refactor(topics): 멀티 에이전트용 지식 재편 — _Common(공통 기본기) + Domain_* 구조

에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게
[공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류.
문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인).

- Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존)
- Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design
- Topic_Business → Domain_Product
- Topic_General → Domain_General
- _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning),
  Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing)
- 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서)
- 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures)
- 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
2026-07-11 11:05:56 +09:00
parent 6549ead309
commit c24165b8bc
6193 changed files with 1717 additions and 31 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
---
id: wiki-2026-0508-term-frequency-inverse-document-
title: Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [TF-IDF, tfidf, classic IR baseline]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.95
verification_status: applied
tags: [ir, nlp, retrieval, baseline, sklearn]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: python
framework: scikit-learn
---
# Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency
## 매 한 줄
> **"매 term frequency × inverse document frequency — 매 word's importance 의 corpus context 매 weight"**. Karen Spärck Jones (1972) 의 IDF formalization. 2026 매 dense retrieval (BGE, E5) 매 default 매도 매 baseline + hybrid (BM25 + dense) 의 second stage 매 still ubiquitous.
## 매 핵심
### 매 Formula
- **TF**: term의 doc 매 count (raw / log-normalized / frequency).
- **IDF**: `log(N / df_t)` — 매 N corpus size, df_t = doc 매 t의 contains 의 count.
- **TF-IDF**: TF(t,d) × IDF(t).
- **L2 norm**: 매 cosine 의 prepare.
### 매 Variants
- Raw TF / log(1+TF) / sublinear.
- IDF smoothing: `log((1+N)/(1+df)) + 1`.
- BM25: 매 TF saturation + length normalization 의 add.
### 매 응용
1. Search baseline (sklearn + scikit-learn).
2. Hybrid retrieval — 매 BM25 + dense embedding의 reciprocal-rank fuse.
3. Feature extraction 매 classical ML (logistic regression, SVM).
4. Keyword extraction (top-k tfidf).
## 💻 패턴
### sklearn TF-IDF
```python
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
corpus = [
"the cat sat on the mat",
"the dog ate the bone",
"cats and dogs are pets",
]
vec = TfidfVectorizer(stop_words="english", sublinear_tf=True, ngram_range=(1, 2))
X = vec.fit_transform(corpus) # sparse (n_docs, n_features)
print(vec.get_feature_names_out())
```
### Cosine search
```python
from sklearn.metrics.pairwise import cosine_similarity
q = vec.transform(["pet animals"])
sims = cosine_similarity(q, X).flatten()
ranking = sims.argsort()[::-1]
```
### Manual IDF (educational)
```python
import math
from collections import Counter
def compute_idf(corpus_tokens):
N = len(corpus_tokens)
df = Counter()
for tokens in corpus_tokens:
for t in set(tokens):
df[t] += 1
return {t: math.log((N + 1) / (df_t + 1)) + 1 for t, df_t in df.items()}
```
### BM25 (preferred over plain TF-IDF for IR)
```python
from rank_bm25 import BM25Okapi
tokenized = [doc.lower().split() for doc in corpus]
bm25 = BM25Okapi(tokenized, k1=1.5, b=0.75)
scores = bm25.get_scores("pet animals".split())
```
### Hybrid search (2026 standard)
```python
import numpy as np
def rrf(rankings, k=60):
scores = {}
for ranking in rankings:
for rank, doc_id in enumerate(ranking):
scores[doc_id] = scores.get(doc_id, 0) + 1 / (k + rank)
return sorted(scores, key=scores.get, reverse=True)
bm25_top = bm25.get_top_n("query".split(), corpus, n=100)
dense_top = dense_index.search("query", k=100)
final = rrf([bm25_top, dense_top])[:10]
```
### Top keyword extraction
```python
def top_keywords(doc_idx, vec, X, k=10):
row = X[doc_idx].toarray().flatten()
feats = vec.get_feature_names_out()
top = np.argsort(-row)[:k]
return [(feats[i], row[i]) for i in top]
```
### Persistence
```python
import joblib
joblib.dump((vec, X), "tfidf_index.joblib")
vec, X = joblib.load("tfidf_index.joblib")
```
## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Approach |
|---|---|
| 매 small corpus + interpretability | TF-IDF (sklearn) |
| 매 medium corpus + better recall | BM25 |
| 매 semantic / paraphrase | Dense (BGE-M3, E5) |
| 매 production search | Hybrid (BM25 + dense + RRF) |
| 매 keyword extraction / explanation | Plain TF-IDF top-k |
**기본값**: 매 BM25 baseline → 매 hybrid + reranker (cross-encoder) for 2026 production.
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Information Retrieval]]
- 변형: [[BM25]]
- 응용: [[Search Engine]] · [[RAG]]
- Adjacent: [[Dense Retrieval]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 small corpus 매 lookup, 매 RAG 의 sparse channel, 매 explainability ("matched on 'mat', 'cat'").
**언제 X**: 매 paraphrase / multilingual 매 weak — 매 dense 의 prefer.
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **TF-IDF 만으로 production search**: 매 paraphrase miss.
- **No stopword / lowercasing**: 매 noisy features.
- **Same vectorizer not pickled**: 매 train/serve mismatch.
- **No length normalization**: 매 long docs 의 unfair advantage (use BM25 또는 normalize).
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Spärck Jones 1972; Manning IR Book Ch.6; sklearn TfidfVectorizer 2026).
- 신뢰도 A.
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — TF-IDF formula + sklearn + BM25 + hybrid RRF |