--- id: wiki-2026-0508-neuroplasticity-in-addiction title: Neuroplasticity in Addiction category: 10_Wiki/Topics status: verified canonical_id: self aliases: [Addiction Plasticity, Reward Learning Plasticity, Drug-Induced LTP] duplicate_of: none source_trust_level: A confidence_score: 0.9 verification_status: applied tags: [neuroplasticity, addiction, dopamine, ltp, mesolimbic] raw_sources: [] last_reinforced: 2026-05-10 github_commit: pending tech_stack: language: python framework: brian2-rl --- # Neuroplasticity in Addiction ## 매 한 줄 > **"매 reward 의 hijack — 매 mesolimbic LTP 의 maladaptive learning"**. 매 VTA→NAc dopamine surge 의 AMPA-receptor insertion 의 trigger, 매 cue→drug association 의 over-consolidation. 매 2026 의 ketamine / psilocybin assisted therapy 의 reverse-plasticity 의 promising clinical evidence. ## 매 핵심 ### 매 circuits - **Mesolimbic (VTA→NAc)**: 매 reward prediction error → 매 reinforcement. - **Mesocortical (VTA→mPFC)**: 매 craving, executive control 의 erode. - **Amygdala→NAc**: 매 cue-conditioning, withdrawal-anxiety. - **Hippocampus→NAc**: 매 contextual cues. ### 매 plasticity mechanisms - **AMPAR trafficking**: 매 GluA1 surface 의 increase → 매 NAc MSN excitability. - **Silent synapses**: 매 NMDAR-only 의 cocaine 후 의 unsilencing. - **Dendritic spines**: 매 stimulants → 매 spine density 의 increase. 매 opioids → 매 decrease. - **Epigenetic** (ΔFosB, HDAC5): 매 long-term gene-expression 의 lock-in. ### 매 응용 1. 매 cue-exposure therapy + reconsolidation blockade (propranolol, ketamine). 2. 매 TMS / DBS (NAc, sgACC) 의 craving reduction. 3. 매 contingency management + digital phenotyping. ## 💻 패턴 ### Q-learning model fit (drug-bias parameter) ```python import numpy as np def q_learn_ll(choices, rewards, alpha=0.3, beta=5.0): Q = np.zeros(2); ll = 0.0 for c, r in zip(choices, rewards): p = np.exp(beta*Q) / np.exp(beta*Q).sum() ll += np.log(p[c] + 1e-9) Q[c] += alpha * (r - Q[c]) return ll ``` ### Reconsolidation window detector ```python from datetime import timedelta def in_reconsolidation_window(cue_t, now_t, win_min=10, win_max=60): dt = (now_t - cue_t).total_seconds() / 60 return win_min <= dt <= win_max ``` ### Striatal MSN STDP (Brian2) ```python from brian2 import * G = NeuronGroup(100, 'dv/dt=(El-v)/tau:volt', threshold='v>-50*mV', reset='v=El') S = Synapses(G, G, '''w:1 dApre/dt=-Apre/tauPre:1 (event-driven) dApost/dt=-Apost/tauPost:1 (event-driven)''', on_pre='Apre+=dApre; w=clip(w+Apost,0,wmax)', on_post='Apost+=dApost; w=clip(w+Apre,0,wmax)') ``` ### Cue-reactivity fMRI ROI extraction ```python from nilearn import input_data masker = input_data.NiftiMasker(mask_img='nac_left.nii.gz', standardize=True) ts = masker.fit_transform('subject_task.nii.gz') craving_corr = np.corrcoef(beta_drug_cue_per_subj, vas_craving)[0, 1] ``` ### Digital-phenotyping relapse-risk score ```python def relapse_risk(z): # z: dict of z-scored features (gps_entropy, sleep_var, screen_night, hrv) s = 0.4*z['gps_entropy'] + 0.3*z['sleep_var'] \ + 0.2*z['screen_night'] - 0.1*z['hrv'] return 1 / (1 + np.exp(-s)) ``` ### Ketamine plasticity-window dosing protocol stub ```python from datetime import timedelta class KetamineProtocol: window_h = 24 # BDNF / mTOR peak def schedule_therapy(self, infusion_t): return infusion_t + timedelta(hours=2) ``` ### TMS dlPFC craving protocol ```python def tms_session(): return dict(target='left_dlPFC', frequency_hz=10, trains=20, pulses_per_train=50, inter_train_s=20, intensity_pct_rmt=110) ``` ## 매 결정 기준 | 상황 | Intervention | |---|---| | Acute craving | TMS dlPFC 10 Hz | | Treatment-resistant | DBS NAc (case-by-case) | | Comorbid depression | Ketamine + therapy | | Stimulant-use disorder | Contingency management + counseling | | Opioid-use disorder | Buprenorphine + therapy | **기본값**: CBT + medication + digital tools — 매 multimodal 의 best evidence. ## 🔗 Graph - 부모: [[Neuroplasticity]] · [[Addiction-Neuroscience]] - 변형: [[Reward-Prediction-Error]] - Adjacent: [[Mesolimbic-Pathway]] · [[Dopamine-System]] ## 🤖 LLM 활용 **언제**: 매 mechanism teaching, 매 protocol scaffold, 매 patient-education content. **언제 X**: 매 clinical decision making — 매 licensed clinician 의 require. ## ❌ 안티패턴 - **Plasticity = bad**: 매 plasticity itself 의 healing 의 vehicle. - **Single-receptor focus**: 매 D2-only blockade 의 outcomes 의 weak. 매 circuit-level 의 think. - **Reconsolidation hype**: 매 window narrow, 매 boundary conditions 의 strict. ## 🧪 검증 / 중복 - Verified (Lüscher & Malenka 2011 *Neuron*; Kalivas & Volkow 2005). - 신뢰도 A. ## 🕓 Changelog | 날짜 | 변경 | |---|---| | 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 | | 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — circuits + reversal-therapy patterns |