docs(10_Wiki): Topic_Business/General/Graphic/Programming을 Topics/ 하위로 이동
최상위 10_Wiki/Topic_*였던 4개 카테고리 폴더를 10_Wiki/Topics/Topic_* 로 재배치. 콘텐츠 변경 없음(순수 폴더 이동) — Topics/ 하위 나머지 폴더는 이미 지난 커밋에서 전부 정리된 상태(잔존 항목은 에이전트 운영 상태 및 사용자가 보존을 요청한 업데이트0615/무제 3.canvas 뿐).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: wiki-2026-0508-etiology-of-disease
|
||||
title: Etiology of Disease
|
||||
category: 10_Wiki/Topics
|
||||
status: verified
|
||||
canonical_id: self
|
||||
aliases: [Disease Causation, Pathogenesis, Causal Inference (Medicine)]
|
||||
duplicate_of: none
|
||||
source_trust_level: A
|
||||
confidence_score: 0.9
|
||||
verification_status: applied
|
||||
tags: [medicine, epidemiology, causal-inference, pathology]
|
||||
raw_sources: []
|
||||
last_reinforced: 2026-05-10
|
||||
github_commit: pending
|
||||
tech_stack:
|
||||
language: r
|
||||
framework: epidemiology
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Etiology of Disease
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 한 줄
|
||||
> **"매 disease 의 cause = single agent 가 아닌 web of necessary + sufficient + component causes"**. 매 1840 Henle-Koch 의 single-pathogen postulate → 매 Rothman 1976 sufficient-component model → 매 2026 의 multi-omics + Mendelian randomization + DAG-based causal inference.
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 핵심
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 causation models
|
||||
- **Henle-Koch postulates**: 매 isolation, transmission, re-isolation — 매 monocausal infectious era.
|
||||
- **Bradford Hill criteria (1965)**: 9 viewpoints — strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, biological gradient, plausibility, coherence, experiment, analogy.
|
||||
- **Rothman sufficient-component**: 매 disease = sum of "pies", each pie = sufficient cause = set of component causes. 매 same disease 의 multiple sufficient sets.
|
||||
- **Counterfactual / DAG**: 매 Pearl 의 do-calculus, 매 confounder identification.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 causal categories
|
||||
- **Necessary**: 매 cause 없이 disease 없음 (예: HIV → AIDS).
|
||||
- **Sufficient**: 매 cause 만 으로 disease (rare in practice).
|
||||
- **Component**: 매 sufficient cause 의 part (예: 흡연 + asbestos + genetic).
|
||||
- **Risk factor**: 매 association 만 — causality 의 unconfirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
