docs(10_Wiki): Topic_Business/General/Graphic/Programming을 Topics/ 하위로 이동
최상위 10_Wiki/Topic_*였던 4개 카테고리 폴더를 10_Wiki/Topics/Topic_* 로 재배치. 콘텐츠 변경 없음(순수 폴더 이동) — Topics/ 하위 나머지 폴더는 이미 지난 커밋에서 전부 정리된 상태(잔존 항목은 에이전트 운영 상태 및 사용자가 보존을 요청한 업데이트0615/무제 3.canvas 뿐).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: wiki-2026-0508-feedback-loops
|
||||
title: Feedback Loops
|
||||
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
||||
status: verified
|
||||
canonical_id: self
|
||||
aliases: [Feedback Control, Closed Loop, Cybernetic Feedback]
|
||||
duplicate_of: none
|
||||
source_trust_level: A
|
||||
confidence_score: 0.9
|
||||
verification_status: applied
|
||||
tags: [systems, control-theory, cybernetics, dynamics]
|
||||
raw_sources: []
|
||||
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
||||
github_commit: pending
|
||||
tech_stack:
|
||||
language: python
|
||||
framework: control-systems
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Feedback Loops
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 한 줄
|
||||
> **"매 system output 의 input 의 re-entry — 매 stability 또는 amplification 의 결정"**. 매 1948 Wiener 의 Cybernetics 가 unifying frame. 매 2026 의 RLHF, autoscaling, climate tipping points, social media engagement loop 의 modern instances.
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 핵심
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 2 polarities
|
||||
- **Negative (balancing)**: 매 deviation 의 dampen — 매 thermostat, homeostasis, PID controller.
|
||||
- **Positive (reinforcing)**: 매 deviation 의 amplify — 매 viral growth, asset bubble, ice-albedo feedback, runaway selection.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 5 archetypes (Senge)
|
||||
- **Limits to growth**: 매 reinforcing + balancing — 매 S-curve.
|
||||
- **Shifting the burden**: 매 quick fix 의 underlying issue 의 weaken.
|
||||
- **Tragedy of the commons**: 매 individual reinforcing → collective collapse.
|
||||
- **Fixes that fail**: 매 short-term fix 의 long-term backfire.
|
||||
- **Success to the successful**: 매 winner-take-all reinforcing.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 stability concepts
|
||||
- **Gain**: 매 output/input ratio.
|
||||
- **Phase margin**: 매 stability buffer (>45° robust).
|
||||
- **Time delay**: 매 instability driver (Bode-Nyquist).
|
||||
- **Setpoint vs. error**: 매 target — actual.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 응용
|
||||
1. PID controller (industrial process).
|
||||
2. RLHF (LLM 의 preference loop).
|
||||
3. Autoscaling (Kubernetes HPA, target CPU).
|
||||
4. Insulin-glucose homeostasis.
|
||||
5. Market price discovery.
|
||||
|
||||
## 💻 패턴
|
||||
|
||||
### PID controller
|
||||
```python
|
||||
class PID:
|
||||
def __init__(self, kp: float, ki: float, kd: float, setpoint: float):
|
||||
self.kp, self.ki, self.kd = kp, ki, kd
|
||||
self.setpoint = setpoint
|
||||
self.integral = 0.0
|
||||
self.prev_error = 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
def step(self, measurement: float, dt: float) -> float:
|
||||
error = self.setpoint - measurement
|
||||
self.integral += error * dt
|
||||
derivative = (error - self.prev_error) / dt if dt > 0 else 0
|
||||
self.prev_error = error
|
||||
return self.kp * error + self.ki * self.integral + self.kd * derivative
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Logistic growth (limits-to-growth archetype)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import numpy as np
|
||||
from scipy.integrate import odeint
|
||||
|
||||
def logistic(N, t, r, K):
|
||||
return r * N * (1 - N / K)
|
||||
|
||||
t = np.linspace(0, 50, 500)
|
||||
N = odeint(logistic, y0=1, t=t, args=(0.3, 1000))
|
||||
# Reinforcing (rN) + balancing ((1 - N/K))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Autoscaling reactive loop
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def autoscale_step(current_replicas: int, cpu_utilization: float,
|
||||
target: float = 0.7, max_replicas: int = 100) -> int:
|
||||
desired = int(current_replicas * cpu_utilization / target)
|
||||
return max(1, min(desired, max_replicas))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Reinforcement learning (RLHF reward model loop)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def rlhf_iteration(policy, reward_model, prompts, ppo_optimizer):
|
||||
rollouts = [policy.generate(p) for p in prompts]
|
||||
rewards = [reward_model.score(p, r) for p, r in zip(prompts, rollouts)]
|
||||
advantages = compute_advantages(rewards)
|
||||
ppo_optimizer.step(policy, rollouts, advantages)
|
||||
# Loop closes: policy → output → reward → policy update
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Stability check (root locus)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import numpy as np
|
||||
from scipy.signal import TransferFunction, bode
|
||||
|
||||
# Open-loop transfer function
|
||||
sys = TransferFunction([1], [1, 2, 3, 1]) # 3rd order
|
||||
w, mag, phase = bode(sys)
|
||||
# Phase margin: phase at gain crossover + 180°
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Detect runaway positive feedback
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def detect_runaway(time_series: list[float], window: int = 10, threshold: float = 1.5) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Exponential growth detector — log-linear fit slope."""
|
||||
import numpy as np
|
||||
if len(time_series) < window:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
y = np.log(np.maximum(time_series[-window:], 1e-9))
|
||||
slope = np.polyfit(range(window), y, 1)[0]
|
||||
return slope > np.log(threshold) / window
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 결정 기준
|
||||
| 상황 | Approach |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Process regulation, setpoint tracking | PID (negative feedback) |
|
||||
| Growth modeling | logistic / Gompertz (mixed) |
|
||||
| Cascading failure prevention | rate limiters + circuit breakers |
|
||||
| Slow process w/ delay | feed-forward + smith predictor |
|
||||
| ML training | RLHF / GRPO with KL regularization |
|
||||
|
||||
**기본값**: 매 negative feedback 의 default for stability. 매 positive feedback 의 explicit guard (rate limit, kill switch).
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Graph
|
||||
- 부모: [[Cybernetics Foundations|Cybernetics]] · [[Control Theory]] · [[Systems_Thinking|Systems Thinking]]
|
||||
- 응용: [[RLHF]] · [[Homeostasis (항상성)|Homeostasis]]
|
||||
|
||||
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
||||
**언제**: 매 archetype identification, 매 PID gain initial estimation, 매 system dynamics diagram 의 stock-flow conversion.
|
||||
**언제 X**: 매 safety-critical control gain tuning — 매 hardware-in-the-loop testing, 매 actual phase margin verification 필수.
|
||||
|
||||
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
||||
- **Ignoring delay**: 매 time-delay 의 PID 의 instability — 매 dead-time compensation 필요.
|
||||
- **High gain assumption = better tracking**: 매 oscillation, 매 noise amplification.
|
||||
- **Open-loop control for safety-critical**: 매 disturbance rejection X — 매 closed-loop 필수.
|
||||
- **Reinforcing loop 의 무방어 deploy**: 매 viral metric 의 optimization — 매 social harm runaway (engagement maximization → polarization).
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
||||
- Verified (Wiener "Cybernetics" 1948, Åström & Murray "Feedback Systems" 2nd ed, Sterman "Business Dynamics" 2000, Senge "Fifth Discipline" rev. ed).
|
||||
- 신뢰도 A.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🕓 Changelog
|
||||
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
||||
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — PID, Senge archetypes, RLHF/autoscaling 추가 |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user