매 large model 의 generate → 매 small model 의 train. - 매 Phi-3 (Microsoft). - 매 Llama-3 의 cleaning. #### Distillation from Frontier - 매 GPT-4 의 reasoning trace → 매 7B fine-tune. - 매 ChatGPT → Vicuna, Alpaca. #### Quality > Quantity - 매 LIMA paper (Zhou 2023): 매 1K example 의 powerful. - 매 careful curation > 매 raw scrape. ### 매 응용 1. **Edge ML**: 매 small training data. 2. **Privacy**: 매 raw data 의 X. 3. **Continual learning**: 매 replay 의 compact. 4. **Architecture search**: 매 fast NAS. 5. **sLLM**: 매 small but capable. ### 매 trade-off - **Compression ratio**: 매 1% size 매 95% performance. - **Generalization to new architecture**: 매 weak (architecture-specific). - **Data privacy** + 매 utility 의 balance. ## 💻 패턴 ### Knowledge distillation (model) ```python import torch import torch.nn.functional as F def distill_loss(student_logits, teacher_logits, labels, T=4, alpha=0.7): soft_loss = F.kl_div( F.log_softmax(student_logits / T, dim=-1), F.softmax(teacher_logits / T, dim=-1), reduction='batchmean', ) * T * T hard_loss = F.cross_entropy(student_logits, labels) return alpha * soft_loss + (1 - alpha) * hard_loss # 매 training for x, y in loader: with torch.no_grad(): teacher_out = teacher(x) student_out = student(x) loss = distill_loss(student_out, teacher_out, y) loss.backward() ``` ### Dataset distillation (Gradient Matching, simplified) ```python def gradient_matching(real_loader, synthetic_data, model, n_iters=1000): """매 매 step 의 synthetic 의 update 의 real 의 gradient 와 의 match.""" syn_x = torch.randn(N_SYN, C, H, W, requires_grad=True) syn_y = torch.randint(0, n_classes, (N_SYN,)) for it in range(n_iters): # 매 real gradient real_x, real_y = next(iter(real_loader)) real_loss = F.cross_entropy(model(real_x), real_y) real_grad = torch.autograd.grad(real_loss, model.parameters()) # 매 synthetic gradient syn_loss = F.cross_entropy(model(syn_x), syn_y) syn_grad = torch.autograd.grad(syn_loss, model.parameters(), create_graph=True) # 매 match match_loss = sum((rg - sg).pow(2).mean() for rg, sg in zip(real_grad, syn_grad)) syn_x.grad = torch.autograd.grad(match_loss, syn_x)[0] syn_x.data -= LR * syn_x.grad return syn_x, syn_y ``` ### Self-distillation (LLM) ```python def self_distill_pipeline(teacher_model, base_student, prompts, n_examples=10000): """매 teacher 의 generate → 매 student 의 train.""" # 매 1. teacher 의 generate (with reasoning) examples = [] for prompt in prompts[:n_examples]: response = teacher_model.generate( prompt + "\n\nThink step by step.", max_tokens=2048, ) examples.append({'prompt': prompt, 'response': response}) # 매 2. quality filter examples = filter_quality(examples) # 매 3. SFT student train_sft(base_student, examples) return base_student ``` ### LIMA-style curated data ```python def lima_curate(candidate_dataset, n_keep=1000): """매 quality > quantity. 매 careful manual + 매 LLM filter.""" # 매 1. format check candidates = [c for c in candidate_dataset if format_valid(c)] # 매 2. quality filter (LLM-as-judge) scored = [] for c in candidates: score = llm_quality_judge(c) scored.append((c, score)) # 매 3. diversity sample scored.sort(key=lambda x: -x[1]) diverse_top = diverse_sample(scored, n=n_keep) # 매 cluster + 매 1 per cluster return [c for c, _ in diverse_top] ``` ### Synthetic data generation (LLM) ```python def generate_synthetic_qa(domain, n=10000): seed_examples = load_seed(domain) synthetic = [] for _ in range(n): prompt = f"""Generate a high-quality Q&A pair about {domain}. Style examples: {format_examples(seed_examples[:3])} Output format: Q: ... A: ... Generate a NEW Q&A:""" result = llm.generate(prompt) synthetic.append(parse_qa(result)) return synthetic ``` ### Compression evaluation ```python def evaluate_distilled_dataset(distilled, full_test): """매 매 architecture 의 evaluate.""" architectures = ['ResNet18', 'VGG11', 'ConvNet'] results = {} for arch in architectures: model = create(arch) train(model, distilled) results[arch] = evaluate(model, full_test) return results # 매 cross-arch generalization ``` ### Replay buffer compression (continual learning) ```python class CompressedReplay: def __init__(self, capacity=100, compression_method='distill'): self.buffer = [] self.capacity = capacity self.method = compression_method def add_task(self, task_data): if self.method == 'distill': distilled = dataset_distill(task_data, n_per_class=10) self.buffer.append(distilled) else: # 매 random subsample self.buffer.append(random.sample(task_data, self.capacity // len(self.buffer))) ``` ### Privacy via DP-distillation ```python def dp_distill(real_data, epsilon=1.0): """매 differentially private 의 distill.""" # 매 add noise to gradients syn_data = init_synthetic() for step in range(N_STEPS): grad = compute_gradient_match(syn_data, real_data) noise = laplace_noise(scale=1/epsilon) grad_private = grad + noise syn_data -= LR * grad_private return syn_data ``` ## 매 결정 기준 | 상황 | Approach | |---|---| | Tiny budget | Dataset distillation (Gradient Matching) | | Small LLM | Self-distillation from frontier | | Privacy | DP-distillation | | Continual learning | Compressed replay | | Quality + small data | LIMA curate | | Synthetic gen | LLM-driven | | Edge deploy | Knowledge distill (model) | **기본값**: Self-distillation from larger model (LLM era). ## 🔗 Graph - 부모: [[ML-Training]] · [[Knowledge-Distillation]] · [[Data-Efficiency]] - 변형: [[Dataset-Distillation]] · [[Self-Distillation]] · [[LIMA]] · [[Synthetic-Data]] - 응용: [[Phi-3]] · [[Vicuna]] · [[sLLM]] · [[Continual-Learning]] - Adjacent: [[Cross-Entropy Loss]] · [[Catastrophic-Forgetting]] · [[Computational-Creativity]] · [[CV_Synthesis]] ## 🤖 LLM 활용 **언제**: 매 sLLM training. 매 cost-efficient deploy. 매 privacy-sensitive. 매 continual replay. **언제 X**: 매 abundant real data + cheap compute. ## ❌ 안티패턴 - **Synthetic only (no real validation)**: 매 model collapse risk. - **Architecture-specific distill 의 cross-architecture expect**: 매 fail. - **No quality filter**: 매 noise amplify. - **Frontier 의 imitation 의 commercial use**: 매 ToS violation (some). - **DP epsilon 의 too low**: 매 utility lose. ## 🧪 검증 / 중복 - Verified (Wang 2018 dataset distillation, Hinton 2015 KD, Phi-3 paper, LIMA paper). - 신뢰도 A. - Related: [[Cross-Entropy Loss]] · [[Catastrophic-Forgetting]] · [[Computational-Creativity]] · [[CV_Synthesis]] · [[Cost-Benefit Analysis in AI]]. ## 🕓 Changelog | 날짜 | 변경 | |---|---| | 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 | | 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — methods + 매 KD / GM / self-distill / LIMA / DP code |