refactor(topics): 멀티 에이전트용 지식 재편 — _Common(공통 기본기) + Domain_* 구조
에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게 [공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류. 문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인). - Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존) - Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design - Topic_Business → Domain_Product - Topic_General → Domain_General - _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning), Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing) - 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서) - 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures) - 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
+193
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: wiki-2026-0508-비기능-요구사항-non-functional-requirem
|
||||
title: 비기능 요구사항 (Non-functional Requirements)
|
||||
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
||||
status: verified
|
||||
canonical_id: self
|
||||
aliases: [NFR, Non-functional Requirements, Quality Attributes, -ilities]
|
||||
duplicate_of: none
|
||||
source_trust_level: A
|
||||
confidence_score: 0.9
|
||||
verification_status: applied
|
||||
tags: [architecture, requirements, quality-attributes, nfr, sre]
|
||||
raw_sources: []
|
||||
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
||||
github_commit: pending
|
||||
tech_stack:
|
||||
language: YAML/SQL
|
||||
framework: SLO frameworks (Google SRE)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 비기능 요구사항 (Non-functional Requirements, NFRs)
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 한 줄
|
||||
> **"매 NFR은 시스템이 *어떻게* 동작해야 하는가의 명세이며 매 architecture는 NFR 의 함수다"**. 매 functional requirement 가 *what* 이라면 NFR 은 *how-well*; 매 ISO 25010 quality model 이 2026 의 표준이며 매 SLO/SLI 형태로 measurable 화 된다.
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 핵심
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 ISO/IEC 25010 quality attributes
|
||||
- **Performance efficiency**: time behaviour, resource utilization, capacity.
|
||||
- **Reliability**: availability, fault tolerance, recoverability, maturity.
|
||||
- **Security**: confidentiality, integrity, non-repudiation, authenticity, accountability.
|
||||
- **Maintainability**: modularity, reusability, analyzability, modifiability, testability.
|
||||
- **Portability**: adaptability, installability, replaceability.
|
||||
- **Compatibility**: co-existence, interoperability.
|
||||
- **Usability**: learnability, operability, accessibility.
|
||||
- **Functional suitability**: completeness, correctness, appropriateness.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 measurable 화
|
||||
- **SLI**: 매 service-level indicator (latency p99, error rate, availability ratio).
|
||||
- **SLO**: 매 service-level objective (99.9% over 30d, p99 < 250ms).
|
||||
- **SLA**: 매 contract with consequences (penalty, refund).
|
||||
- **Error budget**: 매 1 - SLO; 매 deploy/feature freeze trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 응용
|
||||
1. 매 NFR-driven architecture: cache for performance, replication for availability, audit log for accountability.
|
||||
2. 매 NFR-driven test: load test, chaos engineering, security pentest, accessibility audit.
|
||||
3. 매 NFR-driven trade-off: CAP theorem (consistency vs availability), latency vs throughput.
|
||||
|
||||
## 💻 패턴
|
||||
|
||||
### NFR specification (FURPS+)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
nfr:
|
||||
performance:
|
||||
latency_p99_ms: 250
|
||||
throughput_rps: 1000
|
||||
cpu_utilization_max: 0.7
|
||||
availability:
|
||||
slo: 99.95
|
||||
measurement_window: 30d
|
||||
error_budget_min_per_quarter: 0.001
|
||||
security:
|
||||
auth: OAuth2 + PKCE
|
||||
transport: TLS 1.3 only
|
||||
data_at_rest: AES-256-GCM
|
||||
audit_log_retention: 7y
|
||||
scalability:
|
||||
horizontal: 10x peak in 5min
|
||||
observability:
|
||||
log_format: JSON, OpenTelemetry
|
||||
trace_sampling: 0.1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### SLO definition (Prometheus)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
- alert: APILatencyBudgetBurn
|
||||
expr: |
|
||||
(
|
||||
histogram_quantile(0.99,
|
||||
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job="api"}[5m])) by (le))
|
||||
> 0.25
|
||||
)
|
||||
for: 10m
|
||||
annotations:
|
||||
summary: p99 latency exceeds 250ms SLO
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Multi-burn-rate alert
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# Google SRE multi-window multi-burn-rate
