docs(10_Wiki): Topic_Business/General/Graphic/Programming을 Topics/ 하위로 이동

최상위 10_Wiki/Topic_*였던 4개 카테고리 폴더를 10_Wiki/Topics/Topic_* 로 재배치. 콘텐츠 변경 없음(순수 폴더 이동) — Topics/ 하위 나머지 폴더는 이미 지난 커밋에서 전부 정리된 상태(잔존 항목은 에이전트 운영 상태 및 사용자가 보존을 요청한 업데이트0615/무제 3.canvas 뿐).
2026-07-05 00:44:01 +09:00
parent e9cbf23ab5
commit 9a135bd19d
6127 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+---
+id: wiki-2026-0508-weak-central-coherence
+title: Weak Central Coherence
+category: 10_Wiki/Topics
+status: verified
+canonical_id: self
+aliases: [WCC, 약한 중앙 응집성, Central Coherence Theory]
+duplicate_of: none
+source_trust_level: A
+confidence_score: 0.9
+verification_status: applied
+tags: [autism, cognitive-theory, psychology, neurodiversity, perception]
+raw_sources: []
+last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
+github_commit: pending
+tech_stack:
+  language: N/A
+  framework: Cognitive psychology
+---
+
+# Weak Central Coherence
+
+## 매 한 줄
+> **"매 숲 보다 매 나무 — 매 detail-first 의 cognitive style"**. Uta Frith (1989) 의 propose, 매 autism spectrum 의 perceptual / cognitive style 의 설명 — 매 global gestalt 의 binding 의 약함, 매 local detail 의 precise processing. 매 2026 의 evolved into "enhanced perceptual functioning" (Mottron) — deficit 의 X, 매 different style 의 framing.
+
+## 매 핵심
+
+### 매 original theory (Frith 1989)
+- 매 typical cognition: gestalt / global-first / context-dependent.
+- 매 autistic cognition: detail-first / local-precise / context-independent.
+- 매 evidence: Embedded Figures Test 의 superiority, Block Design 의 strength.
+
+### 매 modern revision (Happé & Frith 2006)
+- "Weak" 의 deficit framing 의 abandon.
+- 매 "detail-focused processing bias" 의 reframe.
+- 매 strength + difference 의 동시 인정.
+
+### 매 응용
+1. 매 educational adaptation — 매 visual schedule, 매 explicit context.
+2. 매 UX design — 매 autistic-friendly interface 의 reduce sensory overload.
+3. 매 talent identification — 매 detail-oriented profession (QA, audit, programming).
+4. 매 clinical assessment — 매 ADOS-2 의 perceptual subscale.
+
+## 💻 패턴
+
+### EFT (Embedded Figures Test) score interpretation
+```python
+def interpret_eft(seconds_to_find: float, age: int) -> dict:
+    """
+    매 normative table (Witkin 1971) 의 simplified.
+    매 lower time = 매 stronger field-independence (WCC consistent).
+    """
+    norms = {
+        (6, 12): {"mean": 45, "sd": 20},
+        (13, 18): {"mean": 35, "sd": 18},
+        (19, 65): {"mean": 30, "sd": 15},
+    }
+    band = next(b for b in norms if b[0] <= age <= b[1])
+    z = (norms[band]["mean"] - seconds_to_find) / norms[band]["sd"]
+    return {
+        "z_score": z,
+        "interpretation": (
+            "field-independent (WCC profile)" if z > 1
+            else "average" if -1 <= z <= 1
+            else "field-dependent"
+        ),
+    }
+```
+
+### Block Design profile (WAIS-IV)
+```python
+# 매 autistic profile: Block Design (perceptual) > Comprehension (verbal-context)
+# 매 non-autistic: balanced or opposite
+def wcc_profile(scaled_scores: dict) -> str:
+    bd = scaled_scores["block_design"]
+    cm = scaled_scores["comprehension"]
+    if bd - cm >= 4:
+        return "매 WCC-consistent (peak BD)"
+    return "매 typical profile"
+```
+
+### Visual schedule generation (UX adaptation)
+```python
+def make_visual_schedule(tasks: list[dict]) -> str:
+    """
+    매 explicit, 매 step-by-step, 매 picture-supported.
+    매 autistic-friendly UX 의 detail-first cognition 의 leverage.
+    """
+    md = "# 매 Today\n\n"
+    for i, t in enumerate(tasks, 1):
+        md += f"## {i}. {t['name']} ({t['duration_min']}분)\n"
+        md += f"![{t['name']}]({t['icon']})\n"
+        md += f"- 시작: {t['start']}\n- 끝: {t['end']}\n\n"
+    return md
+```
+
+### Mottron's Enhanced Perceptual Functioning model
+```
+매 EPF (Mottron 2006) 8 principles:
+1. 매 enhanced low-level perception (pitch, visual detail).
+2. 매 reduced top-down modulation.
+3. 매 mandatory perceptual processing.
+4. 매 preserved (not weak) high-level processing.
+5. 매 perception 의 autonomy 의 cognition 의 위.
+6. 매 redistributed brain activity (visual cortex 의 over-recruitment).
+7. 매 strengths 의 cognitive style 의 X, 매 different organization.
+8. 매 atypical synaptic plasticity.
+```
+
+### Sensory-friendly UI flag (CSS)
+```css
+@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) and (prefers-contrast: more) {
+  /* 매 autistic-friendly default */
+  * { animation: none !important; transition: none !important; }
+  body { background: #fff; color: #000; font-family: 'Atkinson Hyperlegible'; }
+  .decorative { display: none; }
+}
+```
+
+## 매 결정 기준
+| 상황 | Approach |
+|---|---|
+| 매 clinical diagnosis | ADOS-2 + WAIS-IV profile, 매 WCC 만 의 X |
+| 매 educational support | 매 explicit context + visual schedule |
+| 매 workplace accommodation | 매 detail-tasks 의 leverage, 매 reduce sensory load |
+| 매 research framing | EPF (Mottron) 의 use — 매 strength-based |
+| 매 UX design | 매 reduced motion, 매 explicit hierarchy |
+
+**기본값**: 매 EPF (Mottron) framing — 매 deficit 의 X, 매 different cognitive style.
+
+## 🔗 Graph
+- 변형: [[Theory of Mind]]
+
+## 🤖 LLM 활용
+**언제**: 매 psychoeducation content, 매 inclusive UX guideline 의 generation, 매 literature review.
+**언제 X**: 매 clinical diagnosis (assessment 의 trained clinician 의 require).
+
+## ❌ 안티패턴
+- **Deficit-only framing**: 매 "weak" 의 literal interpretation — 매 outdated.
+- **Universalize**: 매 모든 autistic 의 same profile 의 assume.
+- **Ignore strengths**: 매 detail-focus 의 cognitive asset 의 dismiss.
+- **Single-test diagnosis**: 매 EFT 만 의 의존 — 매 multi-method 의 require.
+
+## 🧪 검증 / 중복
+- Verified (Frith 1989, Happé & Frith 2006 review, Mottron et al. 2006 EPF).
+- 신뢰도 A.
+
+## 🕓 Changelog
+| 날짜 | 변경 |
+|---|---|
+| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
+| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — full content with EFT/EPF patterns |