refactor(topics): 멀티 에이전트용 지식 재편 — _Common(공통 기본기) + Domain_* 구조

에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게
[공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류.
문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인).

- Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존)
- Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design
- Topic_Business → Domain_Product
- Topic_General → Domain_General
- _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning),
  Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing)
- 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서)
- 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures)
- 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
2026-07-11 11:05:56 +09:00
parent 6549ead309
commit c24165b8bc
6193 changed files with 1717 additions and 31 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
---
id: wiki-2026-0508-keeper-of-the-vision
title: Keeper of the Vision
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [Keeper of the Vision, Vision Keeper, 비전 수호자, Architect Role]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.85
verification_status: applied
tags: [architecture, leadership, role, organization, technical-direction]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: n/a
framework: organizational
---
# Keeper of the Vision
## 매 한 줄
> **"매 architect 의 most-underrated 의무"**. Keeper of the Vision 매 architectural integrity 매 long-term direction 매 day-to-day pressure 의 face 매 protect 매 role — 매 single coherent product/system 의 maintain 매 short-term shortcut 매 technical debt 의 accumulation 의 방지. Brooks ("Mythical Man-Month"), Fowler 매 emphasized.
## 매 핵심
### 매 What the Keeper does
- **Conceptual integrity**: 매 system 매 단일 mind 의 product 처럼 feel 하도록.
- **Veto authority**: 매 vision-violating change 의 block (or escalate).
- **Trade-off articulation**: 매 short-term gain vs long-term cost 의 명확.
- **Mentorship**: 매 team 매 vision 의 internalize 하도록.
- **Public memory**: 매 ADR (Architecture Decision Record) 매 maintain.
### 매 Tensions
- **Speed vs coherence**: 매 PM 매 ship now, 매 keeper 매 do it right.
- **Local vs global**: 매 team A 매 best for them, 매 worst for system.
- **Innovation vs consistency**: 매 new framework 매 cool, 매 다양 ization 매 maintenance burden.
### 매 응용
1. **Tech lead role**: 매 small team 매 lead 의 explicit responsibility.
2. **Staff/Principal engineer**: 매 cross-team 매 keeper.
3. **Game director / Lead designer**: 매 product vision (Miyamoto, Sid Meier model).
4. **Open source BDFL**: 매 Linus, Guido, Matz — 매 codified extreme.
## 💻 패턴
### Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
```markdown
# ADR-0042: Use SQLite for embedded analytics, not Postgres
Status: Accepted
Date: 2026-04-12
Context: Edge devices need local analytics queries...
Decision: SQLite + Litestream replication.
Consequences:
+ zero ops, single binary
- no advanced window functions until SQLite 3.45
Vision alignment: "operate offline-first" pillar #2.
```
### Vision artifact (one-pager)
```markdown
# Product North Star (2026)
1. Offline-first: every feature works without network.
2. Single-binary deploy: no docker required for self-host.
3. Plain-text data: SQLite + JSON, no proprietary blobs.
4. Pluggable AI: vendor-neutral, swap Anthropic ↔ local Llama.
```
### Keeper review checklist (PR template)
```markdown
- [ ] Aligns with North Star pillars (#14)?
- [ ] Introduces new dependency? Justify.
- [ ] Adds DB migration? Reversible?
- [ ] Public API change? ADR required.
- [ ] Latency impact measured?
```
### Conceptual integrity test
```python
def integrity_smell(diff: Diff) -> list[str]:
smells = []
if introduces_new_pattern(diff) and not has_adr(diff):
smells.append("New pattern w/o ADR")
if duplicates_existing(diff):
smells.append(f"Duplicates {diff.similar_to}")
if cross_layer_import(diff):
smells.append("Layer boundary violated")
return smells
```
### Office-hours protocol
```
Weekly architect office hours (1h):
- Anyone bring design Q
- Whiteboard walkthrough
- Output: ADR draft or "go ahead"
Cost: 1h/week. Benefit: prevents 10× cost of misalignment.
```
## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| 매 small team (≤5) | 매 tech lead 매 implicit keeper |
| 매 medium (520) | 매 explicit "architect" role 매 part-time |
| 매 large (>20) | 매 architecture guild + Staff/Principal 매 keeper |
| 매 OSS project | 매 BDFL or 매 core team 매 vote |
| 매 startup early | 매 founder/CTO 매 keeper |
**기본값**: 매 ADR + weekly office hours + 매 명시적 vision document.
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Conceptual Integrity]]
- 응용: [[ADR (Architecture Decision Record)]]
- Adjacent: [[Conways-Law]] · [[Technical_Debt|Technical-Debt]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 architect role responsibilities 의 articulate; 매 ADR template; 매 architecture review checklist.
**언제 X**: 매 individual contributor 의 day-to-day coding (다른 layer); 매 PM/product strategy (overlap 있지만 scope 다름).
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Ivory tower architect**: 매 코드 매 안 짜고 매 mandate 만 — 매 lose credibility.
- **Veto-only**: 매 block 만 하고 매 alternatives 매 propose 안 함.
- **Vision drift**: 매 6 months 매 vision 매 silent 변경 — 매 team 매 confused.
- **Hero dependency**: 매 keeper 떠나면 매 collapse — 매 succession plan 필요.
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Brooks "Mythical Man-Month" Ch.4 conceptual integrity, Fowler "Who Needs an Architect?", Kruchten ADR origin 2011).
- 신뢰도 A.
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — full content (architect role, ADR patterns) |