|
||||
- alert: ErrorBudgetFastBurn
|
||||
expr: |
|
||||
(
|
||||
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[1h]))
|
||||
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total[1h]))
|
||||
) > (14.4 * (1 - 0.999))
|
||||
AND
|
||||
(
|
||||
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
|
||||
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
|
||||
) > (14.4 * (1 - 0.999))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance budget (frontend)
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// budget.config.js — Lighthouse CI
|
||||
module.exports = {
|
||||
ci: {
|
||||
assert: {
|
||||
assertions: {
|
||||
'first-contentful-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 1800 }],
|
||||
'largest-contentful-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 2500 }],
|
||||
'total-blocking-time': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 200 }],
|
||||
'cumulative-layout-shift': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 0.1 }],
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Resilience: circuit breaker
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
class CircuitBreaker<T> {
|
||||
private failures = 0;
|
||||
private state: 'closed'|'open'|'half-open' = 'closed';
|
||||
private openedAt = 0;
|
||||
constructor(private fn: () => Promise<T>, private threshold = 5, private cooldownMs = 30_000) {}
|
||||
async call(): Promise<T> {
|
||||
if (this.state === 'open') {
|
||||
if (Date.now() - this.openedAt > this.cooldownMs) this.state = 'half-open';
|
||||
else throw new Error('circuit-open');
|
||||
}
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const r = await this.fn();
|
||||
this.failures = 0;
|
||||
this.state = 'closed';
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
if (++this.failures >= this.threshold) {
|
||||
this.state = 'open';
|
||||
this.openedAt = Date.now();
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw e;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Accessibility audit (a11y NFR)
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// axe-core CI gate
|
||||
import { AxePuppeteer } from '@axe-core/puppeteer';
|
||||
const results = await new AxePuppeteer(page).analyze();
|
||||
const critical = results.violations.filter(v => v.impact === 'critical');
|
||||
if (critical.length > 0) throw new Error(`a11y: ${critical.length} critical violations`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 결정 기준
|
||||
| 상황 | Approach |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Public API | Latency + availability SLO + rate limit |
|
||||
| Financial system | Strong consistency + audit log + 7y retention |
|
||||
| Mobile app | Battery + bundle size + offline-first |
|
||||
| B2B SaaS | Multi-tenant isolation + SOC2 + 99.9% SLA |
|
||||
| Real-time game | p99 latency + tick budget + recoverability |
|
||||
|
||||
**기본값**: 매 SMART NFR (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bounded) + SLO 형태로 명세.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Graph
|
||||
- 부모: [[Software Architecture]]
|
||||
- 응용: [[ATAM (Architecture Trade-offs Analysis Method)]] · [[소프트웨어 아키텍처 평가 (Software Architecture Evaluation)]]
|
||||
- Adjacent: [[SLO]] · [[Chaos Engineering]] · [[복잡한 비즈니스 도메인 (금융 헬스케어 이커머스 등)]]
|
||||
|
||||
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
||||
**언제**: 매 NFR elicitation workshop, SLO/SLI draft, ISO 25010 mapping, NFR-to-architecture trace matrix.
|
||||
**언제 X**: 매 binding SLA terms (legal review 필수), 매 actual production SLO measurement (instrumentation 필요).
|
||||
|
||||
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
||||
- **Wishlist NFR**: 매 "fast", "secure", "scalable" — non-measurable.
|
||||
- **NFR as afterthought**: 매 sprint 끝에 retrofit → architectural rewrite 발생.
|
||||
- **One-size SLO**: 매 모든 endpoint 99.99% → cost 폭증.
|
||||
- **No error budget**: 매 SLO 만 있고 budget consumption tracking 없음 → meaningless.
|
||||
- **Gold-plating reliability**: 매 needed 99.9% 위 99.999% pursuit → 100x cost.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
||||
- Verified (ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Google SRE Book Ch.4, Bass et al. "Software Architecture in Practice" 4ed).
|
||||
- 신뢰도 A.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🕓 Changelog
|
||||
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
||||
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — ISO 25010 + SLO/SLI + NFR specification patterns |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user