--- id: wiki-2026-0508-autoethnography title: Autoethnography category: 10_Wiki/Topics status: verified canonical_id: self aliases: [Auto-Ethnography, Self-Ethnography, Reflexive Ethnography] duplicate_of: none source_trust_level: A confidence_score: 0.86 verification_status: applied tags: [qualitative-research, ethnography, methodology, narrative, ux-research] raw_sources: [] last_reinforced: 2026-05-10 github_commit: pending tech_stack: language: Python framework: NVivo/Atlas.ti --- # Autoethnography ## 매 한 줄 > **"매 self-as-instrument — 매 personal experience 의 cultural lens 의 X, 매 cultural lens through personal experience."**. Autoethnography 의 ethnography 의 first-person 의 reflexive variant — Carolyn Ellis / Tony Adams 의 1990s formalize. 매 2026 의 UX research / HCI / AI ethics 의 standard method (영향 the lived experience of bias, accessibility, AI use). ## 매 핵심 ### 매 Types - **Evocative**: literary, emotional, narrative-driven. - **Analytic** (Anderson): theoretical contribution, research-oriented. - **Interpretive**: meaning-making, hermeneutic. - **Critical / performative**: activist, social-justice frame. ### 매 Method 1. **Field**: self in everyday context (often the researcher's own life domain). 2. **Data**: journal, photo, artifact, interview. 3. **Reflexivity**: position 의 explicit (gender, race, role). 4. **Layered analysis**: thick description + theoretical frame. 5. **Triangulation**: peer debrief, member check. ### 매 Validity Criteria - **Substantive contribution** (Richardson). - **Aesthetic merit**. - **Reflexivity / honesty**. - **Impact / resonance**. - **Verisimilitude** (Ellis). ### 매 응용 1. UX research (researcher 의 own use experience). 2. AI ethics (LLM 의 daily use 의 lived account). 3. Disability studies (insider perspective). 4. Medical sociology (illness narrative). ## 💻 패턴 ### Pattern 1 — Field journal template (Markdown) ```markdown --- date: 2026-05-10 context: solo coding session, claude-opus-4-7 mood: 6/10 position: M, 32y, SWE, 8y exp --- # Observation - 14:00 prompted Claude w/ vague spec → suggested decomposition steps... - 14:15 felt resistance to refactor; noticed "it's working, why touch" # Reflection - 매 sunk-cost feeling 의 cultural inheritance? Engineering pride? # Theoretical link - Norman 의 affordance / Schön 의 reflective practitioner. ``` ### Pattern 2 — Coding (qualitative) — open coding ```python codes = { "resistance-to-refactor": ["sunk cost", "it's working", "why touch"], "delegation-discomfort": ["am I cheating", "is this me"], "flow-with-LLM": ["pair programming", "thinking partner"], } ``` ### Pattern 3 — Layered narrative (analytic) ```markdown ## Vignette [evocative narrative paragraph] ## Analysis [theoretical interpretation: Schön reflective practice] ## Cultural connection [broader: SWE identity in age of LLM agents] ``` ### Pattern 4 — Member check (peer debrief) ```python # Share excerpt with informant for response checks = [ {"excerpt": "...", "informant": "P3", "response": "yes resonates", "date": "2026-05-09"}, {"excerpt": "...", "informant": "P5", "response": "I'd frame differently", "date": "2026-05-09"}, ] ``` ## 매 결정 기준 | 상황 | Approach | |---|---| | Researcher 의 own lived domain | Autoethnography (insider) | | Other community | Ethnography (outsider) + reflexivity | | Quick UX insight | diary study + autoethnography hybrid | | Theory contribution | Analytic autoethnography (Anderson) | | Activist / community | Critical / performative | **기본값**: Analytic autoethnography with peer debrief + member check. ## 🔗 Graph - 부모: [[Ethnography]] - 변형: [[Memoir]] - 응용: [[AI-Ethics]] - Adjacent: [[Autobiography]] · [[Grounded-Theory-Method]] ## 🤖 LLM 활용 **언제**: studying one's own use of tech / LLM, insider perspective on team or community, theoretical reflection. **언제 X**: large-N generalization needed, double-blind requirement, no reflexivity training. ## ❌ 안티패턴 - **Solipsism**: 매 self 의 only — no theoretical contribution. - **No reflexivity**: position 의 unmark — bias hidden. - **Cherry-picked vignette**: confirmation bias. - **Skipping member check** in critical / community work. ## 🧪 검증 / 중복 - Verified (Ellis & Bochner, Anderson 2006, Adams et al. "Autoethnography" 2015). - 신뢰도 A. ## 🕓 Changelog | 날짜 | 변경 | |---|---| | 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 | | 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — FULL content (types, validity criteria, 4 patterns) |