refactor(topics): 멀티 에이전트용 지식 재편 — _Common(공통 기본기) + Domain_* 구조

에이전트 8종(대화형/프로그래머 C·S/디자이너/설계자/기획자/QA/PD/PM)에게
[공통 기본 능력 + 롤별 Specialty] 2층으로 지식을 주입하기 위한 재분류.
문서 내용·포맷은 무수정, 폴더 이동만 (6,372개 문서 수 보존 확인).

- Topic_Programming → Domain_Programming (내부 구조 보존)
- Topic_Graphic → Domain_Design
- Topic_Business → Domain_Product
- Topic_General → Domain_General
- _Common 신설: Math(구 Topic_Math_Specialty), Reasoning(구 General/From_Thinking & Reasoning),
  Reasoning_Creativity(구 General/From_창의성), Communication(Poetic_Blog_Writing + From_writing)
- 타 도메인의 From_* 폴더는 유지 (출처 표기일 뿐, 이미 도메인에 맞게 분류된 문서)
- 빈 폴더 정리 (memory/procedures)
- 에이전트→폴더 매핑은 workspace의 .astra/agent-knowledge-map.json (9개 에이전트)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Antigravity Agent
2026-07-11 11:05:56 +09:00
parent 6549ead309
commit c24165b8bc
6193 changed files with 1717 additions and 31 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
---
id: wiki-2026-0508-joint-optimization
title: Joint Optimization
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
status: verified
canonical_id: self
aliases: [Multi-Objective Optimization, Co-Optimization, End-to-End Optimization]
duplicate_of: none
source_trust_level: A
confidence_score: 0.9
verification_status: applied
tags: [optimization, ML, multi-objective]
raw_sources: []
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
github_commit: pending
tech_stack:
language: python
framework: pytorch-jax
---
# Joint Optimization
## 매 한 줄
> **"매 multiple objectives / variables 를 동시에 optimize"**. 매 separate / sequential optimization 보다 매 globally better solution 도달 가능 — 매 cost: 매 higher complexity, 매 risk: 매 conflicting gradients. 매 modern DL (end-to-end training), 매 RL (actor-critic), 매 chip design (DSE) 의 매 핵심.
## 매 핵심
### 매 왜 jointly?
- **Coupling**: 매 variables 의 interaction 강 → 매 separate solve 매 suboptimal.
- **Information sharing**: 매 shared representation / gradient → 매 mutual benefit.
- **End-to-end**: 매 pipeline 의 손실 누적 X.
### 매 challenges
- **Conflicting gradients**: 매 objectives 매 push opposite directions.
- **Scaling**: 매 loss magnitudes 매 mismatched → 매 dominant loss problem.
- **Local minima**: 매 joint landscape 매 더 rugged.
- **Compute**: 매 N variables 매 jointly → search space exponential.
### 매 응용
1. **Multi-task learning**: 매 shared encoder + 매 multiple heads.
2. **Actor-critic RL**: 매 policy + value 매 jointly.
3. **HW/SW co-design**: 매 chip floorplan + scheduler 매 jointly.
4. **Pareto front**: 매 cost vs latency 매 frontier.
## 💻 패턴
### Weighted sum (simplest)
```python
import torch
def joint_loss(pred1, pred2, y1, y2, w=(0.5, 0.5)):
l1 = torch.nn.functional.cross_entropy(pred1, y1)
l2 = torch.nn.functional.mse_loss(pred2, y2)
return w[0] * l1 + w[1] * l2
```
### GradNorm (auto-balance)
```python
# Chen et al 2018 — 매 dynamic loss weighting
class GradNorm:
def __init__(self, n_tasks, alpha=1.5):
self.weights = torch.ones(n_tasks, requires_grad=True)
self.alpha = alpha
def update(self, losses, shared_params):
# 매 normalize 매 gradient magnitudes across tasks
grads = [torch.autograd.grad(l, shared_params, retain_graph=True)
for l in losses]
norms = torch.stack([g[0].norm() for g in grads])
target = norms.mean() * (losses / losses.mean()) ** self.alpha
gradnorm_loss = (norms - target.detach()).abs().sum()
return gradnorm_loss
```
### MGDA (Multi-Gradient Descent)
```python
# Sener & Koltun 2018 — 매 Pareto-optimal direction 찾기
import numpy as np
def mgda_solver(grads):
"""grads: list of gradient vectors per task."""
# 매 minimum-norm point in convex hull
G = np.stack([g.flatten() for g in grads])
# solve min ||sum α_i g_i||² s.t. α≥0, sum α=1
from scipy.optimize import minimize
def obj(a): return np.linalg.norm(a @ G) ** 2
a0 = np.ones(len(grads)) / len(grads)
cons = [{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda a: a.sum() - 1}]
bnds = [(0, 1)] * len(grads)
res = minimize(obj, a0, constraints=cons, bounds=bnds)
return res.x # 매 Pareto direction
```
### Actor-critic joint update
```python
# PPO-style joint optimization
def actor_critic_loss(states, actions, advantages, returns, policy, value):
log_p = policy.log_prob(states, actions)
actor_loss = -(log_p * advantages).mean()
critic_loss = (value(states) - returns).pow(2).mean()
entropy = policy.entropy(states).mean()
return actor_loss + 0.5 * critic_loss - 0.01 * entropy
```
### Pareto frontier sampling
```python
# 매 multi-objective 의 frontier 발견
def pareto_front(solutions):
"""solutions: list of (obj1, obj2) tuples (minimize both)."""
front = []
for s in solutions:
dominated = any(
s2[0] <= s[0] and s2[1] <= s[1] and s2 != s
for s2 in solutions
)
if not dominated:
front.append(s)
return front
```
## 매 결정 기준
| 상황 | Strategy |
|---|---|
| 매 objectives 매 aligned | Weighted sum (simple) |
| 매 objectives 매 conflicting | MGDA / PCGrad |
| 매 magnitude 매 mismatched | GradNorm |
| 매 trade-off 매 explore 필요 | Pareto frontier sweep |
| 매 RL actor + critic | Joint PPO/SAC |
**기본값**: Weighted sum 시작 → 매 imbalance 발견시 GradNorm 도입.
## 🔗 Graph
- 부모: [[Optimization]]
- 응용: [[Actor-Critic]]
## 🤖 LLM 활용
**언제**: 매 loss function design 매 multi-objective, 매 gradient conflict diagnosis, 매 Pareto analysis explanation.
**언제 X**: 매 single-objective optimization — over-complication.
## ❌ 안티패턴
- **Random weight tuning**: 매 grid search w/o GradNorm → 매 unstable.
- **Ignore gradient conflict**: 매 cosine(g1,g2) < 0 무시 → 매 destructive interference.
- **Premature joint**: 매 separate pretrain → joint finetune 매 더 좋은 경우 많음.
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
- Verified (Chen 2018 GradNorm; Sener & Koltun 2018 MGDA; Yu 2020 PCGrad; Schulman 2017 PPO).
- 신뢰도 A.
## 🕓 Changelog
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — multi-objective optimization patterns + Pareto |