### 매 응용
|
||||
1. Smoking → lung cancer (Doll & Hill 1950).
|
||||
2. H. pylori → peptic ulcer (Marshall 1984).
|
||||
3. HPV → cervical cancer (zur Hausen 2008 Nobel).
|
||||
4. APOE4 → Alzheimer (genetic risk, not deterministic).
|
||||
|
||||
## 💻 패턴
|
||||
|
||||
### Bradford Hill scoring
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class HillCriteria:
|
||||
strength: float # RR or OR
|
||||
consistency: int # # of confirming studies
|
||||
temporality: bool # exposure precedes outcome
|
||||
gradient: bool # dose-response
|
||||
plausibility: bool # mechanism known
|
||||
coherence: bool # fits prior knowledge
|
||||
experiment: bool # RCT / natural experiment
|
||||
specificity: bool
|
||||
|
||||
def hill_score(c: HillCriteria) -> int:
|
||||
score = 0
|
||||
score += 2 if c.strength >= 3 else 1 if c.strength >= 2 else 0
|
||||
score += min(c.consistency // 3, 3)
|
||||
score += [c.temporality, c.gradient, c.plausibility,
|
||||
c.coherence, c.experiment, c.specificity].count(True)
|
||||
return score # ≥7 = strong causal evidence
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Confounder adjustment via DAG (DoWhy)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import dowhy
|
||||
from dowhy import CausalModel
|
||||
|
||||
model = CausalModel(
|
||||
data=df,
|
||||
treatment="smoking",
|
||||
outcome="lung_cancer",
|
||||
common_causes=["age", "sex", "ses"],
|
||||
instruments=["tobacco_tax"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
identified = model.identify_effect()
|
||||
estimate = model.estimate_effect(identified, method_name="backdoor.linear_regression")
|
||||
refute = model.refute_estimate(identified, estimate, method_name="placebo_treatment_refuter")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Mendelian randomization
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Instrumental variable: SNP → exposure → outcome
|
||||
# (SNP independent of confounders)
|
||||
import statsmodels.api as sm
|
||||
|
||||
# Wald ratio: beta_outcome / beta_exposure
|
||||
def mendelian_ratio(snp_exposure_beta: float, snp_outcome_beta: float) -> float:
|
||||
return snp_outcome_beta / snp_exposure_beta
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Population attributable fraction
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def paf(prevalence: float, relative_risk: float) -> float:
|
||||
"""Fraction of disease attributable to exposure in population."""
|
||||
return prevalence * (relative_risk - 1) / (1 + prevalence * (relative_risk - 1))
|
||||
|
||||
# Smoking prevalence 25%, RR for lung cancer 20:
|
||||
print(paf(0.25, 20)) # ~0.83 → 83% of lung cancer attributable to smoking
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Sufficient-component pie visualization
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def sufficient_pies(disease: str) -> list[set[str]]:
|
||||
"""Each pie = a set of component causes that together suffice."""
|
||||
return [
|
||||
{"smoking", "genetic_susceptibility"}, # pie 1
|
||||
{"asbestos", "smoking"}, # pie 2
|
||||
{"radon", "smoking", "vitamin_deficiency"}, # pie 3
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 매 결정 기준
|
||||
| 상황 | Method |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Single pathogen, acute | Koch postulates (modernized) |
|
||||
| Chronic, multifactorial | Bradford Hill + Rothman |
|
||||
| Observational with confounders | DAG + backdoor adjustment |
|
||||
| Genetic causation suspected | Mendelian randomization |
|
||||
| RCT impossible (ethics) | quasi-experiment + sensitivity analysis |
|
||||
|
||||
**기본값**: 매 Bradford Hill + DAG-based confounder adjustment + sensitivity analysis (E-value).
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Graph
|
||||
- 부모: [[Causal Inference]]
|
||||
|
||||
## 🤖 LLM 활용
|
||||
**언제**: 매 literature synthesis 의 mechanism aggregation, 매 DAG 의 candidate confounder enumeration, 매 sufficient-component 의 component proposal.
|
||||
**언제 X**: 매 final causation claim 의 LLM 의 의존 — 매 effect estimate 의 source data + statistical method 의 검증 필수.
|
||||
|
||||
## ❌ 안티패턴
|
||||
- **Single-cause thinking**: 매 multifactorial disease 의 monocausal explanation — 매 H. pylori 발견 전 의 stress 의 ulcer 의 단일 cause 의 오해.
|
||||
- **Correlation = causation**: 매 RR 만 으로 causal claim — 매 confounding, reverse causation, selection bias 의 무시.
|
||||
- **Ignoring temporality**: 매 cross-sectional study 의 causal direction 의 결정 X.
|
||||
- **Hill criteria 의 checklist 화**: 매 의 mechanical scoring — 매 viewpoints, not rules (Hill 의 의도).
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 검증 / 중복
|
||||
- Verified (Rothman & Greenland "Modern Epidemiology" 4th ed, Hernán & Robins "Causal Inference: What If" 2024, Pearl "Causality" 2nd ed).
|
||||
- 신뢰도 A.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🕓 Changelog
|
||||
| 날짜 | 변경 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| 2026-05-08 | Phase 1 |
|
||||
| 2026-05-10 | Manual cleanup — Hill criteria, Rothman pies, DAG/MR patterns 추가 |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user